Figure 4
Figure 4. Quantification of the number of rolling platelets over VWF and FKN coimmobilized with VWF. Washed platelets were preincubated with modulators as described in Figure 3 and perfused over VWF and FKN coimmobilized with VWF. The number of rolling platelets was quantified after removing firmly adherent platelets by image processing. (A-B) Perfusion at a wall shear rate of 150 s−1 (A) and 600 s−1 (B). Shown is the percentage of platelets rolling on FKN coimmobilized with VWF, and the number of platelets rolling on VWF alone (C-D) was set to 100% for each treatment (dotted line). *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001 in one sample t test versus 100%, which represents the number of platelets rolling on VWF only surfaces. (C-D) The absolute number of platelets rolling on VWF-coated surface at the wall shear rate of 150 s−1 (C) and 600 s−1 (D). The results are the mean ± SEM of at least 4 independent experiments with blood from different donors.

Quantification of the number of rolling platelets over VWF and FKN coimmobilized with VWF. Washed platelets were preincubated with modulators as described in Figure 3 and perfused over VWF and FKN coimmobilized with VWF. The number of rolling platelets was quantified after removing firmly adherent platelets by image processing. (A-B) Perfusion at a wall shear rate of 150 s−1 (A) and 600 s−1 (B). Shown is the percentage of platelets rolling on FKN coimmobilized with VWF, and the number of platelets rolling on VWF alone (C-D) was set to 100% for each treatment (dotted line). *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001 in one sample t test versus 100%, which represents the number of platelets rolling on VWF only surfaces. (C-D) The absolute number of platelets rolling on VWF-coated surface at the wall shear rate of 150 s−1 (C) and 600 s−1 (D). The results are the mean ± SEM of at least 4 independent experiments with blood from different donors.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal