Figure 4.
FFP graphed for GHSG ESF, ESU low MTVt and high MTVt, and IIB-advanced and GHSG ESF, ESU low TLGt and high TLGt, and IIB-advanced. (A) FFP between ESU low MTVt and high MTVt (P < .02) as well as low TLGt and high TLGt (P < .002) differs significantly, whereas there is no difference between ESF and ESU low MTVt (P = .3) or ESU high MTVt and IIB-advanced (P = .8). (B) There is also no difference between ESF or ESU low TLGt (P = .4) and ESU high TLGt and IIB-advanced (P = 1).