Figure 2
Figure 2. Cumulative incidence of posttransplant leukemia relapses. (A,C) Relapses in historical controls, and (B,D) in the present cohort of Treg-Tcon patients. Relapse rates were evaluated separately for transplants from NK alloreactive (solid line) vs non–NK-alloreactive (dotted line) donors. In historical AML patients, the cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly lower for those who were transplanted from NK-alloreactive donors (0.32 vs 0.03; P = .03), whereas no difference was observed in historical ALL patients (0.31 and 0.29, respectively). In Treg-Tcon haplo transplants leukemia relapse was markedly reduced in all patients independently of NK alloreactivity (B,D).

Cumulative incidence of posttransplant leukemia relapses. (A,C) Relapses in historical controls, and (B,D) in the present cohort of Treg-Tcon patients. Relapse rates were evaluated separately for transplants from NK alloreactive (solid line) vs non–NK-alloreactive (dotted line) donors. In historical AML patients, the cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly lower for those who were transplanted from NK-alloreactive donors (0.32 vs 0.03; P = .03), whereas no difference was observed in historical ALL patients (0.31 and 0.29, respectively). In Treg-Tcon haplo transplants leukemia relapse was markedly reduced in all patients independently of NK alloreactivity (B,D).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal