Figure 4
Figure 4. Bone marrow progenitor cell-intrinsic role of IRF8 in basophil and mast cell development. (A) Bone marrow transplantation experiments. Irradiated WT recipients reconstituted with WT bone marrow cells (WT→WT), irradiated Irf8−/− recipients reconstituted with WT bone marrow cells (WT→Irf8−/−), and irradiated WT recipients reconstituted with Irf8−/− bone marrow cells (Irf8−/−→WT) for 5 weeks were analyzed as in Figure 1A. Values in the bar graph are means ± standard deviations from 4 mice. Similar results were obtained in 3 other independent experiments. (B,D) fluorescence-activated cell sorter–purified Flt3– GPs (B) and splenic BMCPs (D) from WT and Irf8−/− mice were cultured in the presence of IL-3 for 5 or 7 days, respectively, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with similar results, and values in the bar graphs are means ± standard deviations from triplicate samples. (C,E) GP transfer experiments were performed to analyze the generation of basophils (C) and mast cells (E). For basophils (C), 10 000 Flt3− GPs from WT or Irf8−/− mice (CD45.2+) were transplanted into irradiated Ly5.1 mice (CD45.2−). Donor-derived (CD45.2+) splenic basophils were analyzed on day 4. Numbers in parentheses indicate the percentages relative to total cell counts. For mast cells (E), 20 000 Flt3− GPs (CD45.2+) with 3 × 105 Ly5.1 bone marrow cells (CD45.2−) were transplanted into irradiated mast cell-deficient KitW-sh/W-sh mice. CD45.2+ mast cells in the peritoneal cavity were analyzed 5 weeks after transplantation. Values in the bar graph are the mean ± standard deviation of 2 independent experiments with a total of 4 mice per group. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001 (Student t test). NS, not significant.

Bone marrow progenitor cell-intrinsic role of IRF8 in basophil and mast cell development. (A) Bone marrow transplantation experiments. Irradiated WT recipients reconstituted with WT bone marrow cells (WT→WT), irradiated Irf8−/− recipients reconstituted with WT bone marrow cells (WT→Irf8−/−), and irradiated WT recipients reconstituted with Irf8−/− bone marrow cells (Irf8−/−→WT) for 5 weeks were analyzed as in Figure 1A. Values in the bar graph are means ± standard deviations from 4 mice. Similar results were obtained in 3 other independent experiments. (B,D) fluorescence-activated cell sorter–purified Flt3 GPs (B) and splenic BMCPs (D) from WT and Irf8−/− mice were cultured in the presence of IL-3 for 5 or 7 days, respectively, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with similar results, and values in the bar graphs are means ± standard deviations from triplicate samples. (C,E) GP transfer experiments were performed to analyze the generation of basophils (C) and mast cells (E). For basophils (C), 10 000 Flt3 GPs from WT or Irf8−/− mice (CD45.2+) were transplanted into irradiated Ly5.1 mice (CD45.2). Donor-derived (CD45.2+) splenic basophils were analyzed on day 4. Numbers in parentheses indicate the percentages relative to total cell counts. For mast cells (E), 20 000 Flt3 GPs (CD45.2+) with 3 × 105 Ly5.1 bone marrow cells (CD45.2) were transplanted into irradiated mast cell-deficient KitW-sh/W-sh mice. CD45.2+ mast cells in the peritoneal cavity were analyzed 5 weeks after transplantation. Values in the bar graph are the mean ± standard deviation of 2 independent experiments with a total of 4 mice per group. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001 (Student t test). NS, not significant.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal