Figure 1.
Figure 1. HR point estimates and risk ratio point estimates corresponding to ORs in previous studies consistently fall outside the 95% CIs of HR estimates in the current study. Adjusted HR point estimates (♢) and 95% CIs (―) from the FHCRC cohort are shown together with HR point estimates (♦) or risk ratio estimates corresponding to ORs (●) in previous studies. Results for rs1800871d and rs1800871r, respectively, represent dominant and recessive genetic models.

HR point estimates and risk ratio point estimates corresponding to ORs in previous studies consistently fall outside the 95% CIs of HR estimates in the current study. Adjusted HR point estimates (♢) and 95% CIs (―) from the FHCRC cohort are shown together with HR point estimates (♦) or risk ratio estimates corresponding to ORs (●) in previous studies. Results for rs1800871d and rs1800871r, respectively, represent dominant and recessive genetic models.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal