Figure 6.
Figure 6. Relationship between INR category and percentage of days with bleeding outcomes. (A) Unadjusted percentages of patient-days (95% CIs) with grade ≥2A bleeding. (B) ORs (95% CIs) for grade ≥2A bleeding compared with the reference category of INR ≤1.2, taking into account within-person correlation. The 2 df test for any association between INR category and grade ≥2A bleeding had P < .001. (C) Unadjusted percentages of patient-days (95% CIs) with grade ≥3 bleeding. (D) ORs (95% CIs) for grade ≥3 bleeding compared with the reference category of INR ≤1.2, taking into account within-person correlation. The 2 df test for any association between INR category and grade ≥3 bleeding had P = .04.

Relationship between INR category and percentage of days with bleeding outcomes. (A) Unadjusted percentages of patient-days (95% CIs) with grade ≥2A bleeding. (B) ORs (95% CIs) for grade ≥2A bleeding compared with the reference category of INR ≤1.2, taking into account within-person correlation. The 2 df test for any association between INR category and grade ≥2A bleeding had P < .001. (C) Unadjusted percentages of patient-days (95% CIs) with grade ≥3 bleeding. (D) ORs (95% CIs) for grade ≥3 bleeding compared with the reference category of INR ≤1.2, taking into account within-person correlation. The 2 df test for any association between INR category and grade ≥3 bleeding had P = .04.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal