Figure 4.
Figure 4. Immune reconstitution by conditioning regimen. (A) Patients who received conditioning (RIC or MAC) attained higher levels of T-cell chimerism at all time points measured (P ≤ .001 at 100 days, P < .001 at 180 days, and P < .001 at 365 days, respectively). (B) Patients who received conditioning (RIC or MAC) attained higher levels of B-cell chimerism at all time points measured (P ≤ .001 at 100 days, P < .001 at 180 days, P < .001 at 365 days, respectively). (C) Patients who received conditioning (RIC or MAC) attained higher levels of myeloid cell chimerism at all time points measured (P ≤ .001 at 100 days, P < .001 at 180 days, P < .001 at 365 days, respectively). (D) At 1 year post-HCT, conditioned vs nonconditioned patients had higher median CD4 cell counts (1352 cells/μL vs 855 cells/μL; P = .02).

Immune reconstitution by conditioning regimen. (A) Patients who received conditioning (RIC or MAC) attained higher levels of T-cell chimerism at all time points measured (P ≤ .001 at 100 days, P < .001 at 180 days, and P < .001 at 365 days, respectively). (B) Patients who received conditioning (RIC or MAC) attained higher levels of B-cell chimerism at all time points measured (P ≤ .001 at 100 days, P < .001 at 180 days, P < .001 at 365 days, respectively). (C) Patients who received conditioning (RIC or MAC) attained higher levels of myeloid cell chimerism at all time points measured (P ≤ .001 at 100 days, P < .001 at 180 days, P < .001 at 365 days, respectively). (D) At 1 year post-HCT, conditioned vs nonconditioned patients had higher median CD4 cell counts (1352 cells/μL vs 855 cells/μL; P = .02).

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal