CCR7−/− mice have increased numbers of HSCs and GMPs compared with WT controls. (A) CCR7 gene expression from FACS-sorted WT CMPs and GMPs were analyzed by real-time PCR (values represent CCR7 amplification cycle, compared with GAPDH). (B-E) Markers for HSCs were lineage−, c-Kit+, Sca-1+, and CD34−. CMPs were lineage−, c-Kit+, Sca-1−, CD34+, and CD16/32 low. GMPs were identical to CMPs, but were CD16/32 high. (B) HSC, CMP, and GMP numbers and percentages from BM of naïve WT and CCR7−/− mice. (C) Flow cytometric plots of lineage− BM from naïve WT and CCR7−/− mice. C-Kit+, Sca-1+, and lineage− cells (left graphs) were analyzed for the expression of CD34 (right graphs). (D) Flow cytometric plots of total MPCs show similar percentages between WT and CCR7−/− mice, but differences in the percentages of CMPs and GMPs. (E) HSC, CMP, and GMP numbers and percentages from the spleens of naïve WT and CCR7−/− mice (n = 3-5 mice per group, representative of more than 5 experiments). *P < .05, when comparing WT and CCR7−/− HSCs and MCPs.