Figure 1.
Figure 1. OS by POD24 and by MZL subtypes. OS from a risk-defining event after diagnosis in patients with MZL who were immediately treated after diagnosis. (A) Patients with MZL: POD24 rate, 18%; 3-year OS POD24, achieve 95% vs fail 53% (P < .001) (HR, 19.5; 95% CI, 8.40-45.4). (B) Patients with SMZL: POD rate, 25%; 3-year OS POD24, achieve 95% vs fail 44% (P < .001). (C) Patients with disseminated MZL (Diss-MZL): POD rate, 20%: 3-year OS POD24, achieve 93% vs fail 33% (P < .001). (D) Patients with ENMZL: POD rate, 16%; 3-year OS POD24, achieve 98% vs fail 71% (P < .001). Association of POD24 with OS could not be assessed for NMZL patients because too few events have been reported in this subgroup to do any inference.

OS by POD24 and by MZL subtypes. OS from a risk-defining event after diagnosis in patients with MZL who were immediately treated after diagnosis. (A) Patients with MZL: POD24 rate, 18%; 3-year OS POD24, achieve 95% vs fail 53% (P < .001) (HR, 19.5; 95% CI, 8.40-45.4). (B) Patients with SMZL: POD rate, 25%; 3-year OS POD24, achieve 95% vs fail 44% (P < .001). (C) Patients with disseminated MZL (Diss-MZL): POD rate, 20%: 3-year OS POD24, achieve 93% vs fail 33% (P < .001). (D) Patients with ENMZL: POD rate, 16%; 3-year OS POD24, achieve 98% vs fail 71% (P < .001). Association of POD24 with OS could not be assessed for NMZL patients because too few events have been reported in this subgroup to do any inference.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal