Figure 3.
Figure 3. Expression of cell surface molecules. (A) The pE T-cell subset shares cell surface molecules with effector T lymphocytes. Purified CD8 T cells were stained with CD8, CCR7, CD45RA, CD27 mAbs and other mAbs as indicated. Histograms show the proportion of positive cells among RA+CCR7+27+ (N), RA+CCR7–27+ (pE), and RA+CCR7–27– (E) gated subsets. These results were consistent in 8 healthy individuals. Note that our experimental procedure (see “Materials and methods” for details) to analyze N, pE, and E CD8 T subpopulations allows the exclusion of any residual contaminating NK cells as shown by anti-CD3 costaining. (B) Analysis of CD28 expression on N, pE, and E CD8+ T-cell subsets. Naive and effector T cells displayed, respectively, RA+CCR7+27+28+ and RA+CCR7–27–28– phenotypes. In contrast, the pE CD8 subset contained CD28+ as well as CD28– cells. Accordingly, pE T cells are split into pE1 (RA+CCR7–27+28+) and pE2 (RA+CCR7–27+28–) subsets.

Expression of cell surface molecules. (A) The pE T-cell subset shares cell surface molecules with effector T lymphocytes. Purified CD8 T cells were stained with CD8, CCR7, CD45RA, CD27 mAbs and other mAbs as indicated. Histograms show the proportion of positive cells among RA+CCR7+27+ (N), RA+CCR727+ (pE), and RA+CCR727 (E) gated subsets. These results were consistent in 8 healthy individuals. Note that our experimental procedure (see “Materials and methods” for details) to analyze N, pE, and E CD8 T subpopulations allows the exclusion of any residual contaminating NK cells as shown by anti-CD3 costaining. (B) Analysis of CD28 expression on N, pE, and E CD8+ T-cell subsets. Naive and effector T cells displayed, respectively, RA+CCR7+27+28+ and RA+CCR72728 phenotypes. In contrast, the pE CD8 subset contained CD28+ as well as CD28 cells. Accordingly, pE T cells are split into pE1 (RA+CCR727+28+) and pE2 (RA+CCR727+28) subsets.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal