Figure 4.
Correlations among CTCF occupancy, DNA methylation, and gene expression. (A) PCA analysis of DMCs (left), DEGs (middle), and DBCs (right) based on analyses from EPIC DNA methylation array, RNA-seq, and ChIP-seq for CTCF, respectively. (B) Multiple coinertia analysis of DMCs, DBCs, and DEGs based on EPIC DNA methylation, RNA-seq, and ChIP-seq data, where data from all 3 analyses performed in the same samples were integrated. Each patient is represented by filled circles for DNA methylation data, triangles for ChIP-seq data, and filled squares for gene expression data, while the length of the line that connects the 3 omics types is proportional to the divergence of the data in the same sample. (C) Dot plot of DBCs (AMLall vs NBM) in relation to the change in expression of the related genes comparing AMLall and NBM. The x-axis represents fold change of gene expression, and the y-axis fold change in CTCF occupancy (FDR <0.05). Black dots indicate genes with statistically significant change expression (FDR <0.05, fold change >1.5). χ2 test was used to calculate statistical significance between Q1 and Q2 (P < .001). (D) Bar plot showing the genomic distribution of DBCs with differentially expressed gene in panel C. (E) Dot plot of DBCs in relation to fold change of β-values (Δβ-value) for AMLall vs NBM, where the x-axis represents fold change in β-value and the y-axis fold change in CTCF occupancy. Statistical significance is indicated by dashed blue lines for Δβ-value (FDR <0.05, fold change >1.5). Green and red diamonds represent up- or downregulated genes, respectively, while yellow diamonds represent genes with no change in gene expression. χ2 test used to calculate statistical significance in gene expression between Q1 and Q4 (P < .001). PC, principal component.