TO THE EDITOR:

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a multimeric plasma glycoprotein necessary for normal vertebrate hemostasis. It is a linear homopolymer consisting of a variable number of concatenated ∼280 kDa subunits.1 The conformation of VWF multimers has been controversial. The spectrum of macromolecular conformations ranges from a globular particle to a random coil to a rod-like particle2 (p. 261). Based on electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, small-angle neutron scattering, total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, and theoretical studies, the conformation of multimeric VWF under static conditions has been variably described as a “ball-of-yarn,”3 a “tangled coil,”4 a “compact, bird’s nest,”1 a “compact fuzz ball,”5 “compact and globular,”6 and a “dense globule.”7 These descriptions suggest that the conformation of VWF is a function of strong attractive forces between subunits.8 However, recently the characterization of VWF at pH 7.4 by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation, dynamic light scattering (DLS), and multiangle light scattering (MALS) have challenged this notion.9,10 Conformation plots of the sedimentation coefficient, diffusion coefficient, and radius of gyration as a function of molecular weight were consistent with a random coil conformation and not a folded, globular conformation.

The characterization of the conformation of VWF at pH 6.2 of the trans-Golgi where multimerization occurs is an additional physiologically relevant problem. In the present study, we fractionated VWF/fVIII complexes by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) at either pH 6.2 or pH 7.4 across a molecular weight range of ∼2 to 6 MDa and measured the ratio of the radius of gyration to the hydrodynamic radius. Our results are consistent with a random coil conformation at both pH 6.2 and pH 7.4.

VWF/fVIII complexes in Alphanate (antihemophilic factor/VWF complex [human], Grifols USA), a commercial product used in the treatment of von Willebrand disease and hemophilia A,11,12 were fractionated by SEC at pH 6.2 and pH 7.4, studied by MALS to obtain estimates of molecular weight and radius of gyration, and by DLS to obtain estimates of the diffusion coefficient and hydrodynamic radius. Material from 2 vials of Alphanate were dissolved by adding 10 mL of sterile water for injection to each vial. The sample was applied to a 2.5 × 120 cm Sephacryl S-1000 SEC column equilibrated in 0.15 M sodium chloride, 0.02 M N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 5 mM calcium chloride (HEPES-buffered saline [HBS]/calcium [Ca] buffer) at pH 6.2 or pH 7.4 at room temperature at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. VWF/fVIII complexes emerged as a single peak and contained at least 95% VWF as judged by reduced sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Fractions containing VWF/fVIII complexes were diluted to 0.15 mg/mL in HBS/Ca buffer and frozen in 0.45-mL aliquots at −80 °C.

SEC MALS was performed on SEC-fractionated VWF/fVIII complexes using a DAWN MALS detector and Optilab differential refractometer (Wyatt Corporation) in line with a 1260 Infinity II high performance liquid chromatography system (Agilent Corporation) and a Superdex 200 10/300 GL SEC column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) in HBS/Ca at pH 6.2 or pH 7.4, as described previously.10 Data acquisition and analysis were performed using ASTRA version 8.1.1.12 (Wyatt Corporation). VWF/fVIII complexes eluted as a single peak near the void volume. Estimates of the weight-average molecular weight (Mw) and the z-average radius of gyration (Rgz) of the VWF/fVIII peak were made using the Berry model.13,14 

The equivalent radius corresponding to the radius of gyration was calculated using15 
DLS measurements were made using a Zetasizer Nano S system (Malvern Pananalytical) at a scattering angle of 175°, as described previously.9,10 The z-average diffusion coefficient, referenced to water as the standard solvent at 20°C [(Dz)20w] was obtained using the cumulant analysis model16,17 in SEDFIT version 16.36 (https://sedfitsedphat.nibib.nih.gov/). The hydrodynamic radius (Rh), which is synonymous with the equivalent radius for translation diffusion (aT),15 was calculated using the Stokes-Einstein equation,18,
in which R is the gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, η0 is the solvent viscosity, NA is Avogadro’s number, and D is the diffusion coefficient. Approximately 99% of the mass in a VWF/fVIII complex in Alphanate is attributable to VWF.9 Thus, measured parameters are almost entirely attributable to VWF. Figure 1 shows conformation plots14 of VWF at pH 6.2 and pH 7.4. The slopes of the regression lines yield estimates of the Mark-Houwink-Kuhn-Sakurada power law exponents αRg and αD.19 The estimates of αRg of 0.45 and 0.50 at pH 6.2 and pH 7.4, respectively, are close to the value of 0.50 expected for a random coil.20 In addition, the estimates of αD of −0.45 and −0.44 at pH 6.2 and pH 7.4, respectively, are close to the value of −0.50 expected for a random coil. These values are significantly different from the αRg and αD values of 0.67 and −0.33, respectively, for a globular particle.20 These results indicate that VWF is an unusual example of a native protein displaying random coil behavior in which the coil segments are folded domains of between ∼30 and 40 kDa.
Figure 1.

Conformation plots of SEC-fractionated VWF/fVIII complexes. VWF/fVIII complexes fractionated by Sephacryl S-1000 SEC at pH 6.2 or pH 7.4 were analyzed by SEC MALS to obtain estimates of the weight-average molecular weight and radius of gyration, and by DLS to obtain estimates of the z-average diffusion coefficient. The results are plotted as log10 ⟨Rgz vs log10 Mw (A) or log10 (Dz)20w vs log10 Mw (B). The units of Dz are Ficks (1 F = 10−7 cm2/s). Further shown are the fitted simple linear regression lines and Mark-Houwink-Kuhn-Sakurada exponents with standard errors obtained from the slopes of the regression lines calculated using Prism (version 9.3.0).

Figure 1.

Conformation plots of SEC-fractionated VWF/fVIII complexes. VWF/fVIII complexes fractionated by Sephacryl S-1000 SEC at pH 6.2 or pH 7.4 were analyzed by SEC MALS to obtain estimates of the weight-average molecular weight and radius of gyration, and by DLS to obtain estimates of the z-average diffusion coefficient. The results are plotted as log10 ⟨Rgz vs log10 Mw (A) or log10 (Dz)20w vs log10 Mw (B). The units of Dz are Ficks (1 F = 10−7 cm2/s). Further shown are the fitted simple linear regression lines and Mark-Houwink-Kuhn-Sakurada exponents with standard errors obtained from the slopes of the regression lines calculated using Prism (version 9.3.0).

Close modal

Additional information can be obtained from the ratios of equivalent radii associated with measurement of the diffusion coefficient and radius of gyration.20,21 An equivalent radius is the radius of a spherical particle having the same value of the solution property as that of the macromolecule under consideration. Figure 2A shows plots of the aG/aT ratio as a function of the molecular weight of VWF at pH 6.2 and pH 7.4. The values are independent of molecular weight, cluster around those expected for a random coil, and are distinctly higher than the value of 1 for a spherical (globular) molecule. The values at pH 6.2 are lower than those at pH 7.4. This difference is because of a decrease in the radius of gyration (Figure 1A), which is a measure of the distance of the mass elements of a macromolecule from its center of mass. These results are consistent with negative stain electron microscopy by Zhou et al showing self-association of VWF domains into dimeric “bouquets.”5 

Figure 2.

Ratios of equivalent radii(aG/aT) of SEC-fractionated VWF/fVIII complexes. (A) The equivalent radii, aG and aT, of VWF/fVIII fractionated at pH 6.2 or pH 7.4 by Sephacryl S-1000 SEC were calculated using the values of ⟨Rgz and (Dz)20w using equations 1 and 2. The dimensionless ratio (aG/aT) is plotted vs estimates of Mw obtained by MALS. The horizontal lines corresponding to aG/aT ratios for spheres and rods were calculated as described.20 The shaded region corresponds to the range of aG/aT ratios expected for a random coil, in which upper and lower limits represent the presence and absence of excluded volume, respectively.20 (B) Cartoon of a pearl string random coil polymer. The more localized distribution of mass for the conformations on the right corresponds to a decreased radius of gyration at pH 6.2.

Figure 2.

Ratios of equivalent radii(aG/aT) of SEC-fractionated VWF/fVIII complexes. (A) The equivalent radii, aG and aT, of VWF/fVIII fractionated at pH 6.2 or pH 7.4 by Sephacryl S-1000 SEC were calculated using the values of ⟨Rgz and (Dz)20w using equations 1 and 2. The dimensionless ratio (aG/aT) is plotted vs estimates of Mw obtained by MALS. The horizontal lines corresponding to aG/aT ratios for spheres and rods were calculated as described.20 The shaded region corresponds to the range of aG/aT ratios expected for a random coil, in which upper and lower limits represent the presence and absence of excluded volume, respectively.20 (B) Cartoon of a pearl string random coil polymer. The more localized distribution of mass for the conformations on the right corresponds to a decreased radius of gyration at pH 6.2.

Close modal

A crude representation of the solution conformation of VWF is depicted in Figure 2B using the classical pearl string model of random coil polymer22 (p. 602). Only 3 conformations from a vast number of available conformations are shown. The polymer contains 60 beads, which, at 30 kDa per bead, would correspond to a 1.8 MDa VWF multimer. The polymer at pH 6.2 is shown pervading less space than at pH 7.4, corresponding to a smaller radius of gyration.

Our finding that VWF displays random coil behavior at its biologically relevant pH values of 6.2 and 7.4 has important implications with respect to the biosynthesis and function of VWF. Pro-VWF dimers are transported from the endoplasmic reticulum to the trans-Golgi, where the VWF propeptide is cleaved and multimerization occurs.23 The propeptide/multimer complex remains noncovalently associated and aggregates into tubules that form nascent Weibel–Palade bodies. Exocytosis of Weibel–Palade bodies produces VWF “strings” that are extruded into plasma. The random coil conformation of VWF, in contrast to a compact, globular conformation, may be necessary for VWF to feed into a tubule and become extruded from a Weibel–Palade body. The smaller radius of gyration observed at pH 6.2 may facilitate assembly of the VWF random coil into Weibel–Palade bodies. It has been proposed that the activation of VWF in plasma at pH 7.4 by shear stress under flow includes unraveling a compact, globular VWF conformation.1,8 A random coil conformation obviates the need for that hypothesis.

Acknowledgments: This work was supported by awards from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (U54HL141981) (P.L.) and the American Society of Hematology Medical Student Physician-Scientist Award (I.W.S.).

Contribution: All authors designed and performed research, analyzed data, and cowrote the manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: P.L. is an inventor on patents claiming compositions of matter that include modified fVIII proteins.

Correspondence: Pete Lollar, Department of Pediatrics, Room 438, Emory Children's Center Emory University, 2015 Uppergate Dr, Atlanta, GA 30322; e-mail: jlollar@emory.edu.

1.
Springer
TA
.
Biology and physics of von Willebrand factor concatamers
.
J Thromb Haemost
.
2011
;
9
(
Suppl. 1
):
130
-
143
.
2.
Lodge
TP
,
Hiemenz
PC
.
Polymer Conformations Polymer Chemistry
. 3rd ed..
CRC Press
;
2020
.
3.
Slayter
H
,
Loscalzo
J
,
Bockenstedt
P
,
Handin
RI
.
Native conformation of human von Willebrand protein. Analysis by electron microscopy and quasi-elastic light scattering
.
J Biol Chem
.
1985
;
260
(
14
):
8559
-
8563
.
4.
Fowler
WE
,
Fretto
LJ
,
Hamilton
KK
,
Erickson
HP
,
McKee
PA
.
Substructure of human von Willebrand factor
.
J Clin Invest
.
1985
;
76
(
4
):
1491
-
1500
.
5.
Zhou
YF
,
Eng
ET
,
Nishida
N
,
Lu
CF
,
Walz
T
,
Springer
TA
.
A pH-regulated dimeric bouquet in the structure of von Willebrand factor
.
EMBO J
.
2011
;
30
(
19
):
4098
-
4111
.
6.
Fu
HX
,
Jiang
Y
,
Yang
DR
,
Scheiflinger
F
,
Wong
WP
,
Springer
TA
.
Flow-induced elongation of von Willebrand factor precedes tension-dependent activation
.
Nat Commun
.
2017
;
8
(
1
):
324
.
7.
Sing
CE
,
Alexander-Katz
A
.
Elongational flow induces the unfolding of von Willebrand factor at physiological flow rates
.
Biophys J
.
2010
;
98
(
9
):
L35
-
L37
.
8.
Springer
TA
,
von Willebrand factor
.
Jedi knight of the bloodstream
.
Blood
.
2014
;
124
(
9
):
1412
-
1425
.
9.
Parker
ET
,
Lollar
P
.
Conformation of the von Willebrand factor/factor VIII complex in quasi-static flow
.
J Biol Chem
.
2021
;
296
:
100420
.
10.
Parker
ET
,
Haberichter
SL
,
Lollar
P
.
Subunit flexibility of multimeric von Willebrand factor/factor VIII complexes
.
ACS Omega
.
2022
;
7
(
35
):
31183
-
31196
.
11.
Santagostino
E
.
More than a decade of international experience with a pdFVIII/VWF concentrate in immune tolerance
.
Haemophilia
.
2013
;
19
(
Suppl. 1
):
8
-
11
.
12.
Federici
AB
,
Barillari
G
,
Zanon
E
, et al
.
Efficacy and safety of highly purified, doubly virus-inactivated VWF/FVIII concentrates in inherited von Willebrand’s disease: results of an Italian cohort study on 120 patients characterized by bleeding severity score
.
Haemophilia
.
2010
;
16
(
1
):
101
-
110
.
13.
Berry
GC
.
Thermodynamic and conformational properties of polystyrene. I. Light-scattering studies on dilute solutions of linear polystyrenes
.
J Chem Phys
.
1966
;
44
(
12
):
4550
-
4564
.
14.
Andersson
M
,
Wittgren
B
,
Wahlund
KG
.
Accuracy in multiangle light scattering measurements for molar mass and radius estimations. Model calculations and experiments
.
Anal Chem
.
2003
;
75
(
16
):
4279
-
4291
.
15.
Ortega
A
,
Garcia de la Torre
J
.
Equivalent radii and ratios of radii from solution properties as indicators of macromolecular conformation, shape, and flexibility
.
Biomacromolecules
.
2007
;
8
(
8
):
2464
-
2475
.
16.
Koppel
DE
.
Analysis of macromolecular polydispersity in intensity correlation spectroscopy: method of cumulants
.
J Chem Phys
.
1972
;
57
(
11
):
4814
-
4820
.
17.
Frisken
BJ
.
Revisiting the method of cumulants for the analysis of dynamic light-scattering data
.
Appl Opt
.
2001
;
40
(
24
):
4087
-
4091
.
18.
Stetefeld
J
,
McKenna
SA
,
Patel
TR
.
Dynamic light scattering: a practical guide and applications in biomedical sciences
.
Biophys Rev
.
2016
;
8
(
4
):
409
-
427
.
19.
Harding
SE
,
Abdelhameed
AS
,
Morris
GA
.
On the hydrodynamic analysis of conformation in mixed biopolymer systems
.
Polym Int
.
2010
;
60
(
1
):
2
-
8
.
20.
Garcia de la Torre
J
,
Cifre
JGH
.
Hydrodynamic properties of biomacromolecules and macromolecular complexes: concepts and methods. A tutorial mini-review
.
J Mol Biol
.
2020
;
432
(
9
):
2930
-
2948
.
21.
Ortega
A
,
de la Torre
JG
.
Hydrodynamic properties of rodlike and disklike particles in dilute solution
.
J Chem Phys
.
2003
;
119
(
18
):
9914
-
9919
.
22.
Flory
PJ
. Configurational and frictional properties of the polymer molecule in dilute solution.
Principles of Polymer Chemistry
.
Cornell University Press
;
1953
.
23.
Vischer
UM
,
Wagner
DD
.
Von Willebrand factor proteolytic processing and multimerization precede the formation of Weibel-Palade bodies
.
Blood
.
1994
;
83
(
12
):
3536
-
3544
.

Author notes

Data are available on request from corresponding author, Pete Lollar (jlollar@emory.edu).