Abstract
Background: 95% of HIV- and HCV-infections among PWHs occurred with use of contaminated blood products prior to 1985. Overall, 20% to 90% of PWHs in developed countries have HIV- and/or HCV-infection. We compared country-specific public health approaches, judicial activities, and compensation for these viral infections.
Methods: Reports from hemophilia organizations, national ministries of health, published articles, and the World Federation of Hemophilia were reviewed.
Results: Except for the United States, the number of PWHs who developed HCV-infection from contaminated blood products was 1.5 to 3-fold as great as for HIV-infection- as a result of delayed use of heat-treated blood products, importation in late 1984 of HCV-infected non-heat treated blood products from the United States, and failure to use surrogate laboratory marker hepatitis screening tests. Compensation funds for HIV-infected PWHs were established in Japan ($521,000 at Dx); France ($305,000 at Dx; $102,000 for AIDS); the United States ($115,000 at Dx); Ireland ($106,000 at Dx); the United Kingdom ($55,000 at Dx); Australia ($48,000 at Dx); Canada ($13,000 at Dx/$18,000/yr); Germany ($12,000/yr for HIV; $24,000/yr for AIDS); and Italy ($6,000/yr; $82,000 at death). Compensation has also been provided to HCV-infected PWHs in Ireland ($266,000 at Dx); Canada ($251,000 at Dx); the United Kingdom ($33,000 at Dx; $42,000 if w/liver damage); and Italy ($10,000/yr; $37,000 at death).
Conclusions: In most developed countries, despite a greater number of HCV-versus HIV-infected PWHs, markedly less attention has been paid to HCV-infected PWHs. All countries should review HCV-related blood safety decisions made in the 1980s and consider providing compensation to HCV-infected PWHs.
Country -PWH (thousands) . | % PWH with HIV:HCV . | Man-dated HIV ELISA (date) . | Man-dated heat Rx factor (date) . | Anti-HBc marker screening (date) . | Nat’l Funds for HIV/HCV among PWHs (year) . | Nat’l Panels for HIV/HCV decisions (year) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USA-20 | 50%:30% | Mar 85 | Oct 84 | Oct 84 | 96/none | 95/none |
Italy- 8.7 | 23%:55% | Mar 85 | Jul 85 | None | 92/98 | 92/05 |
GDR- 6 | 47%:90% | Oct 85 | Oct 85 | None | 95/none | 94/none |
UK-6 | 28%:80% | Oct 85 | Jun 85 | None | 88/03 | 87/05 |
France-4 | 50%:90% | Aug 85 | Oct 85 | None | 89/none | 91/none |
Japan-3.4 | 60%:90% | Nov 86 | Jun 86 | None | 88/none | 96/none |
Canada-2 | 40%:88% | Nov 85 | Jul 85 | None | 89/98 | 97/none |
Australia-1.5 | 31%:90% | May 85 | Jan 85 | None | 89/none | 88/none |
Ireland-0.3 | 36%:76% | Oct 85 | Feb 85 | None | 91/97 | 91/97 |
Country -PWH (thousands) . | % PWH with HIV:HCV . | Man-dated HIV ELISA (date) . | Man-dated heat Rx factor (date) . | Anti-HBc marker screening (date) . | Nat’l Funds for HIV/HCV among PWHs (year) . | Nat’l Panels for HIV/HCV decisions (year) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USA-20 | 50%:30% | Mar 85 | Oct 84 | Oct 84 | 96/none | 95/none |
Italy- 8.7 | 23%:55% | Mar 85 | Jul 85 | None | 92/98 | 92/05 |
GDR- 6 | 47%:90% | Oct 85 | Oct 85 | None | 95/none | 94/none |
UK-6 | 28%:80% | Oct 85 | Jun 85 | None | 88/03 | 87/05 |
France-4 | 50%:90% | Aug 85 | Oct 85 | None | 89/none | 91/none |
Japan-3.4 | 60%:90% | Nov 86 | Jun 86 | None | 88/none | 96/none |
Canada-2 | 40%:88% | Nov 85 | Jul 85 | None | 89/98 | 97/none |
Australia-1.5 | 31%:90% | May 85 | Jan 85 | None | 89/none | 88/none |
Ireland-0.3 | 36%:76% | Oct 85 | Feb 85 | None | 91/97 | 91/97 |
Author notes
Corresponding author