Introduction: Platelet concentrates (PC) collected by apheresis are effective in supporting deeply thrombocytopenic patients. The reduced risk of multiple allogeneic exposure and transmissible infectious diseases together with the high WBC depletion and diminished transfusion reactions are the main advantages offered by PC transfusion. At moment, the availability of several synthetic solutions for platelets storage permits to prepare hyperconcentrate(dry) apheresis platelets with the advantage of reducing febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions and, in low body weight patients the citrate toxicity, without the necessity of further manipulations. The aim of this study was to test the quality of 20 dry platelets (DP) in comparison to 20 standard plateletpheresis (SP) concentrates.

Materials and methods: A total of 40 apheresis procedures were performed by the single-needle Cobe Trima separation device (Gambro BCT, Lakewood, CO, USA) collecting either DP or SP concentrates. Within 1h after collection, the bag containing DP was added with the appropriate amount (70% of DP final volume) of synthetic solution for platelets storage (SSP, MacoPharma). Both DP and SP concentrates were stored at room temperature with gentle agitation for 4 days. For both concentrates, platelet yield was calculated and in vitro studies of membrane glycoproteins expression and aggregation at day +1 and day +4 were carried out.

Results: The comparison between 20 DP and 20 SP concentrates in terms of ability to aggregate in vitro and membrane glycoproteins expression at day +1 and day +4 of storage is reported in table A and B respectively.

Conclusions: The in vitro tests documented a major activation of dry platelets. In particular, the ability to aggregate was reduced in the 20 DP concentrates analised and this phenomenon was more evident at day +4 of storage. The alteration of membrane glycoproteins expression (markers of storage lesion) confirms the lower in vitro quality of DP concentrates. The effectiveness of this new blood component in vivo should be evaluated in a controlled clinical trial.

Table A.
At collectionDay +1Day +4
SPDPSPDPSPDP
Collagen μg/ml 4 
93 88 97 82 80 53 
ADP 10 μM 
32 11 24 16 16 
Ristocetin 1.5 mg/ml 
91 97 77 81 71 52 
Collagen 10 μg/ml + Adrenaline 10 μM 
98 95 93 94 93 80 
ADP 10 μM + Adrenaline 10 μM 
87 72 76 61 57 30 
At collectionDay +1Day +4
SPDPSPDPSPDP
Collagen μg/ml 4 
93 88 97 82 80 53 
ADP 10 μM 
32 11 24 16 16 
Ristocetin 1.5 mg/ml 
91 97 77 81 71 52 
Collagen 10 μg/ml + Adrenaline 10 μM 
98 95 93 94 93 80 
ADP 10 μM + Adrenaline 10 μM 
87 72 76 61 57 30 
Table B.
At collectionDay +1Day +4
SP DP SP DP SP DP 
GPIb alfa (MFI) 
5.06 5.75 6.31 6.13 5.26 4.54 
GPIIb-IIIa (MFI) 
35.47 36.71 34.61 37.7 31.76 40.9 
GP IV (MFI) 
11.49 11.4 11.67 10.28 11.65 11.38 
GP 53 
24.23 27.11 21.74 25.91 21.46 31.84 
GMP 140 
21.79 29.29 22.65 30.38 20.58 34.89 
At collectionDay +1Day +4
SP DP SP DP SP DP 
GPIb alfa (MFI) 
5.06 5.75 6.31 6.13 5.26 4.54 
GPIIb-IIIa (MFI) 
35.47 36.71 34.61 37.7 31.76 40.9 
GP IV (MFI) 
11.49 11.4 11.67 10.28 11.65 11.38 
GP 53 
24.23 27.11 21.74 25.91 21.46 31.84 
GMP 140 
21.79 29.29 22.65 30.38 20.58 34.89 

Author notes

Corresponding author

Sign in via your Institution