Abstract
Background: The addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy (R-CHOP) has resulted in a marked improvement in outcome for patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The previously estimated risk factors needed to be re-evaluated in immunochemotherapy era. Shen et al. (
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with R-CHOP to assess the value of the IPI and R-IPI.
Results: From January 2004 to July 2006, 113 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients from four Korean institutes were included. Patients characteristics were: median age 54 y (range: 14–83), male 62.8%, extranodal disease 54.9%, age greater than 60y 40.7%, ECOG PS greater than 2 10.6%, elevated LDH 46.9%, more than 1 extranodal sites 17.7%, stage III/IV 40.7%. The 3 year EFS rate was 60.2% and the 3 year OS rate was 66.7%. Estimated 3 year EFS and OS according to IPI were described in the table.
Conclusions: The IPI score as well as R-IPI was an important prognostic parameter in unselected Korean DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP.
. | No of Pt . | 3 year EFS (%) . | p-value . | 3 year OS (%) . | p-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No of IPI | <0.001 | 0.001 | |||
0 | 22 | 78.6 | 83.3 | ||
1 | 40 | 71.8 | 81.9 | ||
2 | 28 | 59.3 | 61.8 | ||
3 | 16 | 36.5 | 42.4 | ||
4 | 6 | 16.7 | 22.8 | ||
5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
IPI | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
Low | 62 | 74.7 | 82.8 | ||
Low intermediate | 28 | 79.3 | 61.8 | ||
High intermediate | 16 | 36.5 | 42.4 | ||
High | 7 | 14.3 | 16.7 | ||
R-IPI | <0.001 | 0.008 | |||
Very good | 22 | 78.6 | 83.3 | ||
Good | 68 | 65.8 | 71.6 | ||
Poor | 23 | 28.1 | 34.9 |
. | No of Pt . | 3 year EFS (%) . | p-value . | 3 year OS (%) . | p-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No of IPI | <0.001 | 0.001 | |||
0 | 22 | 78.6 | 83.3 | ||
1 | 40 | 71.8 | 81.9 | ||
2 | 28 | 59.3 | 61.8 | ||
3 | 16 | 36.5 | 42.4 | ||
4 | 6 | 16.7 | 22.8 | ||
5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
IPI | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
Low | 62 | 74.7 | 82.8 | ||
Low intermediate | 28 | 79.3 | 61.8 | ||
High intermediate | 16 | 36.5 | 42.4 | ||
High | 7 | 14.3 | 16.7 | ||
R-IPI | <0.001 | 0.008 | |||
Very good | 22 | 78.6 | 83.3 | ||
Good | 68 | 65.8 | 71.6 | ||
Poor | 23 | 28.1 | 34.9 |
Author notes
Disclosure: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.