Abstract
Introduction: Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a new treatment for B non Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) patients. 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin®) consists of a murine monoclonal antibody to CD20, conjugated to a metal chelator tiuxetan for retention of the beta emitter 90Y. Thus Zevalin® delivers radiation to B-NHL, combining the tumor targeting attributes of a monoclonal antibody and the beta radiation of 90Y. Zevalin® is approved for the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) refractory to or relapsed after rituximab, on the bases of clinical trials where it achieved a response rate as high as 83%. Several ongoing registrational trials are evaluating the efficacy of Zevalin® in other NHL, as diffuse large B cell (DLCL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We are here evaluating the effect of Zevalin® as consolidation therapy in NHL patients that achieved a complete clinical response (CCR) with chemotherapy.
Methods: In B cell NHL patients that achieved a CCR after 1st or multiple lines anthracyclines based chemotherapy +/− Rituximab, minimal residual disease was evaluated by PCR on bone marrow samples, for the following rearrangements: JH, Bcl-1, Bcl-2. Patients received Zevalin® 6-9 weeks post chemotherapy. Evaluation of molecular response was assessed after a follow up period at 12 weeks. The aim of the study was the role of Zevalin® in inducing a complete molecular response (CMR).
Results: 23 B-NHL patients (13 FL, 6 MCL, 4 DLCL; male:female 13:10, median age 63, range 42–73. See table) in a CCR after chemotherapy (documented by TC scan and/or PET-scan negative for abnormal lesions or glucose captation) have been enrolled. 10 patients had a pathological rearrangement before RIT, while 13 were already in a CMR condition. Zevalin® was completed in all 23 patients and the post infusion evaluation was performed after 12 weeks. In the follow-up period thrombocitopenia was commonly documented, but it was not associated to bleeding or need of platelet transfusion, but in one singular case. After 12 weeks from RIT a new molecular evaluation was performed on bone marrow samples. All the 23 patients have completed the 12 weeks follow-up: 8 of 10 (80%) patients positive before RIT achieved a CMR with Zevalin® administration. The 13 PCR negative patients maintained the CMR. The 21 PCR negative patients are now under follow-up to evaluate the molecular disease free survival after Zevalin® RIT.
Conclusion: Zevalin® is an efficient consolidation therapy in B cell NHL patients after chemotherapy. In this series of patients Zevalin® administration allowed to convert 8 of 10 CCR to CMR. In the remaining 13 patients Zevalin® maintained the CMR. Zevalin® addition to medication treatment is feasible and associated with manageable hematological toxicity.
Pts . | disease . | sex . | age . | previous chemotherapy lines . | molecular response before RIT . | molecular response after RIT . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FL | M | 68 | 1 | POS | NEG |
2 | FL | F | 53 | 1 | NEG | NEG |
3 | FL | M | 54 | 1 | NEG | NEG |
4 | FL | M | 51 | 4 | NEG | NEG |
5 | DLCL | F | 66 | 2 | POS | NEG |
6 | DLCL | F | 67 | 1 | NEG | NEG |
7 | FL | F | 42 | 1 | POS | POS |
8 | FL | M | 52 | 1 | POS | NEG |
9 | FL | F | 54 | 3 | NEG | NEG |
10 | FL | M | 57 | 2 | POS | NEG |
11 | FL | F | 62 | 2 | POS | NEG |
12 | FL | M | 58 | 2 | POS | NEG |
13 | FL | F | 69 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
14 | MCL | M | 62 | 1 | POS | NEG |
15 | MCL | M | 66 | 1 | POS | POS |
16 | MCL | M | 66 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
17 | MCL | M | 67 | 1 | POS | NEG |
18 | FL | F | 67 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
19 | DLCL | F | 67 | 3 | NEG | NEG |
20 | MCL | M | 70 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
21 | FL | M | 61 | 4 | NEG | NEG |
22 | DLCL | M | 43 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
23 | MCL | F | 73 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
Pts . | disease . | sex . | age . | previous chemotherapy lines . | molecular response before RIT . | molecular response after RIT . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FL | M | 68 | 1 | POS | NEG |
2 | FL | F | 53 | 1 | NEG | NEG |
3 | FL | M | 54 | 1 | NEG | NEG |
4 | FL | M | 51 | 4 | NEG | NEG |
5 | DLCL | F | 66 | 2 | POS | NEG |
6 | DLCL | F | 67 | 1 | NEG | NEG |
7 | FL | F | 42 | 1 | POS | POS |
8 | FL | M | 52 | 1 | POS | NEG |
9 | FL | F | 54 | 3 | NEG | NEG |
10 | FL | M | 57 | 2 | POS | NEG |
11 | FL | F | 62 | 2 | POS | NEG |
12 | FL | M | 58 | 2 | POS | NEG |
13 | FL | F | 69 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
14 | MCL | M | 62 | 1 | POS | NEG |
15 | MCL | M | 66 | 1 | POS | POS |
16 | MCL | M | 66 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
17 | MCL | M | 67 | 1 | POS | NEG |
18 | FL | F | 67 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
19 | DLCL | F | 67 | 3 | NEG | NEG |
20 | MCL | M | 70 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
21 | FL | M | 61 | 4 | NEG | NEG |
22 | DLCL | M | 43 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
23 | MCL | F | 73 | 2 | NEG | NEG |
Author notes
Disclosure: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.