Abstract
Over-expression of the MN1 gene has been reported in AML, and appears to be associated with the inv(16) subgroup. In a study of 142 patients with normal karyotype (NK) it was found to be an adverse prognostic factor for CR and overall survival in older patients (
Methods: cDNA was generated using random priming and MuLV reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems). MN1 exon 1 forward, ATTGACCTGGACTCGCTGATG (
Results: The median age of patients was 46 years (range 17–68); median follow up was 7.1 years. 107/196 patients were randomised to receive ATRA. MN1 status, whether viewed as high/low, or as a continuous variable was not significantly associated with age, white blood count (WBC) or sex; patients with normal karyotype were found to have lower MN1 levels (p<0.0001), patients with inv(16) or adverse cytogenetics tended to have higher MN1 levels (p=0.001, p=0.0007). Patients with NPM1 mutations, or FLT3-ITD mutations tended to have lower MN1 levels (p<0.0001, p=0.02 respectively). There was no significant impact of MN1 levels on remission rates, overall survival (OS) or relapse in either univariate analyses or those adjusted for age, WBC, sex, cytogenetics, performance status, de Novo/Secondary disease, FLT3-ITD and NPM1 status (effect sizes per log increase in MN1: CR adjusted OR 0.80 (0.42–1.52) p=0.5; OS adjusted HR 0.92 (0.69–1.23) p=0.6; Relapse adjusted HR 1.20 (0.83–1.72) p=0.3). Results were similar if analyses were restricted to normal karyotype patients. Overall there was no significant effect of ATRA, as reported previously (Burnett et al ASH 2002 abstract 529). There was no significant interaction between MN1 level and ATRA treatment for CR (unadjusted p=0.7; adjusted p=0.8) or overall survival (unadjusted p=0.9; adjusted p=0.8). However, in adjusted analyses there was a suggestion that the effect of ATRA on relapse was greater in patients with low MN1 levels (adjusted p=0.08). Similarly, looking at the normal karyotype group only there was no evidence of interaction on CR (adjusted p=0.4) or OS (adjusted p=0.9), with a similar greater effect of ATRA on relapse in low MN1 level patients (adjusted p=0.02).
Conclusions: The data show a possible interaction between MN1 and ATRA treatment on relapse when adjusted for other baseline variables, but no evidence of prognostic value, nor that any effect of ATRA is moderated by MN1 when considering remission or survival.
Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Author notes
Corresponding author