High-Resolution Molecular Allelokaryotyping of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Blast Crisis by 6.0 SNP-Arrays Shows a High-Frequency of Uniparental Disomy and Focal Copy Number Alterations Affecting the Whole Sequence or Specific Exons of Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressor Genes.

Abstract 2176

Poster Board II-153

Progression from chronic phase to blast crisis (BC) remains a major hurdle on the road to effective treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). BC is known to be associated with accumulation of additional genetic alterations, but these alterations have so far been only partially characterized. The development of SNP-arrays as a tool for high-resolution karyotyping now allows to perform high-throughput genome-wide screens for submicroscopic genomic alterations with unprecedented informativity and resolution and to precisely map all the genes involved in these alterations. We have used Human 6.0 SNP Arrays (Affymetrix) to perform high-resolution molecular allelokaryotyping of 25 DNA samples from BC (myeloid, n=16; lymphoid, n=9) CML patients (pts). The 6.0 SNP Array technology relies on 1.8 million markers evenly spaced across the genome, with a median inter-marker distance <700 bp. Loss of Heterozygosity (LOH) analysis identified several recurrent regions of uniparental disomy (UPD) ranging from 970Kb to 2.4Mb: 3p21.31-3p21.2 (19 pts); 4p15.1 (n=18 pts); 14q23.3 (n=18 pts); 8q22.2 (n=15 pts); 7q31.31 (n=14 pts); 3q11.2 (13 pts); 17q23.2 (n=13 pts); 12q24.11-12q24.13 (n=12 pts); 15q15.2-15q15.3 (n=12 pts); 16q22.1 (n=12 pts); 10q22.1-10q22.2 (n=11 pts); 1p34.3 (n=10pts); 7q11.22 (n=10 pts); 8p11.12 (n=10 pts); 15q23-15q24.1 (n=9 pts); 20q11.22-20q11.23 (n=7 pts); 16q11.2 (n=6 pts); 17q11.2 (n=5 pts). Three pts had evidence of UPD involving the whole long arm of chromosomes 5, 14 and 19, respectively. Macroscopic copy number alterations (CNAs) (+8, +19, +14q; +21q; -7; -18, -16q; -17p; -6p; -6q; -9q) were frequent and easily detected. A variety of submicroscopic CNAs were also detected. However, we decided to exploit the unprecedented resolution power of Human 6.0 SNP Arrays and the ability of Genotyping Console 3.0.2 (Affymetrix) software to precisely pinpoint the borders of these CNAs. We thus aimed our analysis to the identification of very small CNAs that may have been missed by previous studies - all using less sensitive assays. This approach revealed a high number of focal gains or losses ranging from 4 to 47Kb, affecting single genes or even some exons only. Genes involved in >2 pts are listed in the Table below. Gains/losses mapping to known regions of copy number variation (CNV) were excluded.