Abstract
Abstract 4330
Immunomodulatory drugs have recently changed the treatment options in multiple myeloma. Moreover, thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide have also been used in the setting of allografting as post-transplant salvage therapy or as maintenance. We are currently evaluating the impact of new drugs as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma before a planned standard autograft followed by a non-myeloablative allograft (Tandem auto-allo).
Twenty-five newly diagnosed patients (median age 55 years old, range 26-65) entered a recently designed prospective phase II program of tandem auto-allo which included the use of so-called new drugs during induction. Here, we report data on the first 11 evaluable patients with a follow up of at least 1 month after the allograft. Induction consisted of lenalidomide and dexamethasone (n=5), thalidomide and dexamethasone (n=4), or bortemomib-containing regimens (n=2), followed by G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cell harvest. A standard autograft after melphalan 200 mg/m2 was planned 2-4 months before a low-dose (2 Gy) TBI-based allograft from an HLA-identical sibling. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporin and mycophenolate mofetil. Disease status at allografting and post-transplant outcomes were compared to those of 22 patients pair-matched for beta2microglobulin and age, who underwent tandem auto-allo after induction with VAD-based regimens without new drugs (Blood, 2009).
At the time of allografting after induction with new drugs and the autograft overall response rate was 81% (9/11), including a immunofixation-negative complete remission (CR). Following allografting, all patients promptly achieved donor engraftment. After a median follow-up of 11 months (2-26), all patients are alive and the overall response rate was 91% (10/11). Incidence of grade II-IV GVHD was 34% (4/11), including 1 patient with grade III GVHD. Chronic GVHD was observed in 40% (4/10) of patients with at least 3 months of follow-up. The induction with new drugs did not increase allotransplant-related toxicity or incidence of acute GVHD (Table 1). We observed a higher response disease before allografting in patients treated with new drugs.
Induction with lenalidomide, thalidomide or bortezomib does not impact feasibility and safety of tandem auto-allo. Longer follow up and a larger cohort of patients are necessary to evaluate the impact of new drugs in improving disease control post-tandem auto-allo.
Induction . | New drugs . | No new drugs . |
---|---|---|
No | 11 | 22 |
ISS equal or higher than 2 | 3 | 6 |
Median age (range), years | 55 (43-65) | 52 (40-62) |
Disease status at allografting: | ||
- Refractory disease | 2 (18%) | 6 (27%) |
- Partial response (PR) and very good PR | 8 (73%) | 15 (68%) |
- Complete remission | 1 (9%) | 1 (5%) |
Acute GVHD grade II/grade III-IV | 3 (27%)/1 (9%) | 6 (27%)/5 (23%) |
Induction . | New drugs . | No new drugs . |
---|---|---|
No | 11 | 22 |
ISS equal or higher than 2 | 3 | 6 |
Median age (range), years | 55 (43-65) | 52 (40-62) |
Disease status at allografting: | ||
- Refractory disease | 2 (18%) | 6 (27%) |
- Partial response (PR) and very good PR | 8 (73%) | 15 (68%) |
- Complete remission | 1 (9%) | 1 (5%) |
Acute GVHD grade II/grade III-IV | 3 (27%)/1 (9%) | 6 (27%)/5 (23%) |
Patriarca:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmion: Consultancy, advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, advisory committees, Research Funding.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.