Abstract
Background: Immune tolerance therapy (ITT) is the only available therapy for eliminating the inhibitor in patients with haemophilia and high-responding inhibitors. However, it is a very expensive treatment with an efficacy of up to 60%-75%. Factors influencing the outcome of ITT are not completely understood. Some studies have suggested that plasma derived factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates might offer certain advantages in the elimination of the inhibitor when compared with recombinant derivatives. The presence of von Willebrand factor (Auerswald et al,Haematologica 2003;88:EREP05; Kreuz et al,Haematologica 2001;86:16-20) and some molecules with immunomodulatory effect like anti-idiotype antibodies, transforming growth factor-β, HLA type I molecules and soluble FAS ligand in plasma derived concentrates may be involved in such effect (Berntorp et al,Haemophilia 2001;7:109-13; Hodge et al,Br J Haematol 2001;115:376-81; Hodge et al, Haemophilia 2006;12:133-9; Ghio et al, Thromb Haemost 2003;89:365-73). The activated prothrombin complex concentrate (FEIBA®) is a plasma derived product used for bleeding control in patients with haemophilia A and high-responding inhibitors. We hypothesize that FEIBA® may have an immunomodulatory activity due to its plasmatic origin. This effect might be observed in patients with intense treatment with FEIBA® (e.g. prophylaxis treatment) by the reduction in levels of antibodies against FVIII compared with patients on demand treatment with this product.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare levels of inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors on demand or under prophylactic treatment with FEIBA®.
Methods and results: This was a prospective, observational and multicenter study. A total of 12 adult patients with severe haemophilia A and high-responding inhibitors (6 patients on demand and 6 patients under prophylaxis treatment with FEIBA®) were included. All patients had normal levels of serum creatinine, serum alanine aminotransferase and CD4+ lymphocyte counts at inclusion. Levels of inhibitors were determined by Bethesda assay. Levels of inhibitors in patients on prophylaxis with FEIBA® were lower than those observed in patients on demand treatment but differences were not statistical significant. In most of the patients on prophylaxis, levels of inhibitors went down along the prophylaxis regimen.
Patient Nº . | Age . | Type of treatment . | Usual dose (IU/kg) . | Frecuency . | Titer (BU) . | Time frame with start of prophylaxis (months)** . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
480101 | 53 | Prophylaxis | 60 | Three times a week | 64* | 4.4 |
80 | 4.1 | |||||
96 | 1.3 | |||||
250 | -1.3 | |||||
480102 | 58 | Prophylaxis | 55 | Three times a week | 5* | 3.3 |
12 | 2.1 | |||||
7 | -3.8 | |||||
12 | -6.1 | |||||
150101 | UNK | Prophylaxis | 60 | Three times a week | 4* | 3.0 |
5 | -6.0 | |||||
6 | -8.0 | |||||
280101 | 28 | Prophylaxis | 56 | Every other day | 109* | 7.3 |
77 | 4.1 | |||||
101 | -8.3 | |||||
101 | -9.7 | |||||
280102 | 57 | On Demand | 56 x 8 doses | N/A | 174* | N/A |
37 | N/A | |||||
83 | N/A | |||||
21 | N/A | |||||
25 | N/A | |||||
184 | N/A | |||||
280103 | 57 | On Demand | 55 x 6 doses | N/A | 8000* | N/A |
64 | N/A | |||||
5 | N/A | |||||
21 | N/A | |||||
280104 | 58 | On Demand | 68 x 6 doses | N/A | 152* | N/A |
280105 | 23 | On Demand | 68 x 3 doses 40 x 6 doses | N/A | 30* | N/A |
080101 | 28 | On Demand | 50 x 5 doses | N/A | 5.2* | N/A |
7.0 | ||||||
7.2 | ||||||
4.0 | ||||||
7.8 | ||||||
460101 | 37 | Prophylaxis | 66 | every 48h | Negative | 21,0 |
460102 | 57 | On demand | 70 | 2 doses/ bleeding usually | 66.5* | More than 20 years |
300001 | 50 | Prophylaxis | 85 | Three times a week | 8* | 3 |
Patient Nº . | Age . | Type of treatment . | Usual dose (IU/kg) . | Frecuency . | Titer (BU) . | Time frame with start of prophylaxis (months)** . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
480101 | 53 | Prophylaxis | 60 | Three times a week | 64* | 4.4 |
80 | 4.1 | |||||
96 | 1.3 | |||||
250 | -1.3 | |||||
480102 | 58 | Prophylaxis | 55 | Three times a week | 5* | 3.3 |
12 | 2.1 | |||||
7 | -3.8 | |||||
12 | -6.1 | |||||
150101 | UNK | Prophylaxis | 60 | Three times a week | 4* | 3.0 |
5 | -6.0 | |||||
6 | -8.0 | |||||
280101 | 28 | Prophylaxis | 56 | Every other day | 109* | 7.3 |
77 | 4.1 | |||||
101 | -8.3 | |||||
101 | -9.7 | |||||
280102 | 57 | On Demand | 56 x 8 doses | N/A | 174* | N/A |
37 | N/A | |||||
83 | N/A | |||||
21 | N/A | |||||
25 | N/A | |||||
184 | N/A | |||||
280103 | 57 | On Demand | 55 x 6 doses | N/A | 8000* | N/A |
64 | N/A | |||||
5 | N/A | |||||
21 | N/A | |||||
280104 | 58 | On Demand | 68 x 6 doses | N/A | 152* | N/A |
280105 | 23 | On Demand | 68 x 3 doses 40 x 6 doses | N/A | 30* | N/A |
080101 | 28 | On Demand | 50 x 5 doses | N/A | 5.2* | N/A |
7.0 | ||||||
7.2 | ||||||
4.0 | ||||||
7.8 | ||||||
460101 | 37 | Prophylaxis | 66 | every 48h | Negative | 21,0 |
460102 | 57 | On demand | 70 | 2 doses/ bleeding usually | 66.5* | More than 20 years |
300001 | 50 | Prophylaxis | 85 | Three times a week | 8* | 3 |
*Titer at inclusion. **Positive values represent number of months after starting prophylaxis and negative values are referred to number of months before starting prophylaxis. For example, the patient number 480101 had 250 BU at 1.3 months before starting prophylaxis (in the table= -1.3 months) and 64 UB at month 4.4 after initiation of prophylaxis (in the table= 4.4 months). N/A: not applicable.
Conclusion: Prophylaxis with FEIBA® might decrease levels of inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia A and high-responding inhibitors. However, a broader study is needed to confirm this result.
Iruin:Baxalta: Research Funding. Bonanad:Baxalta: Research Funding. López Fernández:Baxalta: Research Funding. Altisent:Baxalta: Research Funding. García Candel:Baxalta: Research Funding. Rivas Pollmar:Baxalta: Research Funding. Canales:Baxalta: Research Funding.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.