Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains associated with increased mortality in immunocompromised populations, particularly in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Risk factors for reactivation include serostatus and occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Identifying new factors that modify the immune response against CMV might be of importance in HSCT recipients. There has been one study on the association between HLA alleles and CMV pneumonitis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT),1 but no study has tested the influence of a large number of alleles on CMV reactivation. We initiated a retrospective study on the effect of HLA alleles on CMV reactivation in the 144 consecutive recipients with a positive CMV serostatus at the time of transplantation who received an allogeneic transplant in our unit between October 1, 1996, and August 31, 1999. The donor was related in 98 patients. Weekly monitoring started from engraftment until day 100 after transplantation or longer. CMV reactivation was defined as a CMV pp65 antigenemia of at least 2 in 2 × 105 leukocytes. CMV infection was treated with ganciclovir or foscarnet, for 2 to 3 weeks or until 2 consecutive negative tests. Because immunity recovers essentially from the graft, we studied the effect of the HLA alleles of the donor. HLA alleles were considered if their phenotype frequency exceeded 10%. Univariable and multivariable prognostic analyses, performed on SAS 6.12 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), were based on Cox models, and assessing the effect of acute grade II-IV GVHD as time-dependent. Multivariable prognostic analysis used a stepwise selection, introducing covariates either previously selected as associated with outcome at the 10% level or reported as prognostic factors from the literature.

As of December 1, 1999, the median follow-up was 20 months after transplantation (range, 2 to 38 months). Ninety patients had developed CMV reactivation; only 12 had developed a CMV disease. The estimated rate of CMV reactivation was 64% at 3 months after transplantation. The estimated median time to CMV reactivation for patients with CMV infection, using time-to-event methods, was 45 days (95% CI, 39-48 days). Seventy-two patients had experienced acute grade II-IV GVHD. The estimated median time to GVHD was 18 days (95% CI, 16-21 days). In univariable analyses, GVHD was associated with CMV reactivation (HR [hazard ratio] = 1.73, P = .01), and 5 HLA alleles were associated with outcome at a 10% level. HLA-A11 (HR = 0.40, P = .03) and HLA-B51 (HR = 0.59,P = .07) were potentially protective against CMV reactivation, while HLA-DR7 (HR = 1.48, P = .08), HLA-DR15 (HR = 1.56, P = .06), and HLA-A24 (HR = 1.56,P = .08) increased the risk of CMV reactivation. These 5 alleles were introduced into a multivariable Cox model, jointly with age, type of donor (related vs unrelated), T-cell depletion, donor CMV serostatus, and acute grade II-IV GVHD. The 2 factors that were selected with prognostic influence were GVHD (HR = 1.71,P = .01) and HLA-A11 (HR = 0.41, P = .04). The median peak of antigenemia was not significantly different between HLA-A11 recipients and non-HLA-A11 recipients (22 and 13 positive leukocytes, respectively, P = .50, Wilcoxon rank sum test). But none of the 17 HLA-A11 patients suffered from CMV disease.

Our results were not corrected for the number of studied alleles; so it is possible that significant results were due to random chance. Bonferroni correction is likely overly conservative, and there is no clear consensus on how one should control for multiple comparisons. As one answer to this problem, we found that other data from the literature are consistent with some of our findings, especially regarding HLA-A11, HLA-DR7, and HLA-DR15. HLA-A11 protects against skin cancer after kidney transplantation,2 which is often humanPapillomavirus–related, and against Kaposi sarcoma in AIDS,3 a herpesvirus-related condition. An association between HLA-DR7 and CMV infection or disease has already been reported.4,5 We also corroborate a Japanese study, which suggested a deficient production of neutralizing antibodies against CMV in HLA-DR15 subjects.6 

Therefore, our results, backed up with other findings from the literature, clearly prompt for more investigations of HLA polymorphism influences on CMV reactivation in the HSCT setting, either on other series or on a multicenter database, in order to achieve higher statistical significance. Furthermore, large-scale studies could investigate influences of HLA types on CMV disease. If confirmed, our findings could provide additional insights into CMV reactivation pathophysiology and be relevant for the design of immunotherapy-oriented strategies.

1
Yamada
S
Takatsuka
H
Takemoto
Y
et al
Association of cytomegalovirus interstitial pneumonitis with HLA-type following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
Bone Marrow Transplant.
25
2000
861
865
2
Bouwes-Bavinck
JN
Kootte
AMM
van der Woude
FJ
Vandenbroucke
JP
Vermeer
BJ
Claas
FHJ
HLA-A11-associated resistance to skin cancer in renal transplant recipients.
N Engl J Med.
323
1990
1350
3
Winchester
R
Charron
D
Louie
L
et al
The role of HLA in influencing the time of development of a particular outcome of HIV-1 infection. In: Charron D, ed. Genetic diversity of HLA functional and medical implication. Volume 1.
1997
423
428
EDK Publisher
Paris, France
4
Blancho
G
Josien
R
Douillard
D
Bignon
JD
Cesbron
A
Soulillou
JP
The influence of HLA A-B-DR matching on cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation: evidence that HLA-DR7-matched recipients are more susceptible to cytomegalovirus disease.
Transplantation.
54
1992
871
874
5
Kraat
YJ
Christiaans
MHL
Nieman
FHM
van den Berg-Loonen
PM
van Hooff
JP
Bruggeman
CA
Increased frequency of CMV infection in HLA-DR7 matched renal allograft recipients.
Lancet.
341
1993
494
495
6
Wada
K
Mizuno
S
Ohta
H
Nishiyama
Y
Immune response to neutralizing epitope on human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B in Japanese: correlation of serologic response with HLA-type.
Microbiol Immunol.
41
1997
841
845
Sign in via your Institution