Abstract
Autoimmune thrombocytopenia is generally caused by autoantibodies against glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa or GPIb-IX and occasionally against GPIa-IIa or GPV. By investigating 38 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients on gold therapy, 10 with profound thrombocytopenia and 28 nonthrombocytopenic controls, we showed that in all 10 patients with thrombocytopenia, the platelet autoantibodies preferentially targeted GPV but the presence of gold was not required for their reactivity. Elevated levels of platelet-associated IgG (PAIgG) were observed in 8 of the 10 patients in whom the tests were performed. In 5 patients with sufficient autologous platelets, the GPV specificity of PAIgG was confirmed. Tests with GPV transfectants revealed that the antibodies reacted with GPV independent of GPIbα, GPIbβ, or GPIX. Autoantibodies recognizing GPV were not seen in the 28 nonthrombocytopenic control RA patients. Thus, GPV seems to be targeted in gold-induced autoimmune thrombocytopenia.
Introduction
Autoimmune thrombocytopenia (AITP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on gold therapy is a rare, but severe, event.1 Platelet autoantibodies generally target glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa or GPIb-IX,2-4 but GPIa-IIa5-7 and GPV8,9 may also be targeted. GPV is a leucine-rich repeat domain protein, present in 1 to 2 stoichiometry with GPIbα, GPIbβ, and GPIX.10GPV-specific autoantibodies occur in 10% to 20% of patients with AITP8,9 and are particularly evident in defined clinical groups, such as in childhood AITP associated with varicella infection11 and in multitransfused patients with bone marrow failure.12 We investigated platelet autoantibody specificity in 10 RA patients with gold-associated AITP to determine whether a particular glycoprotein is preferentially targeted. Our results indicate that the autoantibodies show near exclusive reactivity with GPV.
Study design
Platelets and sera from 38 RA patients treated with gold were examined for platelet autoantibodies. Of these 38, 10 had severe AITP; for 7 patients acute-phase platelet counts were available and the remaining 3 samples were from our AITP archive sample bank. The other 28 patients were controls without thrombocytopenia. In 8 of the patients with thrombocytopenia, autologous platelets were available for a direct immunofluorescence platelet-associated IgG (PAIgG) test and in 5 for a specificity investigation by direct monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) assay.13-15Indirect MAIPA tests using the patient's sera were performed in all 10 patients. In one archive case (patient 10), autoantibodies eluted from the patient's own platelets using ether16-18 were also tested.
Because it was likely that the patients' sera contained gold at the time of testing, the requirement of gold for antibody reactivity was assessed using protein G–purified IgG. Furthermore, possible augmentation of antibody binding by gold was investigated through the addition of sodium aurothiomalate as a source of gold at physiological concentrations19 during the MAIPA assay.
For direct immunofluorescence, the patients' platelets were washed using phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.01 M EDTA and 0.25% bovine serum albumin. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–conjugated rabbit anti–human IgG (1 μg per 5 × 106 platelets) was then added, and after 30 minutes at 20°C the platelets were washed again and examined for bound FITC by flow cytometry. The patients' own platelets were also used for the direct MAIPA as follows. After washing, platelets were incubated with these GP-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), used as either culture supernatants (1 in 10 dilution) or ascites (1 in 1000 dilution): RFGP56 for GPIIb-IIIa, CLB-MB45 for GPIb-IX, CLB-SW16 for GPV, and CLB-10G11 for GPIa-IIa. Following further washes, the platelets were solubilized and the lysates were added to microplate wells coated with goat anti–mouse Ig to capture the mAb-GP complexes. Bound human antibodies were then revealed with goat anti–human IgG. For the indirect MAIPA, sera were tested against platelets of known human platelet antigen (HPA) genotype. Results from all assays were compared with those obtained with platelets or sera from healthy blood donors tested in parallel.
Purified IgG fractions were prepared from 5 patients' sera using MAb Trap GII kits (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Bucks, England), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sera and IgG fractions were retested in MAIPA in the absence and presence of gold at final concentrations of 0.1 to 100 μg/mL.
In 4 patients with thrombocytopenia there were sufficient sera for a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a mouse fibroblast L-cell line20 stably expressing human GPV. A 3.5-kilobase (kb) DNA fragment encoding GPV was cloned into the ZEM229R expression vector and transfected as described previously.21 The assay was based on the indirect MAIPA, with the L cells incubated with the patients' sera and GPV-specific mAb before solubilization and subsequent capture of the mAb-GP complexes. Use of these transfectants enabled further definition of antibody specificity because, unlike platelets, GPV in these cells is expressed without the associated GPIbα, GPIbβ, and GPIX.
Results and discussion
Increased PAIgG levels were detected in all 8 AITP patients tested, with results between 1.9 and 22.8 times higher than in the negative controls (Table 1). Direct MAIPA in 5 patients tested showed almost exclusive GPV reactivity, with the ELISA OD values clearly greater than those obtained with controls (Table 1). Reactivity with capture mAbs against other GPs was negative in all but one patient (patient 7) in whom weak reactivity with GPIIb-IIIa, Ib-IX, and Ia-IIa was seen. The ELISA OD values with these additional GPs were all 0.36 or lower, which is considerably weaker than the value of greater than 3.5 with GPV (Table 1). The most likely explanation for this weak additional reactivity is incomplete membrane solubilization, but the presence of additional autoantibodies cannot be excluded. By indirect MAIPA, GPV antibodies were detected in the eluate from patient 10 and in sera of all but 2 patients (patients 1 and 10). Serum reactivity was weaker than reactivity in the direct tests, which is typical of blood cell autoimmunity when autoantibodies are predominantly cell-bound. Antibodies to GPIb-IX were not seen. The average OD for the 10 sera was 0.07 (SD = 0.06), and the negative control sera gave an average OD of 0.07 (SD = 0.07). Similarly, reactivity was not seen with GPIIb-IIIa or with GPIa-IIa.
Case . | Platelet count (× 109/L) . | Direct PIFT T/C ratio* . | OD values . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct MAIPA† . | Indirect MAIPA‡ . | |||||
Control . | Patient . | Control . | Patient . | |||
1 | 2 | 3.6 | 0.13 | 1.85 | 0.12 | 0.151-153 |
2 | 6 | 6.8 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.10 |
3 | 7 | 22.8 | nt | nt | 0.01 | 0.21 |
4 | 12 | nt | nt | nt | 0.01 | 0.21 |
5 | 35 | 8.8 | 0.01 | 1.63 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
6 | 58 | 3.9 | 0.13 | 1.07 | 0.12 | 0.29 |
7 | 60 | 1.9 | 0.03 | > 3.5 | 0.02 | 0.26 |
8 | na | positive | nt | nt | 0.23 | 0.60 |
9 | na | positive | nt | nt | 0.02 | 0.18 |
10 | na | na | nt | nt | 0.09 | 0.151-153 |
0.091-159 | 0.541-159 |
Case . | Platelet count (× 109/L) . | Direct PIFT T/C ratio* . | OD values . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct MAIPA† . | Indirect MAIPA‡ . | |||||
Control . | Patient . | Control . | Patient . | |||
1 | 2 | 3.6 | 0.13 | 1.85 | 0.12 | 0.151-153 |
2 | 6 | 6.8 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.10 |
3 | 7 | 22.8 | nt | nt | 0.01 | 0.21 |
4 | 12 | nt | nt | nt | 0.01 | 0.21 |
5 | 35 | 8.8 | 0.01 | 1.63 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
6 | 58 | 3.9 | 0.13 | 1.07 | 0.12 | 0.29 |
7 | 60 | 1.9 | 0.03 | > 3.5 | 0.02 | 0.26 |
8 | na | positive | nt | nt | 0.23 | 0.60 |
9 | na | positive | nt | nt | 0.02 | 0.18 |
10 | na | na | nt | nt | 0.09 | 0.151-153 |
0.091-159 | 0.541-159 |
Flow cytometry test results as a ratio of the test result (T) compared with the control (C). Samples 8 and 9 were tested by microscopy.
Results from control healthy donor platelets and patient's own platelets tested in parallel, using SW16 anti-GPV as capture mAb.
Average result from testing at least 3 cells previously incubated with the blood group AB control sera and patient's serum tested in parallel, using SW16 anti-GPV as capture mAb.
Result not above cut-off of twice the control result.
Autoantibodies were eluted from the patient's platelets and tested by MAIPA.
na, not available, archive samples referred to in the text; nt, not tested.
GPV-specific antibodies were detectable in purified IgG from all 5 patients tested (OD values 0.34 or greater; Table2). Addition of gold to the sera and purified IgG at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 100 μg/mL did not enhance reactivity (Table 2). These results indicate that gold does not act as a hapten. It therefore appears to break tolerance for self by inducing autoantibody formation, as is found with α methyldopa-induced autoimmune hemolytic anaemia22 rather than by mechanisms of drug adsorption or by the formation of trimolecular complexes of drug, antibody, and cell membrane.
Case . | Serum . | Purified IgG . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Native sample . | Gold (μg/mL)* . | Native sample . | Gold (μg/mL) . | |||||
0.1 . | 1 . | 10 . | 0.1 . | 1 . | 10 . | |||
Control† | 0.01‡ | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.12 |
2 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 0.49 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 0.39 |
3 | 1.39 | 1.14 | 1.93 | 1.04 | 0.46 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.23 |
4 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.17 |
7 | 0.33 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.53 |
8 | 1.12 | 0.95 | 1.02 | 0.97 | 1.74 | 1.40 | 1.45 | 1.32 |
Case . | Serum . | Purified IgG . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Native sample . | Gold (μg/mL)* . | Native sample . | Gold (μg/mL) . | |||||
0.1 . | 1 . | 10 . | 0.1 . | 1 . | 10 . | |||
Control† | 0.01‡ | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.12 |
2 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 0.49 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 0.39 |
3 | 1.39 | 1.14 | 1.93 | 1.04 | 0.46 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.23 |
4 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.17 |
7 | 0.33 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.53 |
8 | 1.12 | 0.95 | 1.02 | 0.97 | 1.74 | 1.40 | 1.45 | 1.32 |
Native samples are samples without gold added.
Final concentration of gold during all stages of MAIPA. For clarity, results using 100 μg/mL are not shown.
Negative control AB serum or IgG fraction from AB serum.
ELISA OD values. Results are from a representative experiment, derived from duplicate testing against platelets from 2 donors.
That gold is not required for autoantibody binding agrees with earlier studies using eluted autoantibodies.23 However, our specificity results are not in agreement with a previous suggestion that autoantibodies in gold-induced AITP are against GPIIb-IIIa.23 This latter conclusion was inferred from the lack of reactivity with platelets from patients with Glanzmann thrombasthenia rather than from positive test results.
To investigate whether the epitopes recognized by autoantibodies are uniquely expressed on GPV, sera from patients 6, 7, 8, and 9 were tested using ELISA with fibroblasts expressing human GPV. All sera gave positive results, and OD values were 0.31, 0.27, 0.25, and 0.37, respectively, compared with a value of 0.03 with the negative control. This reactivity demonstrates that the epitopes are confined to GPV and are not dependent on the presence of GPIbα, GPIbβ, or GPIX.
All but one of the 28 negative control RA patients without thrombocytopenia (platelet counts 153 × 109/L or higher; range, 153-582 × 109/L; mean, 285 × 109/L) had a negative direct PAIgG test. The single positive patient had a platelet count of 329 × 109/L, and the PAIgG result was 2.9 times that of the negative control. There was insufficient sample for further investigation of the PAIgG, but indirect testing showed a weak alloantibody of undetermined specificity.
In summary, we obtained significant evidence that in gold-associated AITP, autoantibodies recognize GPV. Cloning of these autoantibodies is required to determine whether the loss of tolerance is for single or multiple epitopes and whether the same epitopes are targeted in the different clinical groups. Such recombinant mAbs would also be ideal tools for investigating the functional effects of GPV-specific antibodies because it has recently been suggested that they may affect collagen-induced platelet aggregation.24
We thank Professor A. E. G. Kr von dem Borne and Dr L. Porcelijn for their gifts of the CLB mAbs and for referring patient 10, respectively. We also thank Dr Peter Smethurst for the IgG purification, the staff at the Platelet Immunology Reference Laboratory at the National Blood Service East Anglia Centre for their expertise in serology, and Dr John Williams for reviewing the rheumatoid arthritis cases.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
References
Author notes
Stephen F. Garner, National Blood Service East Anglia Centre and Division of Transfusion Medicine, University of Cambridge, Long Rd, Cambridge, CB2 2PT, United Kingdom; e-mail:sfg21@cam.ac.uk.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal