Abstract
Background: In a double-blind randomized trial of empirical antifungal Rx for persistently febrile neutropenic pts, CAS was as effective as and better tolerated than L-AmB. We now examine the results of this study in the subgroup of pts with AML.
Methods: Randomization to CAS (70 mg x 1, then 50 mg/d) or L-AmB (3 mg/kg/d) was stratified by risk category [high risk = allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant or relapsed acute leukemia] and use of antifungal prophylaxis. The primary efficacy endpoint was % of treated pts with documented fever and neutropenia who had a successful outcome defined by all the following: successful Rx of baseline (BL) invasive fungal infection (IFI) (if any), no breakthrough (BT) IFI to 7 d post-Rx, survival @7d post-Rx, no premature discontinuation (DC) due to lack of efficacy or study drug toxicity, and fever resolution x 48 hr during neutropenia.
Results: 703/1095 (64%) of the treated pts had AML, including 364/556 (65%) and 339/539 (63%) in the CAS and L-AmB groups, respectively. Demographic characteristics were similar in AML pts in both Rx groups. 27% of CAS and 22% of L-AmB pts with AML were high risk. Median days of Rx were: CAS, 12; L-AmB, 11. The table shows % AML pts with a successful outcome by Rx group.
% AML pts with a successful outcome by Rx group
. | CAS (N=364) . | L-AmB (N=339) . | Difference (CAS - L-AmB) . | 95% CI for difference between treatment groups . |
---|---|---|---|---|
† 7/14 CAS and 5/16 L-AmB pts had successful Rx of BL IFI. | ||||
Success Rx of BL IFI † | 50 | 31 | 19 | (−16, 53) |
No BT IFI | 93 | 95 | −2 | (−5, 2) |
Suvival @ 7d post-Rx | 92 | 88 | 4 | (0, 8) |
No premature DC | 87 | 86 | 2 | (−3, 7) |
Fever resolution | 48 | 46 | 2 | (−5, 9) |
All of the above | 40 | 38 | 2 | (−5, 10) |
. | CAS (N=364) . | L-AmB (N=339) . | Difference (CAS - L-AmB) . | 95% CI for difference between treatment groups . |
---|---|---|---|---|
† 7/14 CAS and 5/16 L-AmB pts had successful Rx of BL IFI. | ||||
Success Rx of BL IFI † | 50 | 31 | 19 | (−16, 53) |
No BT IFI | 93 | 95 | −2 | (−5, 2) |
Suvival @ 7d post-Rx | 92 | 88 | 4 | (0, 8) |
No premature DC | 87 | 86 | 2 | (−3, 7) |
Fever resolution | 48 | 46 | 2 | (−5, 9) |
All of the above | 40 | 38 | 2 | (−5, 10) |
The composite success rates for the high risk AML pts were 46/99 (46%) for CAS and 31/76 (41%) for L-AmB.
Conclusions: In this post hoc subgroup analysis, CAS provided an effective and generally well-tolerated option for the empirical Rx of persistently febrile neutropenic pts with AML.
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal