Abstract
Rituximab has been given following autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for recurrent or refractory B cell lymphoma with the goal of eradicating minimal residual disease. Our recent study showed that this is a feasible strategy although transient grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 51% of patients (Blood 103:777, 2004). We also reported that two IgG Fc receptor (FcγR) polymorphisms, FcγRIIIa 158 V/V and FcγRIIa 131 H/H genotypes, predict response to rituximab therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma, probably due to their role in the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) (JCO 21:3940, 2003). In the current report, we correlated FcγR polymorphisms with clinical outcomes after post-transplant rituximab. A total of 35 patients with diffuse large cell (25 patients), mantle cell (3 patients), transformed (3 patients) or other (4 patients) subtypes of B cell lymphoma received high-dose therapy, autologous HCT and rituximab, administrated as 4-weekly infusions (375 mg/m2) starting around day 42 and 6 months after HCT. Genomic DNA was available for FcγR polymorphism analysis in 33 cases. For the FcγRIIIa polymorphism, 4 (12%) patients were homozygous valine/valine (158 V/V), 14 (42%) patients were heterozygous valine/phenylalanine (158 V/F) and 15 (46%) patients were homozygous phenylalanine/phenylalanine (158 F/F). For the FcγRIIa polymorphism, 8 (24%) patients were homozygous histidine/histidine (131 H/H), 16 (49%) patients were heterozygous histidine/arginine (131 H/R) and 9 (27%) patients were homozygous arginine/arginine (131 R/R). We did not find a correlation of either the FcγRIIIa V/F polymorphism or the FcγRIIa H/R polymorphism with time to relapse after HCT. But the small number of relapses limited our power. Although rituximab infusions were well tolerated in this group of patients, 32% of the treatment courses in this study were associated with rituximab-induced grade 3 or grade 4 neutropenia (ANC < 1000/μl), which was recorded in 51% of patients. These neutropenic episodes were not associated with infection and responded well to G-CSF treatment. The reason for this high incidence of rituximab-induced neutropenia is unclear. Among the 33 patients analyzed for FcγR polymorphisms, FcγRIIIa 158 V/V homozygotes experienced relatively greater neutropenia (V/V : 3/4, 75%; V/F: 8/14, 57%; F/F: 5/15, 33%). For the 57 treatment courses, the FcγRIIIa 158 V/V genotype was associated with a greater chance of rituximab-induced neutropenia, compared to F carriers (158 V/F and 158 F/F). The incidence of rituximab-induced neutropenia was 71% for V/V, 39% for V/F, 19% for F/F and 28% for F carriers (V/V vs F carriers, p = 0.035). In contrast, the FcγRIIa H/R polymorphism had no impact on rituximab-induced neutropenia. Although the mechanism of rituximab-induced neutropenia is unknown, this report implicates an FcγR-mediated process, such as ADCC. It is possible that B cell depletion by rituximab affects either directly or indirectly cytokine (e.g. G-CSF) production as a mechanism for neutropenia. It will be of great interest to study the correlation between FcγR polymorphisms and the prevalence and duration of B cell depletion after rituximab therapy in larger clinical studies both after HCT and in conjunction with other myelosupressive therapies.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal