Abstract
Aims: Interim analysis of the safety and efficacy of a risk-adjusted approach to lymphoma salvage therapy. Methods: Patients were stratified - Group 1 (G1) (good risk - first relapse following durable CR1); Group 2 (G2) (poor risk - primary refractory, >1 relapse, or non-durable CR1); or Group 3 (G3) (relapse post-ASCT). Two regimens were evaluated: VGF (vinorelbine 25mg/sqm days 1 and 8, gemcitabine 1000mg/sqm days 1 and 8, pegfilgrastim 6mg SC day 9) (G1/3) and F-GIV (VGF plus ifosfamide 3000mg/sqm day 1) (G2). Following 2 cycles all patients were re-staged. Responsive patients (>50% reduction in disease and functional imaging negative) received 2 further cycles of the same therapy, the remainder ‘escalated’ therapy to F-GIV (G1/3) or IVAC (G2) (inpatient ifosfamide, VP-16 and Ara-C). Results: 45 of a planned 90 patients, median age 56 years, are evaluable (G1 = 16, G2 = 23, G3 = 6). Diagnoses were Hodgkin’s lymphoma n = 9 and NHL, n = 36 (DLC = 24, follicular = 6, others = 6). To date G1 and G2 have received 127 cycles of VGF or F-GIV, with grades 3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia in 31% and 17% (VGF) and 74% and 78% (F-GIV) of patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia, admission, treatment delay or dose-reductions occurred with 13%, 28%, 12%, 6% of cycles, respectively. Based on ITT the ORR is 59% (CR 33%). Conclusion: VGF and F-GIV can be safely administered on an outpatient basis and show significant activity against advanced lymphoma.
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal