Abstract
HAART has improved the outcome of AIDS patients (pts). Thus high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT has been used for the treatment of HIV+Ly pts, similarly to HIV-neg-Ly pts. In a recent report we found delayed engraftment after ASCT in HIV+Ly compared with HIV-neg Ly pts (
Exp.Hem 33;487–494,2005
). To test the role played by HAART on engrafment we conducted this study, comparing engraftment results on HIV+Ly pts that received HAART with those in wich HAART was withdrawn after ASCT. Patients and Methods: From June 2000 a total of 19 HIV+Ly pts (17 male) received an ASCT in a multicenter cooperative study; 5 were Hodgkin disease (HD) and 14 non-Hodgkin high-grade malignant lymphoma (NHL). Median age was 43 years (range, 31–61); adjusted IPI (aIPI) was: 0–1 in ten pts and 2–3 in nine more pts; advanced Ann Arbor stage (III–IV) was present in 14 pts.Ten pts were treated with HAART during ASCT (HAART+) and in nine pts HAART was withdrawn due to gastrointestinal toxicity (HAART neg). Both groups were similar for the most relevant clinical characteristics (p value Mann-Whitney test or chi-square test > 0.05): HD/NHL, Ann Arbor stage, aIPI, status at ASCT (CR-1/more than CR-1), age, number of lines of chemotherapy before ASCT, number of cycles of mobilization to obtain an adequate amount of CD34+ cells, number of CD34+ cells infused, day of start of GCSF and duration of GCSF-treatment. Results: Median time to reach PMN>0.5 x 109/L was 12 days (9–17) for HAART neg group and 18 days (9–33) for HAART+ pts (p=0.069). Platelet engraftment (>20x109/L) was achieved after a median of 20 days (11–28) and 26 days (11–455) respectively (p=0.25). Nevertheless, a multivariate regression analysis using as covariates HAART, GCSF (starting day) and amount of CD34+ cells infused, was performed. Accordingly no statisticaly significant results were found to relate with myeloid engraftment. Conclusions: Despite the HAART+ group shows longer interval to reach PMN and platelets engraftment following ASCT, we can not definitively conclude that HAART plays a negative influence on engraftment in this clinical setting. In order to clarify these results further recruitment of patients is needed.Author notes
Corresponding author
2005, The American Society of Hematology
2005
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal