In our series of consecutive patients (p) with objectively diagnosed VTE, cancer constitutes the most frequent ethiology (25%) followed by idiopathic (24%), clinical causes (22%), orthopedics and trauma (16%), general surgery (7%), obstetric entities (3%) and others (3%). Among the neoplastic subtypes, HM are the most prevalent ones followed by prostatic, colonic, lung and CNS cancers. A recent publication (

Blom et al, JAMA 2005; 293:715
) shows this previously undisclosed high tendency of HM for provoking VTE. Our current study describes the experience with this association from 1996 to 2005, excluding central vein catheter thrombosis. Out of 531 p with VTE, 138 have cancer and 34 of them, HM, with the following distribution: plasma cells discrasias (PCD) 9 (4 on treatment with thalidomide), diffuse large cell lymphomas (DLCL) 8, indolent lymphomas (IL) 6, CLL 5, mantle cell lymphoma 1, Burkitt lymphoma 1, RAEB 1, AML 1, myelofibrosis 1, P vera 1. In 25/34 p, the HM was previously known at diagnosis of VTE and mostly active or on treatment. In the other 9 p, the clinical presentation was as an idiopathic VTE, and during follow-up the following HM were disclosed: PCD: 3, CLL: 2, DLCL: 1, IL: 1, myelofibrosis: 1, RAEB: 1. Table 1

Comments:

  1. PCD and DLCL constitute the two HM more frequently associated with VTE. However, the contribution of less agressive neoplasms such as indolent lymphomas and CLL is not negligible

  2. As in solid tumors, recurrences are high, specially when anticoagulated patients are off-therapy

  3. In spite of more chemotherapy related-thrombocytopenia and bone marrow involvement, bleeding rates do not differ of those observed in solid tumors

  4. Given the frequent association with VTE, and the probable heterogeneity in the thrombophilic potency of these different entities collectively grouped as HM, prospective multicentric studies are clearly needed to identify groups of patients with HM suitable for primary prophylaxis of VTE.

  5. Such studies should also be designed to provide further clue about the use of LMWH instead of oral anticoagulants for secondary prophylaxis in HM.

Table 1.

Main clinical findings in patients able to be evaluated during follow-up

EventsHematologic MalignanciesSolid Neoplasms
Recurrences 6/28 (21.4%) 5 off anticoagulation 15/106 (14.1%) 7 off anticoagulation (p=ns) 
Major bleeding 2/28 (7.1%) 10/106 (9.4%) (p=ns) 
EventsHematologic MalignanciesSolid Neoplasms
Recurrences 6/28 (21.4%) 5 off anticoagulation 15/106 (14.1%) 7 off anticoagulation (p=ns) 
Major bleeding 2/28 (7.1%) 10/106 (9.4%) (p=ns) 
View Large

Topics:
burkitt's lymphoma, hematologic neoplasms, venous thromboembolism, cancer, solid tumors, anticoagulation, follow-up, myelofibrosis, non-hodgkin's lymphoma, indolent, refractory anemia with excess blasts

Author notes

Corresponding author

2005, The American Society of Hematology
2005
Sign in via your Institution