Abstract
The impact of allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) in comparison to conventional chemotherapy (CCT) in AML on quality of life remains unclear mainly due to a lack of studies with long term follow-up. Therefore the German AML-Intergroup initiated a survey on quality of life for patients treated within 1 of 8 German prospective multicenter treatment trials. All patients completed a self-report questionnaire either when they returned for follow-up outpatient visits or by mail. Patients completed the EORTC Quality of Life-Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) supplemented by self-assessed concomitant diseases, late treatment effects and demographic details including percentage of disability. 525 patients (median age: 46 years at diagnosis; median follow up period: 9 years) returned their questionnaires, 244 after SCT in 1. CR (189 allo; 55 auto) and 281 after CCT. Recovery-rate of the questionnaires was 55% ranging from 40% to 79% in the different trial cohorts. Due to low numbers after auto-SCT these patients were excluded from further analysis. The ECOG activity index revealed normal activity in 40% and 58% and disabled person card in 63% and 37% of the patients in the allo-SCT and CCT groups, respectively. Impaired vision, cataract surgery, chronic skin disorders and treatment of hormonal disorders were reported significantly more often in allo-SCT-patients, whereas osteoarthritis, cardiac insufficiency and unspecific back pain were slightly more frequent in CCT patients, mainly due to a higher median age in the CCT-group. All QLQC-30 functions except physical functioning and pain were in favor of CCT (p<0.001 in each variable). Problems in leisure-time activity, evenness and social life (friends and family) as well as financial management were significantly more frequent in patients after Allo-SCT than in patients after CCT, whereas the general assessment of positive attitude in life showed no difference between the two groups (62% CCT and 64% Allo-SCT). Multivariate logistic regression models on global health status and fatigue were performed. Actually concomitant disease (odds ratio 6.68 95%-CI 3.83–11.66), age > 45 years (odds-ratio 2.57 95%-CI 1.47–4.50) and Allo-SCT (odds ratio 2.10 95%-CI 1.20 – 3.69) showed significant adverse effect on global health status. Similarly unfavorable effects were evaluated for actually concomitant disease and Allo-SCT on fatigue. These results indicate that Allo-SCT compared to intensive chemotherapy had a significant negative impact on quality of life and this needs to be considered when reviewing treatment options.
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal