Abstract
Allograft T cell depletion (TCD) reduces acute graft-vs. host disease (aGVHD) after myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Lower incidences of aGVHD reported after reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation (RIST) may reflect delayed donor T cell engraftment. We compared the incidence of aGVHD following RIST with TCD (19 patients (pts) vs. T cell replete (TCR) allografts (20 pts)(Table). There was no difference in the incidence aGVHD, occurring in 71% of TCD recipients (median onset Day 47) and 70% of TCR recipients (median onset Day 25). After TCD, 100% of those who engrafted prior to any DLI developed aGVHD compared with 56% of those who engrafted after DLI, including two pts who developed “late-acute” aGVHD after Day 100, upon completion of donor T cell engraftment. T cell engraftment after TCD was uneven: engraftment kinetics were associated with residual host circulating CD8+ T cell counts after immune depletion; and aGVHD did not occur in the setting of mixed T cell chimerism (Figure). These observations demonstrate that aGVHD can occur with very low doses (105/kg) of allograft T cells after RIST. Protection from aGVHD conferred by mixed T cell chimerism may be lost with full donor T cell engraftment. With limited donor T cell numbers, host T cells appear to determine kinetics of engraftment and of aGVHD after RIST. Figure:
Post-induction circulating CD8+ T cell counts in TCD recipients with delayed donor T cell engraftment.
After TCD, all subjects who developed aGVHD did so at or after the establishment of T cell full donor T cell chimerism, and occasionally prior to any DLI.
Shaded triangle represents the theoretical area in which values would fall if subjects developed aGVHD prior to complete donor T cell engraftment. Arrows: DLI.
Protocol . | TCD . | TCR . |
---|---|---|
Flu/Cy: Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide; EPOCH-F: Etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisone and fludarabine; FDC: Full donor chimerism. | ||
Median (range) | Median (range) | |
Recipient Age | 43 years (32 – 56) | 44 (19 – 67) |
CMV Risk | 14/19 | 16/20 |
Pretransplant Immune Depletion | Flu/Cy | EPOCH-F |
Conditioning Regimen | Flu/Cy | Flu/Cy |
Pre-conditioning Host Cell Counts: | ||
CD3 | 86 (1 – 701) | 140 (21 – 441) |
CD4, p=0.017 | 44 (1 – 156) | 71 (12 – 191) |
CD8 | 34 (0 – 555) | 55 (2 – 309) |
NK | 58 (0 – 376) | 88 (3 – 467) |
Day 0 CD3 Cell Count | 1 (1 – 6) | 5 (0 – 42) |
Allograft CD34+ cells/kg | 7.75 x 106 (5.1 – 12.9) | 7.68 x 106 (4.6–18.4) |
Allograft CD3+ cells/kg | 1.0 x 105 (preset) | 3.63 x 108 (1.5 – 8.3) |
Donor T cell engraftment | Day +70 (14 – 180) | 14 (14 – 100) |
Protocol . | TCD . | TCR . |
---|---|---|
Flu/Cy: Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide; EPOCH-F: Etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisone and fludarabine; FDC: Full donor chimerism. | ||
Median (range) | Median (range) | |
Recipient Age | 43 years (32 – 56) | 44 (19 – 67) |
CMV Risk | 14/19 | 16/20 |
Pretransplant Immune Depletion | Flu/Cy | EPOCH-F |
Conditioning Regimen | Flu/Cy | Flu/Cy |
Pre-conditioning Host Cell Counts: | ||
CD3 | 86 (1 – 701) | 140 (21 – 441) |
CD4, p=0.017 | 44 (1 – 156) | 71 (12 – 191) |
CD8 | 34 (0 – 555) | 55 (2 – 309) |
NK | 58 (0 – 376) | 88 (3 – 467) |
Day 0 CD3 Cell Count | 1 (1 – 6) | 5 (0 – 42) |
Allograft CD34+ cells/kg | 7.75 x 106 (5.1 – 12.9) | 7.68 x 106 (4.6–18.4) |
Allograft CD3+ cells/kg | 1.0 x 105 (preset) | 3.63 x 108 (1.5 – 8.3) |
Donor T cell engraftment | Day +70 (14 – 180) | 14 (14 – 100) |
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal