Abstract
Introduction: Rituximab plus chemotherapy has been proved to be the gold - standard in treating advanced follicular lymphoma. Here we report the 4-year-follow-up data of our phase III trial comparing MCP - chemotherapy vs rituximab + MCP both followed by interferon maintenance in advanced symptomatic follicular lymphoma.
Methods: Previously untreated patients with advanced stage (III + IV) symptomatic CD 20-positive indolent NHL and mantle cell lymphoma (n=358) were randomized to receive either MCP-chemotherapy (mitoxantrone 8 mg/m² d1+2, chlorambucil 3x3 mg/m² d 1–5, prednisolone 25 mg/m² d 1–5 x 8 q 4 weeks) or MCP + rituximab (375 mg/m² d −1).
Here we report the results of the ITT population of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) (grade 1+2), who represented the majority of patients and for whom the sample size primarily was calculated, so this is not a subgroup analysis. Study endpoints included overall and complete response rate (RR + CR), progression free survival (PFS), event free survival (EFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), overall survival (OS) and toxicities.
Results: with a median follow - up of nearly 4 years (47 months) we are able to provide relatively mature data. Concerning toxicities there was no striking difference, but there was a significantly increased risk to experience a CTC grade III or IV toxicity for leukocytes in the R-MCP arm, however this did not increase the risk of infections.
For the FL - ITT population the results are given in the table.
Conclusions: Concerning all end points rituximab plus MCP is significantly superior to MCP alone in the treatment of advanced follicular lymphoma. Special attention should be drawn to the fact, that after a median follow-up of 47 months we can demonstrate a clinically and statistically significant survival advantage for the immunochemotherapy.
. | R-MCP (n=105) . | MCP (n=96) . | p-value . |
---|---|---|---|
Response rate | 92,4% | 75% | .0004 |
Complete Response | 49,5% | 25% | .0009 |
PFS median | n.r. | 29 months | < .0001 |
PSF 4 years | 71% | 40% | |
EFS median | n.r. | 26 months | < .0001 |
EFS 4 years | 69% | 35,5% | |
TTNT median | n.r. | 29,4 months | .0002 |
OS median | n.r. | n.r. | .0096 |
OS 4 years | 87% | 74% |
. | R-MCP (n=105) . | MCP (n=96) . | p-value . |
---|---|---|---|
Response rate | 92,4% | 75% | .0004 |
Complete Response | 49,5% | 25% | .0009 |
PFS median | n.r. | 29 months | < .0001 |
PSF 4 years | 71% | 40% | |
EFS median | n.r. | 26 months | < .0001 |
EFS 4 years | 69% | 35,5% | |
TTNT median | n.r. | 29,4 months | .0002 |
OS median | n.r. | n.r. | .0096 |
OS 4 years | 87% | 74% |
Disclosures: The study was supported by Hoffmann-LaRoche, Germany.; For lectures by Hoffmann-LaRoche.; Member of speakers bureau of Hoffamnn-LaRoche.
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal