Abstract
Background: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic disorders, which can be difficult to diagnose based only on morphologic bone marrow examination. Karyotyping can be useful in diagnosing borderline cases. However, only 40% of patients with MDS have an abnormal karyotype. Flow cytometry(FCM) approaches have been described but not clearly defined in MDS due to use of different criteria. We devised a 10-parameter FCM panel, mainly including myeloid and erythroid maturation markers, to differentiate MDS marrows from normal marrows.
Design: Bone marrow from 91 patients with cytopenia(s) or anemia were included in the study(10/2005–7/2006). Cases were divided into 3 groups:
normal, not morphologically suspicious for MDS, 46 cases,
equivocal, morphologically suggestive but not diagnostic of MDS, 20 cases,
morphologically diagnostic of MDS, 25 cases.
10 FCM paremeters were performed and scored:
hypogranularity,
aberrant expression of CD56,
lack of CD10 expression,
decreased CD64 expression,
&
lack of CD13 or CD33 expression,
&
abnormal CD13/CD16 or CD16/CD11b pattern,
increase of CD 34 expression gating on all cells excluding erythrocytes,
decreased expression of CD71/Glycophorin gating on erythroid precursors. Karyotypings were analyzed.
Results:
and
(see Table 1 and 2).
Karyotyping were anlayzed in 86 cases.
Cytogenetic abnormalities were found in 2.2% (1/44) of normal group, 5.3% (1/19) of equivocal group and 34.8% (8/43) of MDS group. In MDS group 7 of 8 patients (87.5%) who had both morphologic and cytogenetic diagnosis of MDS were scored >=3 of 8 FCM parameters.
Conclusions: Study showed the 8-parameter FCM panel was more predictive of MDS than 10-parameters one. Both CD13/CD16 & CD16/CD11b patterns were considered to be non-specific. In 8-parameter panel, zero score tended to rule out MDS, while score >=3 suggested MDS. The most specific FCM parameters were hypogranularity, CD34, aberrant expression of CD56 or lack of CD10 expression by mature granulocytes. CD71/Glycophorin A might be useful in identifying dysplasia in erythroid lineage.
Parameters/Group . | Normal Group(A)(n=46) . | Equivocal Group(B)(n=20) . | MDS Group(C)(n=25) . | CHITEST(P value)(GRoup A vs C) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
* These two parameters were deleted in the 8-parameter panel due to their high frequency seen in normal group. | ||||
Hypogranularity | 4 (8.7%) | 6 (30%) | 18 (72%) | 0.0001 |
CD56 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (5%) | 6 (24%) | 0.0005 |
CD10 | 7 (15.2%) | 7 (35%) | 15 (60%) | 0.0001 |
CD64 | 6 (13.1%) | 2 (10%) | 6 (24%) | 0.2396 |
CD13 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (8.0%) | 0.0516 |
CD33 | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (10 %) | 0 (0%) | 0 |
CD13/CD16* | 23 (50.0%) | 7 (35%) | 21 (84%) | 0.0047 |
CD34 | 8 (17.4%) | 7 (35%) | 13 (52%) | 0.0026 |
CD71 | 2 (4.3%) | 5 (25%) | 12 (48%) | 0.0001 |
CD16/CD11b* | 27 (58.7%) | 8 (40%) | 22 (88%) | 0.0107 |
Parameters/Group . | Normal Group(A)(n=46) . | Equivocal Group(B)(n=20) . | MDS Group(C)(n=25) . | CHITEST(P value)(GRoup A vs C) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
* These two parameters were deleted in the 8-parameter panel due to their high frequency seen in normal group. | ||||
Hypogranularity | 4 (8.7%) | 6 (30%) | 18 (72%) | 0.0001 |
CD56 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (5%) | 6 (24%) | 0.0005 |
CD10 | 7 (15.2%) | 7 (35%) | 15 (60%) | 0.0001 |
CD64 | 6 (13.1%) | 2 (10%) | 6 (24%) | 0.2396 |
CD13 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (8.0%) | 0.0516 |
CD33 | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (10 %) | 0 (0%) | 0 |
CD13/CD16* | 23 (50.0%) | 7 (35%) | 21 (84%) | 0.0047 |
CD34 | 8 (17.4%) | 7 (35%) | 13 (52%) | 0.0026 |
CD71 | 2 (4.3%) | 5 (25%) | 12 (48%) | 0.0001 |
CD16/CD11b* | 27 (58.7%) | 8 (40%) | 22 (88%) | 0.0107 |
Score/Group . | Normal Group (A)* (n=46) . | Equivocal Group (B)* (n=20) . | MDS Group (C)* (n=25) . |
---|---|---|---|
* Fish Exact T Test: Group A vs C: p<0.0001, A vs B: p=0.0006, B vs C: p=<0.0001 | |||
Score=0 | 21 (45.7%) | 3 (15%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Score=1–2 | 25 (543 %) | 14 (70%) | 8 (32 %) |
Score>3 | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (15%) | 17 (68%) |
*Mean score +/− SD | 0.65+/−1.06 | 1.55+/−1.54 | 2.8+/−1.65 |
Score/Group . | Normal Group (A)* (n=46) . | Equivocal Group (B)* (n=20) . | MDS Group (C)* (n=25) . |
---|---|---|---|
* Fish Exact T Test: Group A vs C: p<0.0001, A vs B: p=0.0006, B vs C: p=<0.0001 | |||
Score=0 | 21 (45.7%) | 3 (15%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Score=1–2 | 25 (543 %) | 14 (70%) | 8 (32 %) |
Score>3 | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (15%) | 17 (68%) |
*Mean score +/− SD | 0.65+/−1.06 | 1.55+/−1.54 | 2.8+/−1.65 |
Disclosure: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal