Abstract
Current recommendations for patients with CML (
Examination . | CML . | Ph+ALL . |
---|---|---|
Number of cytogenetic analyses per patient in the last 12 months, n (%) | N=1427 | N=42 |
0 | 447 (31.3) | 13 (31.0) |
1 | 559 (39.2) | 15 (35.7) |
2 | 271 (19.0) | 2 (4.8) |
≥3 | 150 (10.5) | 12 (28.6) |
≥1 fluorescent in situ hybridization since diagnosis, n (%) | N=1497 | N=45 |
No | 852 (56.9) | 18 (40.0) |
Yes | 645 (43.1) | 27 (60.0) |
≥1 PCR in the last 12 months, n (%) | N=1504 | N=48 |
No | 149 (9.9) | 2 (4.2) |
Yes | 1355 (90.1) | 46 (95.8) |
Patients with 4 PCRs in the last 12 months, n (%) | N=1422 | N=40 |
200 (14.1) | 4 (10.0) |
Examination . | CML . | Ph+ALL . |
---|---|---|
Number of cytogenetic analyses per patient in the last 12 months, n (%) | N=1427 | N=42 |
0 | 447 (31.3) | 13 (31.0) |
1 | 559 (39.2) | 15 (35.7) |
2 | 271 (19.0) | 2 (4.8) |
≥3 | 150 (10.5) | 12 (28.6) |
≥1 fluorescent in situ hybridization since diagnosis, n (%) | N=1497 | N=45 |
No | 852 (56.9) | 18 (40.0) |
Yes | 645 (43.1) | 27 (60.0) |
≥1 PCR in the last 12 months, n (%) | N=1504 | N=48 |
No | 149 (9.9) | 2 (4.2) |
Yes | 1355 (90.1) | 46 (95.8) |
Patients with 4 PCRs in the last 12 months, n (%) | N=1422 | N=40 |
200 (14.1) | 4 (10.0) |
Number of mutational analyses since diagnosis in imatinib-resistant patients, n (%) . | Imatinib-resistant patients . | |
---|---|---|
. | CML (N=209) . | Ph+ALL (N=6) . |
0 | 120 (57.4) | 3 (50.0) |
1 | 75 (35.8) | 3 (50.0) |
2 | 12 (5.7) | 0 |
≥3 | 2 (1.0) | 0 |
Number of mutational analyses since diagnosis in imatinib-resistant patients, n (%) . | Imatinib-resistant patients . | |
---|---|---|
. | CML (N=209) . | Ph+ALL (N=6) . |
0 | 120 (57.4) | 3 (50.0) |
1 | 75 (35.8) | 3 (50.0) |
2 | 12 (5.7) | 0 |
≥3 | 2 (1.0) | 0 |
This large European observational study suggests different methods of disease monitoring are used less often in real life than according to recommendations. Further research into the consequences of suboptimal monitoring of patients’ disease status is warranted.
Author notes
Disclosure:Employment: Cosimo Paga, Carine Cohen, Isidro Villanueva, Veronique Halkin, Michele Intorcia, and Karin Cerri are all employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Consultancy: David Marin Costa has acted as a consultant for Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Ownership Interests: Cosimo Paga has ownership interests in a start-up company.; Cosimo Paga and Karin Cerri have ownership interests in a publicly traded company. Veronique Halkin has stock options in Bristol-Myers Squibb. Research Funding: Each Principal Investigator received funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb for the coordination of the UNIC study in their country. Juan Steegmann has received other research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb. David Marin Costa and Gert Ossenkoppele have received research funding from Novartis. Honoraria Information: Juan Steegmann has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis and Roche for chairing conferences, advisory board activities and giving lectures. Gert Ossenkoppele has received honoraria from Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb for advisory board activities and lectures.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal