Abstract
Background: Approximately 20% of patients suffering a ST segment elevated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have progressive peri-infarct zone myocardial cell death causing ventricular remodeling and poor cardiac outcomes in spite of large vessel revascularization and medical management. Neo-angiogenesis occurs when VEGF levels peak and endothelial precursors are mobilized and recruited to the infarct site. Stromal cell derived factor-1 (SDF-1), the ligand for the CXCR4 receptor, is expressed by CD34+ cells and plays a role in cell homing to areas of ischemic damage. CD34+ CXCR4+ cells home to areas of ischemia, rich in SDF-1, including infarcted myocardium and are capable of inducing neo-angiogenesis. Natural neoangiogenesis is present but insufficient following AMI, suggesting that direct administration of CD34+ CXCR4+ progenitors could mitigate peri-infarct zone myocardial cell death and improve ventricular function.
Methods: In this phase I study, patients with an ST segment (AMI) are enrolled in cohorts of 5 to receive one of four doses (5, 10, 15, 20 x 106 of bone marrow derived CD34+ cells. Cells are harvested using a mini-bone marrow harvest (MMH) technique, acquired by Isolex selection and administered by infusion via the infarct related artery 5 to 10 day following successful coronary artery stenting post AMI. The first 10 subjects accrued as subjects on this phase 1 study included 9 males and 1 female, with a median age of 52 years (range 36–70).
Results: The first ten patients (of 20 planned) underwent a MMH under conscious sedation without incident. Adequate numbers of viable, enriched CD34+ cells were obtained following Isolex selection for treatment of subjects enrolled at the first two dose cohorts (5 x 106 and 10 x 106 CD34+ cells). The mean fraction of cells expressing CD34 in the marrow product was 0.75%, with a mean recovery of 40% following Isolex selection (Table).
Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of collecting up to 409 ml of bone marrow using a MMH technique in the immediate post AMI setting, with yields up to 86 x 106 CD34+ cells. All patient cells expressed CXCR4 and had in vitro migratory capacity. However the lower than expected percentage of TNC expressing CD34 (compared with 9 healthy age matched individuals (1.49% vs. 0.75%) and a low % recovery following Isolex selection may limit successful upper (>10 x 106) cohort treatments. VEGf-2 expression on enriched CD34+ cells was variable.
. | mean (median) . | range . |
---|---|---|
*N=7 (technical loss of 3 samples);** N=9 (technical loss of 1 sample) | ||
MMH marrow volume (ml) | 395 (396) | 377 – 409 |
Harvest TNC content (x 109) | 6.65 ( 6.73) | 3.85 – 8.59 |
Harvest CD34+ content (x 106) | 45.3 (50.2) | 16.9 – 86.7 |
Harvest CD34+ % of TNC | 0.75% (0.72%) | 0.54% – 1.06% |
Selected CD34+ content (x 106) | 17.8 (16.5) | 8.4 – 28.9 |
Selected % CD34+ recovery | 40.3% (41.9%) | 30.2 – 49.7 |
Selected %CD34+ viability | 97.1% (98.0 %) | 96% – 99% |
Selected % CD34+ purity | 82.5% (84.%) | 70% – 91% |
Total processing time (hours) | 14.2 (14.0) | 11 – 17 |
SDF-1 induced migration (% of CD34+ cells) | 20.2% (17.0%) | 9.5% – 35.4% |
CXCR-4 expression(% of CD34+ cells)* | 58.7% (52.0%) | 44% – 78% |
VEGF-2 expression (% of CD34+ cells)** | 0.82% (0.86%) | 0% – 2.39% |
. | mean (median) . | range . |
---|---|---|
*N=7 (technical loss of 3 samples);** N=9 (technical loss of 1 sample) | ||
MMH marrow volume (ml) | 395 (396) | 377 – 409 |
Harvest TNC content (x 109) | 6.65 ( 6.73) | 3.85 – 8.59 |
Harvest CD34+ content (x 106) | 45.3 (50.2) | 16.9 – 86.7 |
Harvest CD34+ % of TNC | 0.75% (0.72%) | 0.54% – 1.06% |
Selected CD34+ content (x 106) | 17.8 (16.5) | 8.4 – 28.9 |
Selected % CD34+ recovery | 40.3% (41.9%) | 30.2 – 49.7 |
Selected %CD34+ viability | 97.1% (98.0 %) | 96% – 99% |
Selected % CD34+ purity | 82.5% (84.%) | 70% – 91% |
Total processing time (hours) | 14.2 (14.0) | 11 – 17 |
SDF-1 induced migration (% of CD34+ cells) | 20.2% (17.0%) | 9.5% – 35.4% |
CXCR-4 expression(% of CD34+ cells)* | 58.7% (52.0%) | 44% – 78% |
VEGF-2 expression (% of CD34+ cells)** | 0.82% (0.86%) | 0% – 2.39% |
Author notes
Disclosure:Employment: Dr. Moss is an employee of Progenitor Cell Therapy. Dr. Chan is an employee of Amorcye, the sponsor of this study. Consultancy: Drs. Waller and Quyumi are paid consultants to Amorycyte. Ownership Interests: Drs. Pecora and Preti are shareholders in Progenitor Cell Therapy and Amorcyte. Research Funding: Dr. Quyumi received research funding from Amorycyte. Membership Information: Drs. Waller and Quyumi are members of the Scientific Advisory Board of Amorcyte.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal