Abstract
Abstract 2939
Poster Board II-915
Peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at the time of diagnosis is a prognostic indicator in hematologic malignancies. However, no reports have addressed whether ALC at the time of first relapse (ALC-R) has a prognostic significance in the patients with relapsed T-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We retrospectively studied the prognostic significance of ALC-R in these patients.
We identified 63 patients who had a documented relapsed disease after having reached a complete response, including at least an unconfirmed complete response between 1993 and 2007 and we analyzed their ALC-R and following variables at the time of first relapse; age, gender, the number of extranodal sites, lactate dehydrogenase, ECOG performance status, stage and international prognostic index.
Out of the 63 patients, 23 (36.5%) had a peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise characterized, while 15 (23.8%) had an extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type, 6 (9.5%) anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, 5 (7.9%) angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, 2 (3.2%) primary cutaneous T cell lymphoma and 12 (19%) other types. Among them, 32 (50.8%) had an ALC-R ≥ 1.25 × 109/L, 47 (74.6%) had an ECOG PS 0 or 1 and by IPI at relapse, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were 20.6%, 25.4%, 23.8%, 23.8%, 4.8%, and 1.6%, respectively. Univariate analyses showed that good ECOG PS (HR, 0.408; 95% CI 0.190-0.876; p=0.022) and high ALC at relapse (HR, 0.394; 95% CI 0.210-0.740; p=0.004) were associated with longer survival from relapse (Table 1). Multivariate analysis also showed that high ALC at relapse (HR, 0.369; 95% CI 0.187-0.726; p=0.004) and good ECOG PS (HR, 0.295; 95% CI 0.131-0.666; p=0.003) were still associated with longer survival outcome (Table 2).
The high ALC-R predicted a better prognosis in patients with relapsed T-cell NHL, suggesting that the host immune system might have a crucial role.
Variables . | . | Hazard Ratio . | HR 95 % CI . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|
ALC-R | ≥1.25 × 109/L | 0.394 | 0.210-0.740 | 0.004 |
<1.25 × 109/L | 1 | |||
Age, years | >60 | 1.310 | 0.669-2.564 | 0.431 |
'60 | 1 | |||
Gender | women | 0.994 | 0.523-1.890 | 0.986 |
men | 1 | |||
the number of extranodal sites | >1 | 1.312 | 0.605-2.846 | 0.491 |
'1 | 1 | |||
LDH | abnormal | 1.545 | 0.813-2.937 | 0.184 |
normal | 1 | |||
ECOG PS | 0, 1 | 0.408 | 0.190-0.876 | 0.022 |
≥2 | ||||
stage | III, IV | 1.462 | 0.795-2.688 | 0.221 |
I, II | 1 | |||
IPI | ≥3 | 1.191 | 0.618-2.296 | 0.602 |
<3 | 1 |
Variables . | . | Hazard Ratio . | HR 95 % CI . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|
ALC-R | ≥1.25 × 109/L | 0.394 | 0.210-0.740 | 0.004 |
<1.25 × 109/L | 1 | |||
Age, years | >60 | 1.310 | 0.669-2.564 | 0.431 |
'60 | 1 | |||
Gender | women | 0.994 | 0.523-1.890 | 0.986 |
men | 1 | |||
the number of extranodal sites | >1 | 1.312 | 0.605-2.846 | 0.491 |
'1 | 1 | |||
LDH | abnormal | 1.545 | 0.813-2.937 | 0.184 |
normal | 1 | |||
ECOG PS | 0, 1 | 0.408 | 0.190-0.876 | 0.022 |
≥2 | ||||
stage | III, IV | 1.462 | 0.795-2.688 | 0.221 |
I, II | 1 | |||
IPI | ≥3 | 1.191 | 0.618-2.296 | 0.602 |
<3 | 1 |
Variables . | Hazard Ratio . | HR 95% CI . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|
High ALC-R (≥1.25 × 109/L) | 0.369 | 0.188-0.726 | 0.004 |
Good ECOG PS (0, 1) | 0.295 | 0.131-0.666 | 0.003 |
Variables . | Hazard Ratio . | HR 95% CI . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|
High ALC-R (≥1.25 × 109/L) | 0.369 | 0.188-0.726 | 0.004 |
Good ECOG PS (0, 1) | 0.295 | 0.131-0.666 | 0.003 |
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal