Abstract
Abstract 3230
Poster Board III-167
Pre-apheresis peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells of < 20 cells/μl is a significant risk factor for poor hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization and collection in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous HSC transplantation (auto-HSCT). PB CD34+ cells are routinely monitored to optimize the timing and success of HSC collection after mobilization with cytokines ± chemotherapy. This analysis was designed to compare the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF to placebo + G-CSF for mobilization in patients with MM who had pre-apheresis PB CD34+ cell counts < 20 cells/μl. We hypothesized that the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF would improve the stem cell yield in these patients with baseline CD34+ cells < 20 cells/μl.
Data were obtained from a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial that compared the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg/day SC) + G-CSF (10 μg/kg/day) to placebo + G-CSF for mobilization and auto-HSCT in patients with MM. PB CD34+ cell count was measured on Day 4, prior to first plerixafor/placebo dose, and on Day 5, 10-11 hours post study treatment. The proportion of patients achieving the minimal (≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) or optimal (≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) cell doses in 2 apheresis days, apheresis yields, and time to engraftment were compared between the plerixafor and placebo groups for PB CD34+ cell count <10 cells/μl (PB<10) and <20 cells/μl (PB<20).
In the plerixafor group (n=148), 27 (18%) and 56 (38%) patients had Day 4 PB CD34+ cells/μl <10 and <20 which was as expected identical to the 30 (19%) and 60 (39%) patients in the placebo group, respectively (n=154). Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Plerixafor + G-CSF resulted in a statistically significant increase in the absolute PB CD34+ cells/ml on Day 5 compared to placebo + G-CSF (p<0.001; Table 1). For patients with PB <10, the median fold increase in PB CD34+ cells in the plerixafor (n = 27) vs. placebo (n = 30) groups was 9.6 vs. 2 (p<0.001). Similarly, for patients with PB <20 the median fold increase in PB CD34+ cells in the plerixafor (n = 56) vs. placebo (n = 60) groups was 6.6 vs. 2 (p<0.001).The median CD34+ cell yield after 2 aphereses was significantly higher in the plerixafor vs. placebo group: 5.44 vs.1.68 × 106 cells/kg (p<0.001; PB<10) and 7.06 vs. 3.27 × 106 cells/kg (p<0.001; PB <20). The proportion of patients achieving ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 2 aphereses was significantly higher in the plerixafor group compared to the placebo group: 92.6% vs. 43.3 % in patients with PB<10 (p<0.001), and 94.6% vs. 66.7% in patients with PB<20 (p<0.001). Similarly, the proportion of patients achieving ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 2 apheresis days was significantly higher in the plerixafor vs. placebo group: 40.7% vs. 3.3 % in patients with PB<10 (p<0.001), and 55.4% vs. 15% in patients with PB<20 (p<0.001). The median time to platelet (19-20 days) and neutrophil (11 days) engraftment was similar in both groups.
These data demonstrate that in patients with MM who are predicted to fail mobilization based on low PB CD34+ cell count, the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF allows for 2-day collection of the minimal and optimal cell dose in a greater proportion of patients compared to G-CSF alone. Thus, addition of plerixafor to G-CSF can decrease the risk of poor mobilization in patients with MM who have PB CD34+ cell counts < 20 or even < 10 cells/μl.
. | Plerixafor + G-CSF n=148 . | Placebo + G-CSF n=154 . | P-Value . |
---|---|---|---|
Number of Patients with Day 4 Absolute PB CD34+ cells/μl | |||
< 10 | 27 | 30 | - |
< 20 | 56 | 60 | - |
Day 5 Absolute PB CD34+ cells/μl* | |||
< 10 | 48.50 (4-314.6) | 11.61 (1.2- 27) | <0.001 |
< 20 | 66.00 (4-314.6) | 20.20 (1.2-55.8) | <0.001 |
Fold Increase in PB CD34+ cells/μl from Day 4 to Day 5*# | |||
< 10 | 9.6 (4-70.1) | 2.0 (0.4-5.5) | <0.001 |
< 20 | 6.6 (2.7-70.1) | 2.0 (0.4-5.5) | <0.001 |
Cumulative CD34+ cells/kg x 106 after 2 apheresis days* | |||
< 10 | 5.44 (0.63-25.81) | 1.68 (0.11-11.37) | <0.001 |
< 20 | 7.06 (0.63-25.81) | 3.27 (0.11-11.37) | <0.001 |
% Patients achieving ≥2 × 106 CD34+ Cells/Kg in 2 days | |||
< 10 | 92.6 | 43.3 | <0.001 |
< 20 | 94.6 | 66.7 | <0.001 |
% Patients achieving ≥6 × 106 CD34+ Cells/Kg in 2 days | |||
< 10 | 40.7 | 3.3 | <0.001 |
< 20 | 55.4 | 15.0 | <0.001 |
Days to Platelet Engraftment* | |||
< 10 | 20 (10-92) | 19 (1-95) | 0.370 |
< 20 | 20 (1-92) | 19 (1-95) | 0.153 |
Days to Neutrophil Engraftment* | |||
< 10 | 11 (10-22) | 11 (7-18) | 0.993 |
< 20 | 11 (2-22) | 11 (7-18) | 0.504 |
. | Plerixafor + G-CSF n=148 . | Placebo + G-CSF n=154 . | P-Value . |
---|---|---|---|
Number of Patients with Day 4 Absolute PB CD34+ cells/μl | |||
< 10 | 27 | 30 | - |
< 20 | 56 | 60 | - |
Day 5 Absolute PB CD34+ cells/μl* | |||
< 10 | 48.50 (4-314.6) | 11.61 (1.2- 27) | <0.001 |
< 20 | 66.00 (4-314.6) | 20.20 (1.2-55.8) | <0.001 |
Fold Increase in PB CD34+ cells/μl from Day 4 to Day 5*# | |||
< 10 | 9.6 (4-70.1) | 2.0 (0.4-5.5) | <0.001 |
< 20 | 6.6 (2.7-70.1) | 2.0 (0.4-5.5) | <0.001 |
Cumulative CD34+ cells/kg x 106 after 2 apheresis days* | |||
< 10 | 5.44 (0.63-25.81) | 1.68 (0.11-11.37) | <0.001 |
< 20 | 7.06 (0.63-25.81) | 3.27 (0.11-11.37) | <0.001 |
% Patients achieving ≥2 × 106 CD34+ Cells/Kg in 2 days | |||
< 10 | 92.6 | 43.3 | <0.001 |
< 20 | 94.6 | 66.7 | <0.001 |
% Patients achieving ≥6 × 106 CD34+ Cells/Kg in 2 days | |||
< 10 | 40.7 | 3.3 | <0.001 |
< 20 | 55.4 | 15.0 | <0.001 |
Days to Platelet Engraftment* | |||
< 10 | 20 (10-92) | 19 (1-95) | 0.370 |
< 20 | 20 (1-92) | 19 (1-95) | 0.153 |
Days to Neutrophil Engraftment* | |||
< 10 | 11 (10-22) | 11 (7-18) | 0.993 |
< 20 | 11 (2-22) | 11 (7-18) | 0.504 |
Values represent Median (Range)
Expressed as a ratio of the pre-G-CSF CD34+ cells/μL on Day 5 to pre-G-CSF CD34+ cells/μL on Day 4
Nademanee:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stadtmauer:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Micallef:Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stiff:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Calandra:Genzyme Corporation: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. DiPersio:Genzyme: Honoraria.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal