Abstract 3448

Poster Board III-336

Introduction

Patients (pts) with CLL have more than twice the risk of developing second malignancies [1]. Frontline therapy with FCR was the strongest independent determinant of survival when compared to FC in patients with CLL in retrospective analysis [2]. This study aims to identify pretreatment factors that may be associated with the development of 2nd malignancies in patients with CLL treated with FCR as initial therapy.

Methods

Our analysis includes pts with CLL treated between July 1999 and November 2003, on a Phase II trial of FCR as initial therapy. Patients who had developed a 2nd malignancy prior to initiation of therapy were excluded. Patients were divided in 2 groups according to whether they developed a 2nd malignancy during the follow up period. Time to 2nd malignancy was defined as the time from treatment to the first occurrence of 2nd malignancy. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected by metaphase karyotype of bone marrow leukemia cells. Patient characteristics, response to FCR, and overall survival were compared between the two groups using: Wilcoxon rank for continuous variables or Chi-square tests for categorical variables; Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate survival curves and log-rank test was used to assess differences in survival between subgroups. Responses were assessed by 1996 NCI-WG criteria after completion of treatment. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were fitted to assess the association between pts' characteristics and the second malignancy-free survival.

Results

Among 300 pts with CLL treated with frontline FCR, 46 had a 2nd cancer diagnosed prior to FCR were therefore excluded from this analysis, resulting in a total of 254 pts (85%). With a median follow-up of 76 months, 58 pts (23%) have developed a 2nd malignancy. These included hematological malignancies n=20, non-melanoma skin cancer n=18, solid tumors n=15 and 5 patients have more than 1 type of malignancy. Pts who developed a 2nd malignancy had significantly higher pretreatment percent of lymphocyte in the bone marrow (p=0.04), were less likely to have enlarged spleen size (p=0.024), and were more likely to have deletion of or abnormal chromosome 17 (p=0.008). The overall survival or the responses to treatment were not different between the 2 groups of pts. In the Cox proportional hazards model, abnormalities of chromosome 17 and 13 were statistically significantly associated with shorter time to 2nd malignancy: HR, 9.79 (95% CI, 2.84 - 33.82), p=0.0003 and HR, 4.019 (95% CI, 1.41 - 11.42), p=0.009, respectively.

Conclusion

Chromosome 17 and 13 abnormalities identified by standard metaphase karyotype analysis were more common in patients with CLL who develop 2nd malignancy after FCR therapy. The response rates and overall survival were not different between patients with CLL with or without 2nd malignancy after frontline therapy with FCR.

  1. Tsimberidou AM, Wen S, McLaughlin P, et al., J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):904-10.

  2. Tam CS, O'Brien S, Wierda W, et. al., Blood. 2008 Aug 15;112(4):975-80.

Univariate Cox proportional hazards model in estimating the associations between covariates and 2nd malignancy free survival.

PARAMETERNPHR95%CI of HR
Gender (M vs F) 244 0.457 1.273 0.673 2.407 
Age (>=60 vs <60) 244 0.326 1.334 0.751 2.368 
RAI (3-4 vs 0-2) 244 0.115 0.582 0.297 1.142 
B2M (>=4 vs <4) 242 0.548 0.834 0.461 1.508 
ALB (<=3.5 vs >3.5) 244 0.483 0.658 0.204 2.119 
Creatinine (>1.5 vs <=1.5) 244 0.262 1.799 0.645 5.022 
LDH (>2x vs <=2x) 243 0.55 0.823 0.436 1.556 
Hepatomegaly (yes vs no) 244 0.118 0.505 0.215 1.188 
Splenomegaly (yes vs no) 243 0.054 0.561 0.312 1.011 
Hgb (>=11 vs <11) 244 0.111 2.007 0.853 4.722 
PLT (>=100 vs <100) 244 0.668 1.181 0.553 2.524 
Absolute lymphocyte count (>=30 vs <30) 244 0.469 0.798 0.433 1.47 
CD19+38 (>=20 vs <20) 205 0.976 1.011 0.488 2.098 
ZAP70 (pos vs neg) 86 0.551 1.393 0.468 4.146 
17p (yes vs no) 186 0.0003 9.798 2.839 33.821 
11q(yes vs no) 186 0.732 0.779 0.187 3.248 
13q(yes vs no) 186 0.009 4.019 1.414 11.424 
DIP(yes vs no) 186 0.69 0.865 0.424 1.766 
PARAMETERNPHR95%CI of HR
Gender (M vs F) 244 0.457 1.273 0.673 2.407 
Age (>=60 vs <60) 244 0.326 1.334 0.751 2.368 
RAI (3-4 vs 0-2) 244 0.115 0.582 0.297 1.142 
B2M (>=4 vs <4) 242 0.548 0.834 0.461 1.508 
ALB (<=3.5 vs >3.5) 244 0.483 0.658 0.204 2.119 
Creatinine (>1.5 vs <=1.5) 244 0.262 1.799 0.645 5.022 
LDH (>2x vs <=2x) 243 0.55 0.823 0.436 1.556 
Hepatomegaly (yes vs no) 244 0.118 0.505 0.215 1.188 
Splenomegaly (yes vs no) 243 0.054 0.561 0.312 1.011 
Hgb (>=11 vs <11) 244 0.111 2.007 0.853 4.722 
PLT (>=100 vs <100) 244 0.668 1.181 0.553 2.524 
Absolute lymphocyte count (>=30 vs <30) 244 0.469 0.798 0.433 1.47 
CD19+38 (>=20 vs <20) 205 0.976 1.011 0.488 2.098 
ZAP70 (pos vs neg) 86 0.551 1.393 0.468 4.146 
17p (yes vs no) 186 0.0003 9.798 2.839 33.821 
11q(yes vs no) 186 0.732 0.779 0.187 3.248 
13q(yes vs no) 186 0.009 4.019 1.414 11.424 
DIP(yes vs no) 186 0.69 0.865 0.424 1.766 
Disclosures

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution