Abstract 2257

Background:

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) is an effective anti-tumor strategy in multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma patients. However, a significant proportion of patients cannot mobilize a sufficient number of CD34+cells to proceed to transplantation. Plerixafor addition to G-CSF significantly increases the proportion of lymphoma and MM patients, mobilizing ≥2×10106 /kg CD 34+ cells, considered the minimum dose safe for ASCT; however there are very few data about the use of Plerixafor after mobilizing chemotherapy (CHT).

Patients and Methods:

We report here 39 MM or lymphoma patients, candidate for ASCT, who received Plerixafor to collect peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) after CHT, followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF); 17 were affected by non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 16 by MM and 6 by Hodgkin's Lymphoma; 21 were male and 18 female and the median age was 58 years (20-72). In this population the PBSC collection was planned after disease-specific chemotherapy, followed by G-CSF. These patients were considered poor mobilizers (PM), and therefore eligible for Plerixafor addition, according to the following criteria: ì-previous failure of at least one mobilization attempt (proved PM); ìì- presence of factors predicting unsuccessful harvest (predicted PM), such as: advanced disease, extensive Bone Marrow involvement, previous treatment with extensive radiotherapy or previous prolonged treatment with stem cell poisons (Fludarabine, Alkylating agents, Lenalidomide); ììì- CD34+ cells count <10 cells/μL in Peripheral Blood (PB), during the recovery phase after CHT plus G-CSF for at least 7 consecutive days (probable PM). All patients had advanced disease and the median number of previous CHT regimens was 2 (range:1-4); 24 failed at least one mobilization attempt (proven PM); 5 had been considered predicted PM, according to disease status and/or previous treatment; 10 patients have been considered “probable PM”, due to the persistently low CD34+ cell count after G-CSF for at least 7 consecutive days. Retrospectively only 10 out of the 39 mobilized patients reached a CD34+ cell count ≥10/mcl in PB, before receiving Plerixafor. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/Kg), was administered subcutaneously for up to 3 consecutive days (median 2 days; range: 1–3), while continuing G-CSF, 9–11 hours before the planned leukapheresis. G-CSF was administered starting 48–96 hrs after the end of the mobilizing CHT. In all cases the mobilizing CHT was part of a disease-specific protocol: 13 patients received high-intermediate-dose Cytoxan (3-7 g/m2), 13 DHAP, 5 high-dose VP16 (2 g/m2), 4 HyperC-VAD and 4 other CHT (Dexa-BEAM, DCEP, IVAC, High-dose ARA-C).

Results:

Plerixafor administration was safe and no significant adverse events were recorded. Following Plerixafor we observed a 3,3 median fold-increase (range 0–20) of the circulating CD34+ cells, (median CD34+ peak: 31; range: 0–202/mcl) as compared to the day before Plerixafor (median CD 34+ peak: 5; range 0–32/mcl). In 30/39 patients we collected ≥2×106 CD34+ cells/Kg (median 3.7×106 /kg; range 0–15) after 1–3 leukaphereses (median 2). Twenty-five patients have been transplanted with Plerixafor-mobilized PBSCs, 24 of them showing a rapid and durable hematological recovery. The median time to reach PMN recovery (PMN≥500/mcl) was 13 days (9-23); median days to reach unsupported Platelet count ≥20.000/mcl and ≥50.000/mcl were 15 (89-88) and 22 (15-180) respectively. At present 22 patients are alive and maintain stable engraftment after ASCT; 1 died before engraftment while 2 died of disease progression. Our results suggest that “on-demand” addition of Plerixafor to G-CSF after disease-oriented-CHT is safe and may allow a satisfactory harvest in lymphoma and MM patients, considered to be proven or predicted PM, but still eligible for ASCT.

Disclosures:

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution