Abstract 3439

Introduction:

The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for the management of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) have provisionally defined criteria for suboptimal and failure to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (Baccarani et al., J Clin Oncol. 27 (35):6041-51, 2009). We tested the significance of these definitions in 3 studies of dasatinib after imatinib failure.

Methods:

Data from 1150 treated patients (pts) included in the 3 studies [CA180-013 (n=387); dasatinib only arm of CA180-017 (n=101); CA180-034 (n=662)] were analyzed. For the purpose of this analysis, we modified the 2009 ELN recommendations to add an optimal response category as shown in Table 1.

Table 1:

Modified Definitions of the Response to Second-generation TKIs after Imatinib Failure in Chronic Phase

Evaluation Time, monthsOptimalSuboptimalFailureWarnings
CCyR and PCyR (Ph + < 36%) Minor CyR (Ph + 36% − 65%) No CyR (Ph + > 95%) Minimal CyR (Ph + 66% − 95%) 
CCyR (Ph+ 0%) PCyR (Ph+ 1% − 35%) Minimal CyR (Ph+ 66% − 95%) Minor CyR (Ph+ 36% − 65%) 
12 MMR Less than MMR Less than PCyR (Ph+ > 35%  
Evaluation Time, monthsOptimalSuboptimalFailureWarnings
CCyR and PCyR (Ph + < 36%) Minor CyR (Ph + 36% − 65%) No CyR (Ph + > 95%) Minimal CyR (Ph + 66% − 95%) 
CCyR (Ph+ 0%) PCyR (Ph+ 1% − 35%) Minimal CyR (Ph+ 66% − 95%) Minor CyR (Ph+ 36% − 65%) 
12 MMR Less than MMR Less than PCyR (Ph+ > 35%  

CyR = cytogenetic response; CCyR = complete cytogenetic response; PCyR = partial cytogenetic response; MMR = major molecular response.

Background:

The median age of the pts included in this analysis was 56 yrs (range, 18–85) and the median duration of CML in these pts was 58 months (range, 0.9–250.8). Thirty-eight percent of the pts had received imatinib at a dose > 600mg/day and 45% had been on imatinib therapy >3 yrs. Twenty-four percent of pts included in this analysis had demonstrated imatinib-intolerance. Thirty-five percent of pts had mutations before the start of dasatinib therapy (5% had T315l).

Results:

Rates of optimal response at 3, 6 and 12 months were 51%, 44% and 36%. Rates of suboptimal response at 3, 6 and 12 months were 7%, 16% and 27%. Rates of failure response at 3, 6 and 12 months were 29%, 34% and 37%. Rates of warning response at 3 and 6 months were 12% and 6%. The starting dose of dasatinib did not influence these response rates. The group defined as suboptimal at 12 months (of whom 52% had already achieved CCyR) had a higher probability of achieving CCyR within 2 yr (83%) compared to the groups defined as suboptimal at 6 months (69%) or 3 months (51%). This suboptimal group at 12 months also had a higher 2 yr progression-free survival (PFS) (92%) compared to the suboptimal groups at 6 months (82%) and 3 months (80%). The probability of achieving an MMR within 2 yr was slightly higher in pts defined as optimal at 6 months (80%) vs. those at 3 months (71%). However, the probability of achieving an MMR within 2 yr showed minimal change for the suboptimal (31-35%) or the failure (5%) response groups defined at 3, 6 and 12 months. The pts with a warnings response had a profile that was intermediate between suboptimal and failure response. Table 2 summarizes 2 yr outcomes based on response.

Table 2:

Two yr Outcomes According to the Response Criteria at 3, 6 and 12 months

Percent Probability of EventResponseMonths on Therapy
3612
Probability of CCyR within 2 yr Optimal 91% NA NA 
Suboptimal 51% 69% 83% 
Failure 9% 9% 10% 
Warning 26% 37% N/A 
Probability of MMR within 2 yr Optimal 71% 80% NA 
Suboptimal 31% 35% 34% 
Failure 5% 5% 5% 
Warning 11% 19% N/A 
2-yr PFSa Optimal 90% 95% 95% 
Suboptimal 80% 82% 92% 
Failure 67% 66% 75% 
Warning 67% 88% N/A 
2-yr OS Optimal 97% 98% 97% 
Suboptimal 93% 99% 100% 
Failure 88% 89% 94% 
Warning 93% 100% N/A 
Percent Probability of EventResponseMonths on Therapy
3612
Probability of CCyR within 2 yr Optimal 91% NA NA 
Suboptimal 51% 69% 83% 
Failure 9% 9% 10% 
Warning 26% 37% N/A 
Probability of MMR within 2 yr Optimal 71% 80% NA 
Suboptimal 31% 35% 34% 
Failure 5% 5% 5% 
Warning 11% 19% N/A 
2-yr PFSa Optimal 90% 95% 95% 
Suboptimal 80% 82% 92% 
Failure 67% 66% 75% 
Warning 67% 88% N/A 
2-yr OS Optimal 97% 98% 97% 
Suboptimal 93% 99% 100% 
Failure 88% 89% 94% 
Warning 93% 100% N/A 
a

PFS = freedom from accelerated/blast phase disease, loss of CHR or MCyR, >30% increase in Ph+ metaphases, increasing WBC, or death.

Conclusions:

These results suggest that the 2009 ELN provisional response definitions may be helpful in predicting long term outcomes in pts receiving second-line dasatinib therapy. In this cohort of pts, optimal responders identified themselves rapidly as did pts with failure. However, the outcome of pts defined as suboptimal at 12 months appeared more favorable than that of pts defined as suboptimal at 3 and 6 months. This, in addition to the higher proportion of pts classified as suboptimal at 12 months, compared to those classified as suboptimal at 3 and 6 months, may suggest that the ELN defined cut-off between optimal vs. suboptimal at 12 months (i.e. MMR) may need to be modified in order to make the prognosis for suboptimal response more consistent across different time points. Pts classified in the warnings category at 3 and 6 months had an outcome intermediate between those with suboptimal and failure response.

Disclosures:

Cortes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Shah:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. LeCoutre:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Kantarjian:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Jabbour:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Bahceci:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Chen:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Lambert:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Guilhot:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution