Introduction

Renal impairment (RI) in patients with MM is detrimental organ damage. The estimation of glomerular filtration (eGFR) rates is based on using different equations such as CKD-EPI, MDRD or Cockcroft-Gault (CG). Methods: We enrolled 132 consecutive MM patients treated with lenalidomide for the approved indication in our department between 2006 and 2012. The GFR for quantifying RI was estimated by the CKD-EPI, MDRD- and CG-equations at baseline and after 3 months under lenalidomide therapy. We assessed hematological response by the EBMT criteria, and renal response according to recently proposed criteria (Dimopolous et al. Leukemia 2013) and by comparing the CKD-EPI, MDRD- and CG equations.

Results

Median patient age was 64 years (range 41-90; males 62%) with predominantly advanced stage II/III Durie & Salmon and International Staging System disease (96% vs. 65%, respectively). Fifty-four MM patients had received ≥2 therapy lines and 50% prior stem cell transplantation. The median lenalidomide dose was 25mg (D1-21/28 day cycle) given with dexamethasone (Rd) as published. The median serum creatinine was normal at 1.0mg/dl, whereas the median eGFR showed CKD stage 2, with substantially different median CKD-EPI, MDRD and CG equations of 77, 81 and 74ml/min/1.73m2, respectively (Figure 1A). For each equation, the number of patients with CKD stage 3–5 via CKD-EPI, MDRD and CG equation was 32%, 23% and 30%, respectively (Table 1). In total, 26 (20%) MM patients with eGFR values by the MDRD equation were reclassified to higher CKD-stages according to CKD-EPI equation and 3 (2%) to lower CKD stages (Figure 1B). This demonstrates that the MDRD may substantially overestimate the GFR, especially in elderly patients with normal or less impaired renal function (GFR >60ml/min/1.73m2). Best overall response (ORR=CR+PR) and clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, SD) in this advanced, substantially pretreated cohort was 48% and 93%, respectively. After 3 months, renal response (CR, PR, MR) according to CKD-EPI, MDRD and CG were 17%, 11% and 15%, respectively, and renal response defined as any eGFR improvement was 52%, 51% and 51%, respectively. For each eGFR equation, the number of patients with renal improvement according to CKD stage 1-2 was more pronounced with the CKD-EPI (68% → 76%), less with the MDRD (77% → 83%) and least with the CG equation (70% → 75%; Table 1).

Table 1

Estimated CKD stages and prevalence of CKD stages 3-5 by different eGFR equations at baseline and after 3 months lenalidomide therapy

BaselineAfter 3 monthsBaselineAfter 3 monthsBaselineAfter 3 months
VariablesCKD-EPIMDRDCockcroft-Gault
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
CKD stage (ml/min/1.73m²)             
1: eGFR ≥90 35 (26) 68% 40 (33) 76% 46 (35) 77% 49 (41) 83% 49 (37) 70% 47 (39) 75% 
2: eGFR 89-60 55 (42) 51 (43) 56 (42) 50 (42) 43 (33) 43 (36) 
3: eGFR 59-30 33 (25) 32% 22 (18) 24% 21 (16) 23% 14 (12) 17% 32 (24) 30% 23 (19) 25% 
4: eGFR 29-15 7 (5) 6 (5) 8 (6) 7 (5) 7 (5) 5 (5) 
5: eGFR <15 2 (2) 1 (1) 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (1) 1 (1) 
             
BaselineAfter 3 monthsBaselineAfter 3 monthsBaselineAfter 3 months
VariablesCKD-EPIMDRDCockcroft-Gault
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
CKD stage (ml/min/1.73m²)             
1: eGFR ≥90 35 (26) 68% 40 (33) 76% 46 (35) 77% 49 (41) 83% 49 (37) 70% 47 (39) 75% 
2: eGFR 89-60 55 (42) 51 (43) 56 (42) 50 (42) 43 (33) 43 (36) 
3: eGFR 59-30 33 (25) 32% 22 (18) 24% 21 (16) 23% 14 (12) 17% 32 (24) 30% 23 (19) 25% 
4: eGFR 29-15 7 (5) 6 (5) 8 (6) 7 (5) 7 (5) 5 (5) 
5: eGFR <15 2 (2) 1 (1) 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (1) 1 (1) 
             
Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to demonstrate that measuring renal function by the CKD-EPI equation in Rd-treated MM patients is highly valuable. In these substantially pretreated MM patients, renal response under lenalidomide was seen via CKD-EPI in 17% and any eGFR improvements in 52%, indicating that Rd in these patients is effective and RI best defined via CKD-EPI. Our results enlarge the arsenal of available eGFR equations by the CKD-EPI formula.

Disclosures:

Kleber:Celgene: Educational grant Other. Engelhardt:Celgene: Educational grant Other.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution