In this issue of Blood, Stowell et al describe a novel mouse model of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) that recapitulates many of the key features of human disease.1  Recently, this same group of researchers described a transgenic mouse that expresses the human KEL2 (Chellano) red cell surface protein from the Kell system on red cells,2  and subsequently demonstrated that Kell differences on transfused blood induce antibody responses and hemolytic transfusion reactions similar to those seen in patients.3  In this latest report, Stowell et al1  demonstrate that similar to some patients, Kell differences between mother and father can lead to maternal antibody generation and hemolytic disease in utero. In so doing, they provide experimental confirmation of a long sought after animal model of HDFN.

A mouse model of HDFN that recapitulates human disease. (A) Breeding wild-type (WT) female mice with Kel2 transgenic male mice leads to HDFN. (B) HDFN depends on B-cell production of antibodies. (C) Transfusion of Kel2 transgenic blood into wild-type females also leads to HDFN. Professional illustration by Marie Dauenheimer.

A mouse model of HDFN that recapitulates human disease. (A) Breeding wild-type (WT) female mice with Kel2 transgenic male mice leads to HDFN. (B) HDFN depends on B-cell production of antibodies. (C) Transfusion of Kel2 transgenic blood into wild-type females also leads to HDFN. Professional illustration by Marie Dauenheimer.

Close modal

HDFN can be thought of as a clinically relevant natural experiment in human immunology, whereby allogenic paternal proteins expressed on red blood cells in the fetus are capable of elucidating a class switched, IgG alloantibody response in the mother.4  Exposure to red cell antigens typically occurs at the time of delivery, sparing the initial pregnancy. However, with subsequent pregnancies, transfer of maternal IgG to the developing fetus leads to antibody binding and destruction of developing fetal red blood cells. Alternatively, exposure of women of child-bearing age to paternal red cell antigens via transfusion can lead to antibody production capable of impacting even the first pregnancy. Classically, antibody titers and disease severity both increase with subsequent pregnancies; with lower titers associated with neonatal anemia and hyperbilirubinemia and higher titers associated with erhythroblastosis fetalis and interuterine death. Stowell et al1  convincingly demonstrate in their Kell-expressing transgenic mouse model that repeated exposure of Kell negative moms, via either multiple pregnancies or transfusion, leads to increasing anti-Kell antibody titers and worsening of HDFN of their offspring (see figure). By using mothers that are genetically incapable of antibody production, they definitively demonstrate that these antibodies drive the observed pathology (see figure).

Despite the initial description of HDFN in 1609 by a French midwife and the discovery of the antibody-mediated disease mechanism underlying it in the 1940s,4  our understanding of the basic immune mechanisms that govern induction of antibody responses in the relatively immunosuppressive environment of pregnancy remains unclear. The new Kell transgenic system described by Stowell et al1  provides an experimentally tractable model in which to address basic questions regarding the molecular mechanisms of initial immune sensitization. Perhaps more importantly, their work provides a clinically relevant model in which to investigate novel methods for prevention and treatment of HDFN going forward. Although polyclonal Rh(D) antisera (RhoGam) has proven tremendously successful in the prevention of the most common setting of HDFN driven by the Rh-D antigen, the mechanism of action of RhoGam remains a mystery.5  There are also many other RBC antigen systems capable of inducing severe HDFN for which there is no RhoGam equivalent, including the Kell, Kidd, and the non-D Rh antigens.6  In these non-D Rh mismatch settings, there is no proven prevention strategy and clinical management often requires interuterine transfusion strategies that themselves come with significant risk of fetal loss. Given its continued clinical importance, there have been several attempts throughout the years to generate animal models of HDFN. These attempts have focused on Rh(D) expression in one form or another, and they have universally proved unsuccessful, likely secondary to the combined effects of the genetic complexity of the Rh system7  and differences between mouse and human MHC class II peptide presentation. By focusing on the genetically less complicated, yet clinically relevant Kell system, Stowell et al1  have finally overcome this important hurdle. In so doing, they have provided a pre-clinical model in which development and testing of novel therapeutic approaches for the prevention and/or treatment of this devastating disease is now possible.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

1
Stowell
 
SR
Henry
 
KL
Smith
 
NH
et al. 
Alloantibodies to a paternally derived RBC KEL antigen lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn in a murine model.
Blood
2013
, vol. 
122
 
8
(pg. 
1494
-
1504
)
2
Smith
 
NH
Henry
 
KL
Cadwell
 
CM
et al. 
Generation of transgenic mice with antithetical KEL1 and KEL2 human blood group antigens on red blood cells.
Transfusion
2012
, vol. 
52
 
12
(pg. 
2620
-
2630
)
3
Stowell
 
SR
Girard-Pierce
 
KR
Smith
 
NH
et al. 
 
Transfusion of murine red blood cells expressing the human KEL glycoprotein induces clinically significant alloantibodies [published online ahead of print April 29, 2013]. Transfusion
4
Urbaniak
 
SJ
Greiss
 
MA
RhD haemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn.
Blood Rev
2000
, vol. 
14
 
1
(pg. 
44
-
61
)
5
Brinc
 
D
Lazarus
 
AH
 
Mechanisms of anti-D action in the prevention of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Hematol. Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2009;2009(1):185-191
6
Moise
 
KJ
Fetal anemia due to non-Rhesus-D red-cell alloimmunization.
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med
2008
, vol. 
13
 
4
(pg. 
207
-
214
)
7
Chou
 
ST
Westhoff
 
CM
The Rh and RhAG blood group systems.
Immunohematol
2010
, vol. 
26
 
4
(pg. 
178
-
186
)
Sign in via your Institution