Abstract
Background: The double-blind, parallel-group, noninferiorityRE-MEDY™ study comparing the direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate to warfarin in the prevention of secondary venous thromboembolism (VTE) showed non-inferiority of dabigatran to warfarin in both hazard ratio (HR) and risk difference for recurrent symptomatic VTE and related deaths. The benefit-risk balance of dabigatran compared to warfarin in secondary VTE prevention can be further explored by evaluating the net clinical benefit (NCB).
Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of VTE received dabigatran 150 mg twice daily (n = 1430), or warfarin adjusted to maintain an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0–3.0 (n = 1426), for an additional period of 6–36 months after 3–12 months of anticoagulant therapy. NCB in the RE-MEDY™ study was evaluated narrowly by (1) analyzing nonfatal recurrent VTE, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, nonfatal systemic embolism, all-cause death, and major bleeding events (MBEs), and broadly by (2) including clinically relevant bleeding events (CRBEs). The latter is considered more applicable to real-world clinical practice. NCB was also assessed by center time in therapeutic range (cTTR – the mean TTR of all warfarin patients in each center).
Results: The narrow NCB (1) was similar between dabigatran and warfarin (HR 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75–1.46). For the broader NCB (2), a statistically significant difference was evident favoring dabigatran over warfarin (HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59–0.91).
Stratification of the NCB by cTTR quintiles demonstrated that the positive benefit of dabigatran over warfarin was preserved when comparing to warfarin patients with a good INR control.
Conclusion: In the assessment of real-world net clinical benefit in the prevention of secondary VTE, dabigatran was superior to warfarin, irrespective of INR control in the warfarin patients.
. | Dabigatran (N=1430) n (%) . | Warfarin (N=1426) n (%) . | HR (95% CI) . | p value for superiority . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Narrow: Composite cardiovascular endpoint* and MBEs (NCB 1) | 72 (5.0) | 69 (4.8) | 1.05 (0.75–1.46) | 0.7818 |
Broad: Composite cardiovascular endpoint*, MBEs and CRBEs (NCB 2) | 136 (9.5) | 183 (12.8) | 0.73 (0.59, 0.91) | 0.0058 |
. | Dabigatran (N=1430) n (%) . | Warfarin (N=1426) n (%) . | HR (95% CI) . | p value for superiority . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Narrow: Composite cardiovascular endpoint* and MBEs (NCB 1) | 72 (5.0) | 69 (4.8) | 1.05 (0.75–1.46) | 0.7818 |
Broad: Composite cardiovascular endpoint*, MBEs and CRBEs (NCB 2) | 136 (9.5) | 183 (12.8) | 0.73 (0.59, 0.91) | 0.0058 |
*Nonfatal recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, nonfatal systemic embolism, all-cause death.
Schulman:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Eriksson:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kakkar:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kearon:Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada): Consultancy. Schellong:Boehringer Ingelheim: advisory boards Other, Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare: advisory boards, advisory boards Other, Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: advisory boards, advisory boards Other, Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Honoraria. Feuring:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Hantel:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Kreuzer:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Goldhaber:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Daiichi: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.
This icon denotes a clinically relevant abstract
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal