Introduction: Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome (APS) is a serious and deadly disorder leading to a significant risk of thrombi, requiring lifelong therapeutic anticoagulation. Traditionally, the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin has been considered standard of care in this patient population. However, the VKAs require frequent laboratory monitoring, have a narrow therapeutic window, numerous drug interactions and dietary restrictions. Due to these factors, many patients suffer recurrent thrombi and/or major bleeding, warranting therapy modification or switching to parenteral anticoagulants. The non-warfarin oral anticoagulants (NOACs), specifically the direct Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban, have been approved for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and represent attractive options for these patients.

Methods: We designed a retrospective analysis of all patients at the University of Virginia with APS that were treated with either apixaban or rivaroxaban since September 2011. All patients were required to have a definitive diagnosis of APS [defined by the Sydney criteria as an arterial or venous thrombosis and IgM and/or IgG anti-cardiolipin antibody >40GLP, IgG and/or IgM beta-2 glycoprotein >99th percentile, and/or positive lupus anticoagulant (e.g. prolonged silica clot time or dilute Russell viper venom time)]. Patients were reviewed for recurrent thrombi, severe bleeding or other complications that led to changes in their management.

Results: Sixty-six patients were identified with suspected APS, with 18 being treated with a NOAC. Of these, 10 had definitive APS per the Sydney criteria and were analyzed. 6/10 (60%) were treated with apixaban and 4/10 (40%) were treated with rivaroxaban. No patients developed severe bleeding or thrombotic complications and none required changes of their therapy. 30% started a NOAC as the first line outpatient regimen with the remaining 70% being previously treated with other anticoagulants. 7/10 (70%) were treated with warfarin and 3 patients were treated with fondaparinux before changing to a NOAC. Reasons for stopping warfarin were difficulty managing INRs (33%) or thrombi while on warfarin (66%). Of those previously on fondaparinux, reasons for changing therapy were transient ischemic attack (33%), difficulty with injections (33%) and cost (33%). Of these 10 patients, safe and effective anticoagulation with a NOAC was noted for up to 36 months without adverse effects.

Conclusion: Apixaban and rivaroxaban showed to be a safe and effective first line outpatient regimen for patients with APS or patients with APS who develop recurrent thrombi on warfarin or parenteral anticoagulation. Further prospective studies are needed before their use should be considered standard of care.

Table 1.

Patients with Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Treated with Non-Warfarin Oral Anticoagulant

PatientFirst Positive TestSecond Positive TestSerum Testing Performed off WarfarinAnticoagulantLength of Treatment (in months)Bleeding ComplicationsThrombotic ComplicationsPrior Anticoagulant UseReason Therapy was Changed
Cardiolipin IgG 52, β2 IgG >112 Cardiolipin IgG 76, β2 IgG >112;
RVVT prolonged 
No Apixaban None None Yes (warfarin) Difficult to control INR 
Cardiolipin IgG >15;
RVVT prolonged 
Cardiolipin IgG >15;
RVVT prolonged 
Yes Apixaban None None Yes (warfarin) Difficult to control INR 
Cardiolipin & β2 >112 Cardiolipin & β2 >112 Yes Apixaban None None Yes (warfarin) Stroke while on warfarin 
Cardiolipin IgM 66, β2 IgM 68 Cardiolipin IgM 98, β2 IgM 87 Yes Apixaban None None No N/A 
β2 IgG 122;
+ LA 
Cardiolipin & β2 >112 No Apixaban None None Yes (warfarin) Multiple strokes while on warfarin 
β2 IgM 29;
+ LA 
Cardiolipin IgM 50, β2 IgM 74
RVVT prolonged 
Yes Apixaban None None Yes (Fondaparinux) Difficulty with injections 
Cardiolipin IgG 73 Cardiolipin IgG & β2 IgG>112;
RVVT prolonged 
Yes Rivaroxaban 36 None None Yes (warfarin & fondaparinux) Thrombi on warfarin & fondaparinux 
Cardiolipin IgG>112;
RVVT prolonged 
Cardiolipin IgG>112 Yes* Rivaroxaban None None Yes (warfarin) Difficult to control INR 
Cardiolipin IgM & β2 IgM>112 Cardiolipin IgM & β2 IgM>112 Yes* Rivaroxaban 15 None None No N/A 
10 β2 IgG>100
RVVT prolonged 
β2 IgG>100;
RVVT prolonged 
No Rivaroxaban 31 None None Yes (warfarin & fondaparinux) Thrombi on warfarin & fondaparinux 
PatientFirst Positive TestSecond Positive TestSerum Testing Performed off WarfarinAnticoagulantLength of Treatment (in months)Bleeding ComplicationsThrombotic ComplicationsPrior Anticoagulant UseReason Therapy was Changed
Cardiolipin IgG 52, β2 IgG >112 Cardiolipin IgG 76, β2 IgG >112;
RVVT prolonged 
No Apixaban None None Yes (warfarin) Difficult to control INR 
Cardiolipin IgG >15;
RVVT prolonged 
Cardiolipin IgG >15;
RVVT prolonged 
Yes Apixaban None None Yes (warfarin) Difficult to control INR 
Cardiolipin & β2 >112 Cardiolipin & β2 >112 Yes Apixaban None None Yes (warfarin) Stroke while on warfarin 
Cardiolipin IgM 66, β2 IgM 68 Cardiolipin IgM 98, β2 IgM 87 Yes Apixaban None None No N/A 
β2 IgG 122;
+ LA 
Cardiolipin & β2 >112 No Apixaban None None Yes (warfarin) Multiple strokes while on warfarin 
β2 IgM 29;
+ LA 
Cardiolipin IgM 50, β2 IgM 74
RVVT prolonged 
Yes Apixaban None None Yes (Fondaparinux) Difficulty with injections 
Cardiolipin IgG 73 Cardiolipin IgG & β2 IgG>112;
RVVT prolonged 
Yes Rivaroxaban 36 None None Yes (warfarin & fondaparinux) Thrombi on warfarin & fondaparinux 
Cardiolipin IgG>112;
RVVT prolonged 
Cardiolipin IgG>112 Yes* Rivaroxaban None None Yes (warfarin) Difficult to control INR 
Cardiolipin IgM & β2 IgM>112 Cardiolipin IgM & β2 IgM>112 Yes* Rivaroxaban 15 None None No N/A 
10 β2 IgG>100
RVVT prolonged 
β2 IgG>100;
RVVT prolonged 
No Rivaroxaban 31 None None Yes (warfarin & fondaparinux) Thrombi on warfarin & fondaparinux 

*Second serum testing drawn while on rivaroxaban

Disclosures

Off Label Use: Apixaban and rivaroxaban use in patients with Anti-phospholipid Syndrome.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution