Inherited mutations in the erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) causing premature termination of the receptor cytoplasmic region are associated with dominant familial erythrocytosis (FE), a benign clinical condition characterized by hypersensitivity of erythroid progenitor cells to EPO and low serum EPO (S-EPO) levels. We describe a Swedish family with dominant FE in which erythrocytosis segregates with a new truncation in the negative control domain of the EPOR. We show that cells engineered to concomitantly express the wild-type (WT) EPOR and mutant EPORs associated with FE (FE EPORs) are hypersensitive to EPO-stimulated proliferation and activation of Jak2 and Stat5. These results demonstrate that FE is caused by hyperresponsiveness of receptor-mediated signaling pathways and that this is dominant with respect to WT EPOR signaling.
THE SWEDISH erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) allele contains a direct tandem duplication of nucleotides 5968 to 5975. This results in a frameshift beyond residue 405, introducing 25 amino acids not related to the EPOR, and a premature stop codon, deleting 79 residues at the C-terminus of the receptor (data not shown). Affected family members (Fig 1A, Table 1) were plethoric and often had additional symptoms, including hypertension, headaches, dizziness, nosebleeds, and exertional dyspnea, which were most pronounced in the males. These symptoms were alleviated by phlebotomies, and phlebotomy treatment has been recommended.
Subject . | Hgb g/L . | RBC × 1012/L . | Hcrit% . | WBC × 109/L . | Platelets × 109/L . | S-EPO mU/mL . | EPOR Mutation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Affected | |||||||
II11 | 178 | 5.9 | 57 | ||||
II12 | ≈270 | 6.6 | 9.3 | 89 | |||
III15 | ≈245 | 7.2 | 73 | 5.7 | |||
III16 | ≈202 | 5.7 | 78 | 4.1 | |||
III17 | 195 | 6.0 | 55 | 4.2 | 137 | 4 | + |
III18 | 169 | 5.3 | 50 | 7.2 | 164 | 3 | + |
III19 | 160 | 6.7 | 51 | 3.6 | 209 | 7 | + |
IV7 | 172 | 5.5 | 50 | 9.7 | 116 | 6 | + |
IV8 | 178 | 5.6 | 52 | 7.4 | 140 | 3 | + |
IV11 | 173 | 5.2 | 51 | 7.9 | 215 | 4 | + |
V2 | 152 | 5.2 | 44 | 8 | + | ||
Unaffected | |||||||
II2 | 154 | 4.5 | |||||
II10 | 134 | ||||||
IV9 | 149 | 4.7 | 43 | 5.2 | 186 | 12 | − |
IV10 | 139 | 4.6 | 40 | 7.4 | 212 | 6 | − |
IV12 | 126 | 4.2 | 38 | 6.2 | 259 | 19 | − |
IV13 | 158 | 5.2 | 46 | 7.1 | 298 | 9 | − |
V1 | 135 | 4.9 | 40 | 18 | − | ||
V3 | 125 | 4.4 | 36 | 7.5 | 446 | 13 | − |
V4 | 118 | 4.2 | 33 | 6.4 | 283 | 12 | − |
Subject . | Hgb g/L . | RBC × 1012/L . | Hcrit% . | WBC × 109/L . | Platelets × 109/L . | S-EPO mU/mL . | EPOR Mutation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Affected | |||||||
II11 | 178 | 5.9 | 57 | ||||
II12 | ≈270 | 6.6 | 9.3 | 89 | |||
III15 | ≈245 | 7.2 | 73 | 5.7 | |||
III16 | ≈202 | 5.7 | 78 | 4.1 | |||
III17 | 195 | 6.0 | 55 | 4.2 | 137 | 4 | + |
III18 | 169 | 5.3 | 50 | 7.2 | 164 | 3 | + |
III19 | 160 | 6.7 | 51 | 3.6 | 209 | 7 | + |
IV7 | 172 | 5.5 | 50 | 9.7 | 116 | 6 | + |
IV8 | 178 | 5.6 | 52 | 7.4 | 140 | 3 | + |
IV11 | 173 | 5.2 | 51 | 7.9 | 215 | 4 | + |
V2 | 152 | 5.2 | 44 | 8 | + | ||
Unaffected | |||||||
II2 | 154 | 4.5 | |||||
II10 | 134 | ||||||
IV9 | 149 | 4.7 | 43 | 5.2 | 186 | 12 | − |
IV10 | 139 | 4.6 | 40 | 7.4 | 212 | 6 | − |
IV12 | 126 | 4.2 | 38 | 6.2 | 259 | 19 | − |
IV13 | 158 | 5.2 | 46 | 7.1 | 298 | 9 | − |
V1 | 135 | 4.9 | 40 | 18 | − | ||
V3 | 125 | 4.4 | 36 | 7.5 | 446 | 13 | − |
V4 | 118 | 4.2 | 33 | 6.4 | 283 | 12 | − |
“Affected,” those with either clinical evidence of erythrocytosis or presence of an EPOR mutation or both. “Unaffected,” no clinical evidence of erythrocytosis or EPOR mutation. Normal hematological parameters are: hemoglobin (Hgb), males 122-166 g/L, females 113-153 g/L; red blood cell count (RBC), males 4.1-5.4 × 1012/L, females 3.7-4.9 × 1012/L; hematocrit (Hcrit), males 39% to 49%, females 37% to 44%; white blood cell count (WBC), 4.0-10.0 × 109/L; platelets, 125-340 × 109/L; S-EPO, 5-19 mU/mL.
To investigate the molecular mechanisms of erythrocytosis, the Swedish mutation and a previously described mutation from a Finnish family (6002G → A)1 2 were engineered in the murine EPOR (mSwed and mFin, respectively). Clonal 32D cell lines expressing these EPOR isoforms were established. To approximate EPOR expression patterns predicted for heterozygous individuals, clonal cell lines coexpressing wild-type (WT) and mutant EPORs were also established (data not shown). The mFin and mSwed EPORs rendered hypersensitive proliferative responses to EPO and dominantly enhanced the proliferative response of the WT EPOR (Fig 1B).
EPO hypersensitivity could be caused by differential receptor metabolism or altered signal transduction. Cell-surface receptor expression did not vary more than 2-fold, as judged by flow cytometry analysis, and the intracellular processing of newly synthesized WT, mFin, or mSwed was similar (data not shown). These results suggest that differential receptor metabolism is unlikely to be the sole cause of the observed EPO-hypersensitivity.
To examine EPOR signaling, we assayed EPO-dependent activation of Jak2 and Stat5 by immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis.3-5 Cells expressing the mutant receptors alone or coexpressing mutant and WT EPORs had elevated levels of activated Jak2 and Stat5 at all EPO concentrations tested, relative to cells expressing the WT receptor alone (Fig 1C and D). Stat5 also demonstrated hypersensitivity to EPO, with half-maximal activation at ≈0.2 U/mL EPO in cells expressing mutant EPORs compared to 1.0 U/mL EPO in WT cells. Similar levels of Jak2 or Stat5 were present in all samples (data not shown).
Heterozygous individuals with FE are predicted to express both WT and mutant EPORs,1,6-8 although this has not yet been documented. Our study provides the first analysis of cells engineered to coexpress WT and FE EPOR isoforms. The results show that FE alleles confer dominant and hypersensitive EPO-dependent proliferation and activation of Jak2 and Stat5. The hypersensitive response may reflect mechanistic differences in Jak2 activation or inactivation by FE EPORs, compared with WT EPOR. For example, the mutant receptors may abrogate one or more negative-regulatory signals, such as SHP-1 or CIS,9-11 that normally suppress Jak2 activity, while still stimulating positive regulatory signals. Collectively, our results indicate that dominant FE is caused by enhanced receptor signaling because expression of a mutant allele in the heterozygous state is sufficient to unbalance WT signal transduction.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Adriana Acurio, Hong Lu, and Melanie Wickert for excellent technical assistance; Karen Ramirez for flow cytometry analysis; Dr Joan Egrie (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) for the generous gift of recombinant EPO; and Dr Harvey F. Lodish for initiating this collaboration and for advice during the course of these studies.
Supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (CA-77447) and the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Advanced Research Program (15-120) (to S.S.W.), and by grants from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (CA-67941 and CA-16058) (to A.d.l.C.).
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
REFERENCES
Author notes
Address reprint requests to Stephanie S. Watowich, PhD, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Box 178, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal