The recent report by Gajjar et al1 demonstrates impressively the adverse effect of a traumatic lumbar puncture (defined as more than 10 red blood cells per microliter of cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) at the time of diagnosis on treatment outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The inferior prognosis can be predominantly observed in a subgroup of patients with 2 consecutive traumatic lumbar punctures and the detection of leukemic cells in the CSF. The authors conclude that the iatrogenic introduction of leukemic cells into the CSF may be one reason for the reduced outcome.

In the treatment protocols XI2 and XII3 of the St Judes Children's Research Hospital, the patients received the first intrathecal therapy with methotrexate, hydrocortisone, and cytarabine at day 2. Thus they had a period of at least 24 hours without sufficient central nervous system (CNS)–directed treatment. In contrast, in ALL–Berlin-Frankfurt-Munich (BFM) frontline protocols, the first intrathecal methothrexate is immediately administered during the diagnostic lumbar puncture. Consecutive lumbar punctures (at diagnosis and for CNS-directed treatment), which may increase the risk of contamination of the CSF with blast cells, are not necessary. Furthermore, Gajjar et al's data show a surprisingly high percentage of traumatic punctures (21%), in more than half of the cases with detection of leukemic blasts in the CSF after cytocentrifugation.1 

From 88 children with initial ALL treated in our institution between November 1995 and January 2001, 56 CSF preparations of the diagnostic lumbar puncture had been preserved and the CNS status could be reevaluated. A traumatic lumbar puncture according to the above classification groups occurred in 4 out of 56 cases (7%), and in only 1 sample could 1 single leukemic cell be observed. Hitherto, 5 children suffered a leukemic relapse (3 isolated and 2 combined bone marrow/testis relapses). No CNS relapse occurred within this group.

These data emphasize the importance of a properly performed lumbar puncture particularly at time point of diagnosis when higher numbers of blast cells are circulating in the peripheral blood. Diagnostic lumbar punctures should only be done by an experienced physician. Furthermore, early administration of CNS-directed therapy might help to reduce the risk of blast cell microdissemination in the case of iatrogenic inoculation of blood during the procedure.

We agree with the recommendations of Kebelmann-Betzing et al that initial lumbar puncture should be performed by an experienced clinician and followed immediately by intrathecal therapy. As also stated in our article,1-1 we now routinely perform this procedure with patients under short-acting general anesthesia. When the diagnosis of leukemia is uncertain because of the lack of circulating leukemic cells, we postpone lumbar puncture and intrathecal therapy until the diagnosis is established by bone marrow examination.

It is difficult to compare the frequency of traumatic lumbar puncture in the series of Kebelmann-Betzing et al with that of ours because the status of their patients was determined retrospectively on the basis of “preserved” cerebrospinal fluid; in contrast, we used fresh samples of cerebrospinal fluid. The integrity of the erythrocytes and the morphology of the leukocytes are expected to be altered in preserved samples. Since we first implemented steps to reduce this iatrogenic complication, we have substantially reduced the frequency of traumatic lumbar punctures with blast cells from 11% to 5% and that of traumatic lumbar punctures without blast cells from 10% to 7%. It should be noted that we stringently define traumatic lumbar puncture as at least 10 erythrocytes per microliter.

As shown by Total Therapy Study XIII,1-2 early intensive intrathecal and systemic therapy is now more successful in treating and preventing central nervous system (CNS) leukemia, even in patients whose leukemic blast cells are iatrogenically introduced into the cerebrospinal fluid by traumatic lumbar puncture. Therefore, cranial irradiation is seldom necessary in contemporary treatment programs. But others have reported neuropsychologic deficits in children who received CNS-directed therapy consisting solely of approximately 20 intrathecal treatments of methotrexate, hydrocortisone, and cytarabine over 3 years.1-3 The challenge now is to optimize intrathecal and systemic therapy to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity. Developing appropriate measures to avoid traumatic lumbar puncture and hence the need of extra intrathecal therapy is but one step toward this goal.

References

1-1
Gajjar
A
Harrison
PL
Sandlund
JT
et al
Traumatic lumbar puncture at diagnosis adversely affects outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Blood.
96
2000
3381
3384
1-2
Pui
C-H
Mahmoud
HH
Rivera
GK
et al
Early intensification of intrathecal chemotherapy virtually eliminates central nervous system relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Blood.
92
1998
411
415
1-3
Hill
DE
Ciesielski
KT
Sethre-Hofstad
L
Duncan
MH
Lorenzi
M
Visual and verbal short-term memory deficits in childhood leukemia survivors after intrathecal chemotherapy.
J Pediatr Psychol.
22
1997
861
870
1
Gajjar
A
Harrison
PL
Sandlund
JT
et al
Traumatic lumbar puncture at diagnosis adversely affects outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Blood.
96
2000
3381
3384
2
Rivera
GK
Raimondi
SC
Hancock
ML
et al
Improved outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with reinforced early treatment and rotational combination chemotherapy.
Lancet.
337
1991
61
66
3
Evans
WE
Relling
MV
Rodman
JH
Crom
WR
Boyett
JM
Pui
C-H
Conventional compared with individualized chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
N Engl J Med.
338
1998
499
505
Sign in via your Institution