Rheingold SR, Bhojwani D, Ji L, et al. Determinants of survival after first relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children’s Oncology Group study. Leukemia. 2024;38(11):2382-2394.

Improvements in survival among children and adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are attributable to increased understanding of leukemia biology and well-defined prognostic factors that dictate risk-adapted upfront therapy, including age, presenting white blood cell count, central nervous system (CNS) involvement, cytomolecular subtype, and end-of-induction (EOI) measurable residual disease (MRD).1  Historically, children and AYAs with ALL who experience relapse remain a challenge to treat.2,3  And at relapse diagnosis, prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) are not as well defined. A prior Children’s Oncology Group (COG) study detailing outcomes for relapsed ALL patients enrolled in clinical trials between 1988 and 2002 reported a 20.5% relapse rate and a five-year OS of 36% for the entire cohort (37.5% for B-cell ALL [B-ALL]),4  consistent with outcomes in other international groups.5,6  Together, these studies have identified a few general prognostic factors in the relapse setting, including immunophenotype (B vs. T), time to relapse, site of relapse, and MRD after re-induction; however, evaluation of additional clinical, cytogenetic, and biological risk factors have been limited due to small numbers and inadequate data.

Susan R. Rheingold, MD, and colleagues recently analyzed the largest dataset to date of newly diagnosed pediatric and AYA patients (n=16,115) with B-ALL, T-cell ALL (T-ALL), and infant B-ALL (diagnosed <1 year of age) enrolled in 12 frontline COG clinical trials between 1996 and 2014, with the goal of describing clinical features at first relapse and identifying prognostic indicators for survival after relapse. In this updated cohort, overall relapse rates were lower at 12.7%. Among 13,771 B-ALL patients, 1,715 (12.5%) relapsed, a significantly higher percentage of whom were classified as National Cancer Institute (NCI) high risk (19%, 754/3,974) as compared to NCI standard risk (9.8%, 961/9,797; p>0.0001). Among 2,109 T-ALL patients, 227 (11.2%) relapsed, while 111 of 325 infants with B-ALL (34.2%) relapsed, including 90 of whom had KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2A-r) ALL.

Relapse risk was significantly higher for males, infants, and patients aged 10 years or older at initial diagnosis, with further increased risk in those aged 16 or older. Leukemia phenotype had different distribution of relapse sites, as well as time to relapse. Half of B-ALL relapses occurred late (defined as >36 months from diagnosis; median time to relapse of 34.6 months), with 72.5% involving the bone marrow and 32.9% involving CNS. This differed from T-ALL patients, among whom 64.8% experienced early relapse (defined as <18 months from diagnosis) and 82% relapsed in less than 36 months from diagnosis (median time to relapse of 13.8 months), with 56.5% involving bone marrow and 47.1% involving CNS. T-ALL patients had higher rates of isolated CNS (iCNS) relapse (31.4% vs. 21.7% in B-ALL patients), with more than 80% of these occurring less than 18 months from diagnosis. Notably, 67.9% of these patients had CNS-3 status at original diagnosis and received cranial radiation as part of their frontline regimen. Among the infant B-ALL cohort, median time to relapse was 13.9 months, with 77.8% involving bone marrow and 23.1% involving CNS.

For all relapsed patients, the five-year OS from relapse diagnosis was 48.9%±1.2% (52.5%±1.3% for B-ALL and 35.5%±3.3% for T-ALL; Figure). Unfortunately, this study demonstrated no improvement in survival for infants with B-ALL compared to the prior cohort, with OS at 21.5%±3.9%, an even more dismal OS of 9.0±3.2% for those with early relapse, and no survivors among infants who relapsed prior to 1 year of age (Figure).

Figure

Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival rates post relapse

Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; B-ALL, B-cell ALL; BM, bone marrow; CNS, central nervous system; T-ALL, T-cell ALL.

Kaplan-Meier estimates based on (A) immunophenotype, (B) B-ALL time to relapse, (C) B-ALL site of relapse, (D) B-ALL cytogenetic subtype, (E) T-ALL time to relapse, (F) T-ALL site of relapse, (G) infant ALL cytogenetic subtype, (H) Infant ALL time to relapse, and (I) infant ALL site of relapse.

Figure reprinted from Rheingold, et al.

Figure

Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival rates post relapse

Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; B-ALL, B-cell ALL; BM, bone marrow; CNS, central nervous system; T-ALL, T-cell ALL.

Kaplan-Meier estimates based on (A) immunophenotype, (B) B-ALL time to relapse, (C) B-ALL site of relapse, (D) B-ALL cytogenetic subtype, (E) T-ALL time to relapse, (F) T-ALL site of relapse, (G) infant ALL cytogenetic subtype, (H) Infant ALL time to relapse, and (I) infant ALL site of relapse.

Figure reprinted from Rheingold, et al.

Close modal

This study identified additional risk factors for B-ALL patients that independently predicted survival outcomes. Although EOI MRD greater than or equal to 0.01% during frontline therapy has previously been associated with increased relapse risk, this study demonstrated that on multivariable analysis, EOI MRD of greater than or equal to 0.1% was associated with shorter time to relapse and inferior five-year OS after relapse of 37.7±2.6%, compared to 58.2±1.6% in those who had MRD of less than 0.1% (p<0.005; Table). Cytogenetic subtype in B-ALL patients was also found to be an important prognostic factor for survival that was closely related to time to relapse, supporting leukemia biology as a driver of clinical behavior. Post-relapse OS for B-ALL was significantly better for those with favorable cytogenetics, including a five-year OS of 74.4±3.1% for ETV6-RUNX1-positive ALL and 70.2±3.6% for patients with simultaneous trisomies of chromosomes 4 and 10 (median times to relapse of 43 months for both subtypes), compared to those with unfavorable cytogenetics, including a five-year OS of 14.2±6.1% for those with hypodiploid ALL and 31.9±7.7% for those with KMT2A-r ALL (median times to relapse of 12.5 and 18 months, respectively; Figure, Table).

Table

Multivariable analyses of risk factors on overall survival post relapse

VariablesB-ALLT-ALLInfant ALL
 HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) 
Time to relapse p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 
Early (<18 mo.) 
Intermediate (18-36 mo.) 0.47 (0.4-0.57) 0.53 (0.34-0.85) 0.16 (0.08-0.31) 
Late (≥36 mo.) 0.21 (0.17-0.26) 0.23 (0.12-0.43) 0.16 (0.03-0.71) 
Relapse site p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 
Isolated BM 
Combined BM (±CNS) 0.74 (0.60-0.93) 0.98 (0.59-1.61) 0.71 (0.34-1.49) 
Isolated CNS 0.32 (0.26-0.39) 0.27 (0.17-0.43) 0.23 (0.10-0.55) 
Other 0.49 (0.35-0.7) 0.49 (0.27-0.89) 1.46 (0.67-3.16) 
Induction day 29 MRD p=0.010   
<0.01%   
0.01-0.099% 0.98 (0.81-1.19)   
0.1-0.99% 1.20 (0.97-1.49)   
≥1.0% 1.41 (1.09-1.84)   
Unknown 1.34 (1.02-1.75)   
Trisomy 4+10 p=0.004   
Negative   
Positive 0.66 (0.50-0.88)   
ETV6-RUNX1 p=0.001   
Negative   
Positive 0.62 (0.46-0.82)   
KMT2A-rearranged p=0.050   
Negative   
Positive 1.52 (1.00-2.29)   
Hypodiploid p=0.002   
Negative   
Positive 1.85 (1.25-2.75)   
VariablesB-ALLT-ALLInfant ALL
 HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) 
Time to relapse p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 
Early (<18 mo.) 
Intermediate (18-36 mo.) 0.47 (0.4-0.57) 0.53 (0.34-0.85) 0.16 (0.08-0.31) 
Late (≥36 mo.) 0.21 (0.17-0.26) 0.23 (0.12-0.43) 0.16 (0.03-0.71) 
Relapse site p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 
Isolated BM 
Combined BM (±CNS) 0.74 (0.60-0.93) 0.98 (0.59-1.61) 0.71 (0.34-1.49) 
Isolated CNS 0.32 (0.26-0.39) 0.27 (0.17-0.43) 0.23 (0.10-0.55) 
Other 0.49 (0.35-0.7) 0.49 (0.27-0.89) 1.46 (0.67-3.16) 
Induction day 29 MRD p=0.010   
<0.01%   
0.01-0.099% 0.98 (0.81-1.19)   
0.1-0.99% 1.20 (0.97-1.49)   
≥1.0% 1.41 (1.09-1.84)   
Unknown 1.34 (1.02-1.75)   
Trisomy 4+10 p=0.004   
Negative   
Positive 0.66 (0.50-0.88)   
ETV6-RUNX1 p=0.001   
Negative   
Positive 0.62 (0.46-0.82)   
KMT2A-rearranged p=0.050   
Negative   
Positive 1.52 (1.00-2.29)   
Hypodiploid p=0.002   
Negative   
Positive 1.85 (1.25-2.75)   

Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; B-ALL, B-cell ALL; BM, bone marrow; CNS, central nervous system; HR, hazard ratio; MRD, measurable residual disease; T-ALL, T-cell ALL.

Table adapted from Rheingold, et al.

This analysis of pediatric and AYA patients with B-ALL, T-ALL, and infant ALL demonstrates a decrease in relapse rates to 12.7%, compared to 20.5% in the earlier cohort,4  as well as significant improvement in five-year OS after relapse in both B-ALL and T-ALL patients. These results will serve as a helpful comparison for understanding the impact of new therapies for leukemia, including blinatumomab7-10  and other targeted11  and immunotherapies,12,13  which we hope will continue to further decrease relapse rates and improve outcomes for such patients. This study has identified particularly high-risk patient populations with poor outcomes after relapse (i.e., infants, adolescents >16 years of age, patients with T-ALL relapse involving bone marrow, and those with hypodiploid B-ALL; Figure, Table) who would benefit from novel therapies and alternatives to conventional chemotherapy at relapse diagnosis.

Drs. Zorn and Pommert indicated no relevant conflicts of interest.

1
Hunger
SP
,
Mullighan
CG
.
Redefining ALL classification: toward detecting high-risk ALL and implementing precision medicine
.
Blood
.
2015
;
125
(
26
):
3977
3987
.
2
Hunger
SP
,
Mullighan
CG
.
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children
.
N Engl J Med
.
2015
;
373
(
16
):
1541
1552
.
3
Sun
W
,
Malvar
J
,
Sposto
R
, et al
.
Re-induction outcome for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a retrospective cohort study of the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia consortium
.
Blood
.
2015
;
126
(
23
):
3760
.
4
Nguyen
K
,
Devidas
M
,
Cheng
S-C
, et al
.
Factors influencing survival after relapse from acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children’s Oncology Group study
.
Leukemia
.
2008
;
22
(
12
):
2142
2150
.
5
Oskarsson
T
,
Söderhäll
S
,
Arvidson
J
, et al
.
Relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Nordic countries: prognostic factors, treatment and outcome
.
Haematologica
.
2016
;
101
(
1
):
68
76
.
6
Eckert
C
,
Parker
C
,
Moorman
AV
, et al
.
Risk factors and outcomes in children with high-risk B-cell precursor and T-cell relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: combined analysis of ALLR3 and ALL-REZ BFM 2002 clinical trials
.
Eur J Cancer
.
2021
;
151
:
175
189
.
7
Gupta
S
,
Rau
RE
,
Kairalla
JA
, et al
.
Blinatumomab in standard-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children
.
N Engl J Med
.
Published online
December
7
,
2024
. doi:
8
Brown
PA
,
Ji
L
,
Xu
X
, et al
.
Effect of postreinduction therapy consolidation with blinatumomab vs chemotherapy on disease-free survival in children, adolescents, and young adults with first relapse of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a randomized clinical trial
.
JAMA
.
2021
;
325
(
9
):
833
842
.
9
Van der Sluis
IM
,
de Lorenzo
P
,
Kotecha
RS
, et al
.
Blinatumomab added to chemotherapy in infant lymphoblastic leukemia
.
N Engl J Med
.
2023
;
388
(
17
):
1572
1581
.
10
Pieters
R
,
de Lorenzo
P
,
Ancliffe
P
, et al
.
Outcome of infants younger than 1 year with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with the Interfant-06 protocol: results from an international phase III randomized study
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2019
;
37
(
25
):
2246
2256
.
11
O’Brien
MM
,
Ji
L
,
Shah
NN
, et al
.
Phase II trial of inotuzumab ozogamicin in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children’s Oncology Group protocol AALL1621
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2022
;
40
(
9
):
956
967
.
12
Maude
SL
.
Tisagenlecleucel in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol
.
2018
;
16
(
10
):
664
666
.
13
Laetsch
TW
,
Maude
SL
,
Rives
S
, et al
.
Three-year update of tisagenlecleucel in pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the ELIANA trial
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2023
;
41
(
9
):
1664
1669
.