In Brief
In the early 20th century, Emil Heitz studied chromatin structure under the microscope and discovered the presence of heterochromatin (condensed chromatin) and euchromatin (decondensed chromatin) in eukaryotes1 . Later, it was discovered that genes in euchromatin were actively transcribed while genes in the heterochromatin remained largely silenced. Chromatin structure is comprised of nucleosome units, each formed by DNA and histone proteins. The histone proteins in heterochromatin are heavily acetylated and demethylated, and, as a result, genes located in the heterochromatin area of chromosomes are less accessible to the transcription machinery of the cell2 . Deacetylation, mediated by histone deacetylase, and methylation by Su(var)3-9 with subsequent binding of HP1, play an important role in the stabilization of D. melanogaster heterochromatin structure and the silencing of genes. A similar array of enzymes and nuclear chromatin-binding proteins are involved in the epigenetic silencing of genes in higher eukaryotes, including humans. The findings of Shi et al., which identify a role for the JAK/STAT pathway in “global” reversal of heterochromatic gene silencing, are significant because they show a direct link between signaling events and gene expression. The tumorogenesis seen in the gain-of-function JAK mutant (hopTum-l) might be due to removal of the epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes, a removal that could be reversed in D. melanogaster by overexpression of the heterochromatin stabilizing protein HP1. The existence of a similar mechanism in JAK2V617F-induced myeloproliferative disorders is a tantalizing possibility that demands further investigation. The work of Shi and colleagues might also explain the dominant inhibitory, regulatory role of wild-type JAK2 co-expressed with JAK2V617F in vitro (these cells lose the erythropoietin independence that is seen in cells transfected with JAK2V617F)3 . Perhaps, wild-type JAK2 signaling counteracts the epigenetic changes induced by JAK2V617F and reverses the phenotype of cells carrying both wild-type and mutant JAK2 back to normal. Further, the mutagenesis-promoting properties of hyperactive JAK such as JAK2V617F may explain the frequent mitotic crossover in PV (present in 30 percent of PV patients) resulting in uniparenteral disomy and a high rate of homozygosity for somatic JAK2V617F mutation4 .
References
Competing Interests
Drs. Afshar-Kharghan and Prchal indicated no relevant conflicts of interest.