Abstract
Background: Induction therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) patients who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has evolved with the introduction of novel agents, such as bortezomib (VELCADE®, Vel) and thalidomide (THALOMID®, Thal). Phase 3 trial data show the clinical effectiveness of front-line bortezomib-based therapies, but little is known about the comparative economic benefit of bortezomib-based regimens in newly diagnosed MM in the transplant setting. Here we report a pharmacoeconomic analysis of the IFM 2005-01, GIMEMA MMY-3006, and the Myeloma-Autogreffe Group (MAG) phase 3 trials, comparing the relative costs of Vel–dexamethasone (Vel/Dex), vincristine–doxorubicin–dexamethasone (VAD), Vel–Thal–Dex (VTD), and Thal–Dex (TD).
Methods: Expanding on a previous budget impact model of bortezomib treatment for relapsed MM (
Results: In IFM 2005-01, estimated mean per-patient treatment costs from start of induction to completion of second transplant (if required) were lower for patients receiving Vel/Dex induction ($201,793) versus VAD ($217,526), due to better post-induction response with Vel/Dex. More patients achieved post-transplant ≥VGPR with Vel/Dex than with VAD (72% vs 52%), and therefore did not require a second transplant. Similarly, in GIMEMA MMY-3006, post-induction and posttransplant ≥VGPR achieved with VTD induction was greater than that achieved with TD (post-induction: 60% vs 27% and post-transplant: 77% vs 54%), thereby reducing the need for a second transplant among patients receiving VTD induction therapy. Consequently, estimated mean treatment costs were lower for patients receiving VTD induction ($200,093) versus TD ($218,886). Estimated mean treatment costs for patients receiving VD induction in IFM 2005-01 ($201,793) and VTD induction in GIMEMA MMY-3006 ($200,093) were both lower than those for patients receiving TD induction in the MAG phase 3 trial ($239,851).
Conclusions: In summary, the model showed that total costs were lower for patients receiving bortezomib-based induction compared with TD induction in both the GIMEMA MMY-3006 and MAG trials. These health economic analyses also suggest that bortezomib-based induction results in lower mean per-patient treatment costs when compared with VAD or TD induction, primarily due to better response post-first ASCT.
Table: Cost Summaries of ASCT Trials
Induction costs . | VD (IFM) . | VTD (GIMEMA) . | TD (MAG) . |
---|---|---|---|
Drugs | $15,940 | $24,273 | $16,596 |
Medical care | $4,147 | $3,578 | $1,019 |
Adverse events | $2,948 | $1000 | $5,610 |
Total induction costs (per patient) | $23,035 | $28,852 | $23,225 |
Transplant costs | |||
1st ASCT | $139,220 | $139,220 | $139,220 |
2nd ASCT | $39,538 | $32,021 | $77,406 |
Total transplant costs (per patient) | $178,758 | $171,241 | $216,626 |
TOTAL costs | $201,793 | $200,093 | $239,851 |
Induction costs . | VD (IFM) . | VTD (GIMEMA) . | TD (MAG) . |
---|---|---|---|
Drugs | $15,940 | $24,273 | $16,596 |
Medical care | $4,147 | $3,578 | $1,019 |
Adverse events | $2,948 | $1000 | $5,610 |
Total induction costs (per patient) | $23,035 | $28,852 | $23,225 |
Transplant costs | |||
1st ASCT | $139,220 | $139,220 | $139,220 |
2nd ASCT | $39,538 | $32,021 | $77,406 |
Total transplant costs (per patient) | $178,758 | $171,241 | $216,626 |
TOTAL costs | $201,793 | $200,093 | $239,851 |
Disclosures: Wang:Millennium: Research Funding. Duh:Millennium: Research Funding. Huang:Millennium: Employment. White:Millennium: Research Funding. Chang:Millennium: Research Funding. Esseltine:Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership; Millennium: Employment. Marantz:Millennium: Employment.
Author notes
Corresponding author