Abstract 308

Introduction:

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) has previously reported the superior 1 and 2 year survival of Ld versus LD as initial therapy in newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) (Rajkumar et al Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 29–37). The 1 year and 2 year OS for Ld vs LD were 96% and 85% vs 88% and 78%, (p < 0.01), respectively. This despite higher ORR in LD vs Ld (79% vs 68%; p = 0.008). The difference in OS was predominantly due to early death in the LD group (5% vs 0.5%; p = 0.003). As a result of this analysis, Ld is now considered the standard of care. However, it should be noted that the majority of these deaths occurred in pts > 65. In this analysis, we evaluated the impact of age on dexamethasone dose intensity and OS.

Methods:

445 pts were randomly assigned: 223 to LD and 222 to Ld. Pts were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis for OS. The pts were analyzed by age in 2 groups: < 65 and > 65 (the age corresponding to transplant eligibility outside the US). The pts > 65 were then further subdivided into >70 and > 75 yrs. Results are expressed as OS probability at 1 and 2 years post randomization. In addition, to eliminate the early death ‘penalty’ in the LD group in the original analysis, a landmark analysis was performed at 4 months.

Results:

Overall Survival Probability: Intent-to Treat Analysis

LDLdLDLdLDLd
AgeN/EventsN/Events1 yr1 yr2 yr2 yr
<65 104/16 108/19 .92 .96 .86 .92 
>65 119/40 113/33 .84 .95 .72 .85 
>70 76/30 71/18 .78 .96 .67 .89 
>75 38/11 30/13 .76 .90 .60 .76 
LDLdLDLdLDLd
AgeN/EventsN/Events1 yr1 yr2 yr2 yr
<65 104/16 108/19 .92 .96 .86 .92 
>65 119/40 113/33 .84 .95 .72 .85 
>70 76/30 71/18 .78 .96 .67 .89 
>75 38/11 30/13 .76 .90 .60 .76 

Overall Survival Probability: 4 month Landmark Analysis

LDLdLDLdLDLd
AgeN/EventsN/Events1 yr1 yr2 yr2 yr
<65 103/15 106/17 .93 .98 .86 .93 
>65 109/30 113/33 .92 .96 .79 .86 
>70 67/21 70/17 .88 .97 .76 .90 
>75 34/14 29/12 .85 .93 .67 .79 
LDLdLDLdLDLd
AgeN/EventsN/Events1 yr1 yr2 yr2 yr
<65 103/15 106/17 .93 .98 .86 .93 
>65 109/30 113/33 .92 .96 .79 .86 
>70 67/21 70/17 .88 .97 .76 .90 
>75 34/14 29/12 .85 .93 .67 .79 
Conclusions:

As previously reported, OS in the trial at 1 and 2 years was superior with Ld. OS was not superior with LD compared with Ld in any age group despite a higher response rate. This was true even when using a landmark analysis to eliminate the 5% early deaths seen in the first 4 months of treatment. We conclude the following: 1) LD is not definitively superior to Ld in any age group; 2) Given the higher toxicity in the absence of a clear survival benefit with LD, Ld remains the best choice for all ages. This analysis confirms the original opinion that low-dose dexamethasone is the standard of care for all newly diagnosed MM pts, regardless of age.

Disclosures:

Vesole:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Centorcor-Ortho-Biotech: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for front-line therapy in multiple myeloma. Abonour:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Callander:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Fonseca:Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy; Onyx: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; Intellikine: Consultancy. Siegel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution