Abstract 4973

Background/Rationale:

Rituximab is an anti-CD-20 monoclonal antibody used in the management of lymphoproliferative disorders. Rituximab is indicated in maintenance therapy for follicular cell lymphoma and can be administered once every 2 months, once every 3 months, or weekly for 4 weeks every 6 months. The use of maintenance rituximab has improved progression free survival and overall survival in low grade follicular lymphomas. Although rapid rituximab infusions have been studied extensively, there is little data on the use of rapid infusions during maintenance therapy for low grade lymphomas. Herein we report our experience with rapid infusion rituximab in patients receiving maintenance therapy.

Methods:

All patients who received rapid infusion rituximab as maintenance therapy for low grade lymphoma between December 2007 and June 2011 were included. Patients were considered eligible for rapid infusions if they tolerated previous rituximab infusions and presented with a peripheral lymphocyte count of less than 4.8 k/μl. Rapid rituximab infusions were administered over 90 minutes (150 mL/hr for 30 minutes and then increased to 275 mL/hr until completion). Patients were monitored for signs and symptoms of reactions. In case of an infusion reaction supportive care medications were readily available. Demographic, laboratory and clinical data were collected. Adverse events were assessed through vital signs, symptoms of infusion related reaction and supportive care measures administered and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. The primary and secondary objectives of this retrospective study were to evaluate the incidence of grade 3/4 and all grade infusion reactions with rapid rituximab infusions during maintenance therapy, respectively. Maintenance schedules were also compared with regards to incidence of infusion reactions.

Results:

A total of 105 patients received 629 rapid rituximab infusions. Patient demographics, laboratory, and clinical data are summarized in Table 1. All patients were eligible for rapid infusion rituximab according to institutional criteria. Two grade 2 infusion reactions and 4 grade 3 reactions were reported (1 patient experienced a grade 2 and 3 reaction); however none of these patients required hospitalization. All 5 patients received pharmacological and/or supportive care to relieve the symptoms associated with the reaction. Of these 5 patients, 3 patients went on to receive rapid infusions of rituximab; 2 patients were switched to standard infusion per physician request. The sample size was too small to determine if a correlation existed between infusion related reactions and the schedule of maintenance rituximab.

Table 1
Patient Demographicsn=105
    Male, n (%) 55 (52.4) 
    Median BSA (range), m2 1.97 (1.36-2.84) 
Diagnosis n (%) 
    Follicular Lymphoma 65 (62) 
    Marginal Zone Lymphoma 10 (9.5) 
    Large B-cell lymphoma 9 (8.6) 
    Mantle Cell Lymphoma 8 (7.6) 
    CLL/SLL 5 (4.8) 
    Mucosa Associated Lymphoid Tissue 3 (2.8) 
    Other 5 (4.8) 
Baseline Laboratory Parameters k/μL (range) 
    Median lymphocyte count 1.1 (0.04-8.21) 
    edian WBC 5.14 (1.34-13.07) 
Rituximab  
    Median Dose, mg 750 (510-1090) 
    Median No. Doses 5 (1-12) 
    Mean Infusion Time, min 90 (85-97) 
Patient Demographicsn=105
    Male, n (%) 55 (52.4) 
    Median BSA (range), m2 1.97 (1.36-2.84) 
Diagnosis n (%) 
    Follicular Lymphoma 65 (62) 
    Marginal Zone Lymphoma 10 (9.5) 
    Large B-cell lymphoma 9 (8.6) 
    Mantle Cell Lymphoma 8 (7.6) 
    CLL/SLL 5 (4.8) 
    Mucosa Associated Lymphoid Tissue 3 (2.8) 
    Other 5 (4.8) 
Baseline Laboratory Parameters k/μL (range) 
    Median lymphocyte count 1.1 (0.04-8.21) 
    edian WBC 5.14 (1.34-13.07) 
Rituximab  
    Median Dose, mg 750 (510-1090) 
    Median No. Doses 5 (1-12) 
    Mean Infusion Time, min 90 (85-97) 
Conclusion:

The rapid infusion of rituximab in patients receiving maintenance therapy is well tolerated with minimal incidence of infusion-related reactions. Although the sample size was insufficient to assess differences in adverse effects according to the maintenance schedule, the low overall incidence of adverse effects suggests that rapid rituximab infusions are well tolerated regardless of maintenance schedule. Our study concludes rapid infusion rituximab is a safe and feasible option for maintenance therapy.

Disclosures:

Ho:Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Maintenance Rituximab Therapy in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Cultrera:Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Sotomayor:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wetzstein:Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution