Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Rapid, Reliable and Practical, Functional Flow-Cytometric Assay

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin treatment, associated with morbidity and mortality. HIT is characterized by thrombocytopenia and thrombotic complications secondary to the formation of antibodies (Abs) against heparin-platelet-factor 4 (PF4) complexes. The pathologic mechanism involves the binding of the heparin-immune-complex to the platelet-Fc-receptor, resulting in platelet activation, aggregation, and rapid elimination. The diagnosis of HIT requires laboratory confirmation. Common laboratory testing is based on immune detection of antibodies directed against the PF4/heparin complex (ID-H/PF4-PaGIA or ELISA). However, these assays suffer from methodological limitations, especially low specificity, as compared to the platelet functional assays. The “gold standard” functional test for detecting of platelet-activating antibodies is the radioactive [¹⁴C] serotonin-release assay (¹⁴C-SRA) (Sheridan D, et al, Blood. 1986;67:27-30, Kelton JG, et al.,Blood.1988;72:925-30). However, the assay includes the use of a radiolabeled biological probe and requires considerable expertise to obtain reliable results. Consequently, its use is limited to research laboratories.

To overcome the methodological limitations associated with current assays, we modified a functional flow-cytometry assay (FCA), which exhibits high sensitivity and specificity (Tomer, A. Br J Haematol, 1997;98: 648-656 , Tomer, A., et al, Am J Hematol, 1999;61: 53-61). This assay, similar in concept to the ¹⁴C-SRA, determines the capacity of the patient's serum to activate platelets in the presence of heparin, using a fluorescent probe.

Consecutive samples from 254 patients clinically suspected for HIT were tested. The FCA assay was compared with the standard ID-H/PF4-PaGIA antigenic assay (DiaMed, Switzerland) with two dilutions to assess specificity (Nellen, V., et al.,Haematologica, 2012;97: 89-97).

Of the total 254 samples tested, 48 (19%) were positive by PaGIA, compared to 13 (5.1%) positive by the functional FCA (Table 1). The number of PaGIA positive samples was reduced to 24 (9.4%) by 1:16 dilution, and to 14 (5.5%) by 1:32 dilution. All FCA positive samples were positive at all PaGIA dilutions (relative sensitivity 93%). Thirty PaGIA negative samples were all negative by the FCA (relative specificity 100%).

The results suggest that the functional FCA is a practical, sensitive, and highly specific test for the reliable diagnosis of HIT.

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.